549 yards!

Were the Packers playing Oklahoma Sunday? In Lambeau Field! This might have been the worst display of defense ever exhibited in Lambeau, I’m sure those numbers will come out in the coming days. One thing is sure, it was a complete embarrassment to head coach Mike McCarthy and more importantly defensive coordinator Bob Sanders. Not to mention the fans. I certainly was embarrassed by what I paid to see today. In 10 degree weather no less.

549 yards. As a defense you almost have to try NOT to stop anybody to give up that many yards. Al Harris said we are “the best” secondary in the league, yet Matt Schaub can throw for 414 yards on them. In Lambeau. Yes Bob, you are a genius. Way to adjust. If this is the best Al, I’d hate to see the worst.

After today we all know where the problem lies and who to blame. Sanders is the problem and McCarthy, who hired him, is to blame. Judging by Ted Thompson’s comments in today’s Press-Gazette, it is a given Sanders is gone. Thompson said the defense needs to be “orchestrated better” and the orchestrater is Bob Sanders. This season is obviously over, so McCarthy’s challenge now is to keep the team playing hard for three weeks with nothing to play for and a defense that probably can’t help then win in any way, shape, or form. Good luck with that Mike.

I have to believe unless the Jaguars or Bears lay down, the Packers might have won their last game. The Lions have to be licking their chops waiting for week 17.

From this day forward we are looking at next year. It is time to evaluate what we have and determine where we need to upgrade. Shouldn’t be too hard. I hope in the last three weeks Rodgers continues to play as well as he has and doesn’t try to do too much to overcome his pathetic defense. I hope either Ryan Grant or Brandon Jackson take ownership of the running game. I hope the new punter does well. And I hope Bob Sanders is fired on December 29.

And so are the days of our lives…

  • Henry

    Larry,

    You didn’t answer my question. Is the team performing better or worse?

  • Larry

    Why, there is no comparison that this team is playing better, cant you tell? What a dumb question!

  • Larry

    I apologize Henry, that just blurted out. No, I don’t think this team is playing better. I’m sure that the only answer is that Favre isn’t here.

  • paul

    Finally Larry…you get it.

  • Larry

    I made a point of going back and reading your previous posts, paul. Oh, I get it alright. What separates us is that I was a Favre fan because I was a Packer fan as opposed to those on this thread who are Packer fans because they are Favre fans. Players come and go, get over him or follow him. You’ll obviously be much happier.

  • paul

    Larry, I was a Packer fan before Favre was born….this is not entirely my post but from a writer I respect..read on.

    Now the Packers team is in Disarray. The coaching staff does not have the players prepared to play. The team shows no discipline whatsoever. The players are not playing every play hard. Many players are slowing down in the middle of a play, receivers don’t continue to run their routes etc.etc. This is a lack of leadership and coaching. No other stupid excuses please. This team is pretty much the same team as last year. Unlike last year when this team showed alot of hustle and fire, this team look disinterested. Why? We all know why. It is what took place this pre-season. Yes, what Ted Thompson, Mark Murphy, and Mike McCarthy has lead to this. Brett Favre was a leader and a motivator. The players responed to him and played hard. Now we have no leadership. Our coach and mangement staff has no integrity and how do you expect to get players to respond when that is the case. Well now you all see just how bad what these guys did was. Expect more of the same. Last year we were one poorly coached game from the Superbowl. With pretty much the same team except for a new QB we don’t look any better than the Bears. :(

  • BUFFALO JIM

    LARRY, YOU CAN’T FIGURE OUT WHY ONLY ONE S B WIN IN 16 YEARS. i can’t understand how you and most everyone else who comments here seemingly dosn’t remember how this all started. if holmgren didn’t get to thinking he was god’s greatest gift to football and would have stayed in green bay there would have been many more sb wins starting by not losing to denver. after all he was the one who could manage b.f. all he had to do was stay there and do it, and we wouldn’t be discusing this horable season. instead all he wanted to do the week before the sb was talk about going to seattle. oh well for me there is a lot of pleasure in knowing seattle just keeps losing. holmgren is geting what he deserved for bailing on us. packer fan for 57 years and always will be. go pac. lead on A.R.

  • Larry

    Damn, when you’re right you’re right. I agree with everything you’ve said above with one exception………..regardless of the above truths, Favre had to go! Along with McCarthy’s help (ie; the stupid locker room gambit) he was set above the team. I don’t call that leadership. What Favre did offer was experience and another year of his experience would have put the entire program back another year. I disagree the game was poorly coached; I say the “gunslinger” took over, again. We’ll never agree on that point. I really don’t think you want to compare our potential with the offensive weapons we do have (exception: OL) with da bearse do you? How can you call Favre a motivator when he wouldn’t even help Rodgers (ie; “not my job”)? In any case, good post, and in my opinion (for what its worth) you’re certainly more right than wrong.

  • Ima Genius Ur Not

    I hope McCarthy incorporates the slant route into this week’s game plan. I have a feeling that the Jags could be caught off guard. Oh, and I hope the LBs are left to cover the running backs one-on-one out of the backfield. Opposing teams have not been taking advantage of that as of late.

  • Larry

    Ha, Ha, and Ha. You are a genius man!

  • Oconomowockid

    Larry your hate of Favre clouds your perspective about how leaderless the Packers are right now. Ted has gotten what he wanted a team that is all his, no questions asked. He is all about his ego and that is what divided Packer Nation and has led to to going from 13-3 to a joke. Tell us all again how smart Mike and Ted are and how terrible Favre is. Try to clear the Favre hatred from your mind before you tell us all again.

  • Larry

    You couldn’t be more wrong. He was my QB for a long, long, time and just like former greats the end had come and he had to move on. I’ll have to take down the framed poster pretty soon. I’m going strictly on performance and those dumb INTs that even plaque him today. I don’t think you can point to any of my input that indicates hatred but when a guy goes on the field when he shouldn’t that’s ego man. What divides the Packer Nation are those who don’t realize that he’s gone and can’t move on. I maintain that the last couple of years were all about his records and not the betterment of the team – that, my friend, had to stop. Given the close games we’ve had with some pretty tough teams this year, I hardly think we’re a joke. How smart MM and TT are will have to be determined. Can’t tell you how terrible BF is, just that I don’t think things would have gone any better with him, but who could be sure.

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    Where does this “pretty much the same team” crap come from. Where is Cullen Jenkins, KGB, Atari Bigby, Nick Barnett? Not to mention Cory Williams and losing Al Harris for four games. How is losing four starters the “same team”? Yeah, KGB wasn’t a starter, but he did provide consistent pressure when he was on the field last year, which was often. If there is one thing TT hasn’t done it is provide depth on the defense. He failed with Harrell, and guys like Jason Hunter and Jeremy Thompson are just that – guys. I still feel the Packers defensive scheme leaves a lot to be desired, but good players can make a bad scheme look better than what the Packers have shown this year. There had better be an offseason push on the defensive side or Aaron Rodgers is going to see even more of comebacks foiled by a crappy defense.

  • Roy Jamison

    How many defensive coordinators do we have to go through? Al, you are right, TT has completely neglected to built a solid defense. He was playin’ a fiddle while Lambeau was burning. He has shown flashes of solving some problems. But this year, TT failed. I think someone a long time ago noted the strength of our offensive tackles and corners. That strength is going down the tubes with age and with age comes injuries. As for the defensive line and the Harrell pick, I have already voiced my opinion. They knew he was an injury wreck waiting to happen and picked him anyway. That is complete incompetence! Who is going to hold TT accountable?

  • iccyfan

    I just looked up “glutton for punishment” in the urban dictionary and it had Larry’s photo!

  • Larry

    Nah, no glutton here, have been through a hell of a lot worse than this. St. Vincent leaving (gee, thinking back it was worse before he came on board), when Starr-Hornung-Taylor left and the break-up of that team. Starr and Gregg not making it as coaches really hurt along with the Devine fiasco. Never being able to bring in anybody to help Dickey and Lofton (what a flop Jefferson was, here) and the Hadl thing. Always had an All-Pro or 2 during the 70′s and 80′s but wow what lousy teams overall. And before anybody suggests I’m willing to settle for that stuff again, I’m not. My point is we are a long way from being that again. Hey, I’m not real happy but it is what it is and I have to live with it and it is truly beyond my control. I just know better times are ahead because it has turned around before. Still think getting something for Favre was a coup; had he stayed retired (remember that?) we would have gotten nothing. There is not enough out there in FA each year to turn a team around, nor does anybody have enough cap space. You’ve got to do it through the draft and hope you get lucky with maybe one or two FAs.

  • RayL

    The “real Meal” JH is hurt again….I heard he had a papercut……

  • GoPackGo

    Lynn Dickey and Lofton had plenty of help , you are forgetting they had Paul Coffman at tight end and a very servicible Gerry Ellis at running back.
    To this day I think Coffman was the best tight end the Packers ever had and he was one of the best tight ends the NFL ever saw , he could block , he could catch, and he was tough as nails !
    I would not say John Jefferson was a flop here , teams always double teamed him.
    He however did not make the same impact as he did in San Diego..
    That Packer offense in 1983 was unstoppable. If Eddie Lee Ivery could have stayed healthy, that offense would have never had to punt.
    Harlan Huckleby was money in the bank on the goal line.
    Phillip Epps was a blazing fast receiver. So to say Dickey and Lofton had no help is not totally true.
    If Mike Butler did not leave in 1983 for the USFL , that defense would have been better and a super bowl won have been won in Green Bay in 1983.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Al, other than save money TT didn’t do anything to help the team this year. It’s not just a lack of depth on the defense. What about our O-line, backup QB, punter,the starters on the D-line. Let’s face it the man was a failure. The people who want to blame #4 for our playoff losses refuse to look at the reality of what we’ve become.

  • Pete H

    what do playoff losses and right now’s team have anything to do with each other?

  • Larry

    GPG you made my point better than I did. I’ve learned to ride these blips out with hope for the future and at least knowing the franchise is secure. Pete H you are so right even though you posed it as a question; the answer is contained within. Even if our record is less than desired we did have a lot of injuries and a very tough schedule when you consider 10 games against winning record teams and 9 of them playoff contenders (10 if you count NO, but in that Division a winning team might not make the playoffs). The bright side also contains good draft picks upcoming and probably an easier schedule next year. This could very well turn around in a hurry.

  • Pete H

    Just so everyone knows….as it is now, a crappy season has very little to do with schedule difficulty. All but 2 games are already set in stone, who and where. They will play their division twice, obviously, a full division elsewhere in the NFC, and a full division in the AFC….already predetermined. The other two games are decided by the final standings. The Packers will play the two tems from the other two NFC divisions that finish in the same position as the Pack. You also must remember that with this NFL, anyone rises and falls in a given year, again obviously, so our misfortunes this year have absolutely no bearing on what next year will bring schedule wise. We will play the entire NFC West, and the entire AFC North, along with, as it stands now at New Orleans and at home for Philly. Pleas people stop using our finishes as indicators, or reasons why they got harder or easier schedules. One really has nothing to do with the other.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Pete, if you blame #4 for our loss in the championship game(like Al and a lot of other people) then the rest of the team including the coach are OK. You don’t make any improvements you just get rid of #4, problem solved. And, you end up with the team we have now.

  • Pete H

    The only upside to this pathetic season is that we will get a higher pick than expected, which I expect will be translated into an unheard of, unheralded second round WR and 9 7th round picks, of which we will draft 3 more WRs and 4 guards with “potential”. We will also use our actual second round pick on a falling star QB who will compete with Brohm for the third string job because neither will be able to play better than our 7th round pick of Flynn. We will also trade Harris for a 4th and a 5th, using them both on fullbacks who will not make the first cuts because we already have 2 who are good. TT will then resign Frank Walker, Mark Roman and Marquand Manuel to “shore up” our injury proned safety spot. We will still go into next season with 4 total linebackers on the active roster, and Harrell will miss most of camp with back spasms. Driver will be released to “make room” for Jordy Nelson, who will then hold out for more money. Grant will stub his toe in the offseason, causing him to miss up thru week 9. Jackson will emerge as the go to guy, only to be sat on the bench after Grnat returns so he can “get into rythm”. Tauscher and Clifton will be let go, again to make some room for these new 7th round pick rookies and we will have the 5 Turnstyles of Walgreens on our line and finally Rogers will injure his shoulder in the first preseason game and miss the entire season, but we will not sign a vet because he just drafted this new rookie who also can’t play and the Pack will become the detroit Lions. Following the season Murphy will give TT his full support after Mccarthy finally fires his D coordinator, only to re-hire Ed Donatell. Oh yes, Crosby will be cut on opening day for some kid who just got from the domed Lions after missing every single kick in preseason. I think that baout covers it. Can’t wait til next year…

  • Pete H

    Okay Mark, I gotcha now.

  • Pete H

    I forgot one thing. Edgar Bennet will be the only coach let go, for no apparent reason, Rashaan Salaam will be hired, and also Dr. Phil will be brought in as a motivational therapist.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    On the other hand if you don’t blame #4 and instead give him credit for doing better against the Giants than Romo(in Dallas), Garcia(in Tampa) and Brady(on a perfect field, no wind or cold) then you get him some help to win the next year.

  • paul

    Love your post Pete. We will get a higher draft pick for sucking this year but TT will trade down as usual and pick up two 7th rounders for that. If he does pick in the first round, he will pick someone that ESPN does not even have a picture of….Lastly, I remember Ron Wolf stating either this year or the year before, “I have no idea what TT’s strategy is with this team.” That really makes me nervous.

  • roy jamison

    Harrell hurt again; Woodson stays at safety
    By Greg A. Bedard of the Journal Sentinel
    Dec. 10, 2008

    Patience? I’ve lost mine a long friggin’ time ago!

  • roy jamison

    I would think TT’s “vision” for this team is to make them like the Seattle Seahawks. Build em up, get em to the SB, lose to the Pittsburg Steelers, then everything falls apart. By that time TT has collected enuf checks to live comfortably ever after.

  • Dan

    TT had to leave Seattle before they could make it to the SB. When TT left in January 2005, Seattle had 16 unsigned free agents (including three of the biggest stars, Hasselbeck, Jones, and Alexander). How can a team have 1/3 of it’s team be free agents and make the playoffs?

    Seattle hired Mike Reinfeldt as a consultant to fix the problems. Reinfeldt turned the team into a SB contender. Reinfeldt is now the GM of the AFC best Titans.

    Reinfeldt draft picks in 2005…
    “Injuries to starting veteran linebacker Jamie Sharper put him into the starting lineup in his rookie year, and he did very well, totaling 72 tackles and 7.5 sacks from the outside linebacker position. He and rookie middle linebacker Lofa Tatupu were two of the biggest contributors to the 2005 Seahawks squad that went to Super Bowl XL.”

    Reinfeldt moved to the Titans in 2007. Notice how they have become a major force?

    To make things even more interesting, Reinfeldt was with the Packers from 1991-1998. An era that saw the Packer rise to the elite, just like when Reinfeldt has been in other places.

  • roy jamison

    Thanks Dan, that was a top notch comment. I am wondering why uncle Bob Harlan let Reinfeldt go?

  • roy jamison

    I’m gonna have to see Dr. Phil myself after reading stuff like this from MM about Harrell.

    He’s never really been able to get healthy,” coach Mike McCarthy said. “His snaps have been limited, and I thought there was some progress in the pass rush part of it and a little progress in the run blocking. Once again, he’s a young player that’s kind of going through a medical stage right now. We just have to keep working with him to get through it.”

    Note to MM: This guy has never been healthy. Not before you drafted him, not on draft day, and certainly not in his nearly 2 years in Green Bay. I am assuming we still sent him a paycheck. Hopefully we are accumulating medical data that will be helpful to send to the scout who suggested drafting him and also to the albino barn owl who let those words out, “We’ll take Justin Harrell!”. iyiyiyi (Maybe he can improve his pad level on the sidelines?) hopefully he’ll get on the next train that is leaving the station.

  • roy jamison

    Apologies to Greg Bedard for leaving this part out….

    Injuries have been a problem for Harrell dating back to college at the University of Tennessee.

    With the Volunteers, Harrell was healthy for just his junior season (2005). At other times, he dealt with a leg surgery (2003), ankle sprains (’03 and 2004) and a biceps-tendon surgery (2006). That latter injury forced him to miss off-season workouts with the Packers as a rookie. He then missed five games with an ankle injury and was active for seven.

  • Larry

    Gosh, all I inferred by easier schedule was that I think the AFC North and NFC West would not be as tough as this year. I’m really sorry if I offended some. At this point next year I don’t think we will have played 10 teams with winning records or 9 potential playoff teams.

  • Pete H

    I understand what you’re saying Larry, and no you did not offend me at all. I just din’t know if everyone understood how that all works now. The point really being that noone thought the Falcons would be anything but useless this year, or the Dolphins. Seattle was supposd to be good, as was GB, Cleve. Cincy, Jax. If the Cardinals stay for real, Seattle gets some swagger back, the Niners look like the team from the first 5 weeks and the Rams get any blocking for S. Jackson, then that division gets a little scary next year. The AFC North with Pitt and Balt. are always tough along with the Quinn lead Browns and a healthy Palmered Bengals. It could be just as bad next year. Hell, if they don’t fix their defense, then the two easiest looking teams, SF and Stl.’ S. Jackson and Gore are going to run for 1000 yds each, followed by Warner and Palmer throwing for 500 more. The if we do play NO and Philly it will be more of the same from Brees and Mcnabb…although I think Mcnabb will be a Viking next year so we see him twice.

  • Matt Hayton

    Okay Pete H-

    Going back to your post a few days ago:
    NOW let’s get your facts in order first, we are clearly not seeing the same games:

    Tampa game: Charles Woodson pick was the go ahead score in that game not a AR led drive, without the pick by Woodson we aren’t even in the game.

    Minnesota: without the pick 6 by Collins and Blackmon’s return that game is a blowout becuase AR played so piss poor in that game, easily his worst game of the year…

    So those are 2 close games we shouldn’t have even been in but were because of our defense. They hardly F***ed him in those 2 games, if anything it was AR F***ing the D. He hasn’t been screwed by them every time, in fact this year, he has more defensive and special teams TDs than any other Packer QB in history. And we are only 5-8? Take those off the board are we 3-10? No one ever answers this point, which I fidn to be interesting…Wow!

    In both the Carolina and Tennesee games he missed open WR’s for TD’s in 4th quarter drives and had to settle for field goals…at Carolina he missed a wide open DD at the the 25 yard line and against Tennessee he missed a wide open Jennings for a sure TD at about the 40 yard line. AND the defense didn’t hold.

    In fact the defense was plaing fine until we lost Barnett and then after Barnett went down (minus the Bears game, which has proved to be an anamolie), it has been piss poor. So in fairness to Rodgers the last 3 games the defense has been the key factor in the losses. Fair enough.

    The reality is that AR has played like a 1st year game manager QB and the team around him is only okay; this whole mess gets pinned on TT; and not AR.

    AR has looked good, even great at times (Home against the Vikes, Indy and Bears games) come to mind, but he has also lost us 3 or 4 games (Vikes in the dome, Tampa, Atlanta and either Carolina or Tennessee by missing those receivers), too; which there is nothing wrong with. I concede the defense and play-calling are responsible for some of those losses, but I also clearly see that AR is responsible for some of them, as well. A fact that you seem to ignore looking through those rose-colored glasses of yours.

    Bottom line: I don’t expect AR to be Favre, but I do expect him to win a game or two, WHEN HE SHOULDN’T; WHICH HE HASN’T DONE YET and YES it concerns me…

    Instead he’s made picks and has kicked field goals, consistently, in critcal situations and drives. And he has had his starting line, RB, intact the whole year (up until losing Tausch last week) and his defense/special teams has given him 7 TDs…and we’re only 5-8, it’s just a little concerning to me, that’s all.

    As far as insulting my football intelligence, that is fine: I just let the facts do the talking:

    1. I have blamed TT since before the year began for not having this team ready to go for a post-Favre led team, because I felt that AR was going to perform like a 1st year game manager QB and not a guy that can carry a team and that both the O and D-Lines were suspect at best.

    Check – Game-manager QB box; check suspect O-Line box; check suspect D-Line box.

    2. I was the one clamoring for Alan Faneca and Jason Taylor and bitching and moaning when TT traded away Williams so he could get his draft pick on the field. Because D-Line had issues getting a pass rush and stopping the run last year.

    check O-Line and D-Line lack of depth that could’ve been avoided box.

    3. I predicted a 7-9 season for this team, unless their were some injuries, in which case I thought we’d finish 6-10 or even 5-11, to which I was berated heavily by yourself and others who thought this team was better than it was before the season began. And that AR could come in and lead this team without skipping a beat.

    check accurate prediction box.

    Don’t it just burn your balls, when someone you accuse of being ignorant in a given subject, turns out to be smarter than you are.

    Kinda adds some credibility to my concerns with AR, too, don’t it now.

  • GoPackGo

    Rodgers did not lose us the game in Minnesota , McCarthy did. It was stupid to ask the guy to throw so many times in his first game in that hostile enviorment especially when Ryan Grant has had sucess against the Viking defense in the past and was doing well when he handled the ball in the dome this year.
    No way can he be blamed for the Carolina loss, he did start slow in that game but he was on fire in the second half , there was no more he could do in that game.

  • TRIP

    Hayton,

    I’m disappointed your predicted a losing season, and was right.

  • TRIP

    And yes Roy,

    The Albino Barn Owl’s drafts have been at best, mediocre.

  • Pete H

    Look Matt, I am not saying that are totally football ignorant, but the comparison to Favre are, and for you to say that you don’t expect Rodgers to be Favre when every single stat you have brought up is about Brett is also wrong. If you want I will go back and quote them all. I also never said that Rodgers didn’t need to get better, he absolutely does. What I said was that this is his first year starting, making his absolute first starts period. To say that heas played like a first year game manager, when that is what the play calling has dictated, probably due to his first year status, is a big fat DUH! As I said, why don’t you look up some other QBs, besides perhaps the best ever, and see how he fits in there. Is Rodgers going to be a first ballot HOFer, probably not……Also the defense was not “fine” before Barnett got hurt. They were a big puddle of piss against the run all year. Now that he is gone, they are just as bad against the pass. Again, turn those two games around, that even you admit, the defense directly cost them in the end and they are 7-6. In just the last three alone they have given up over 1200 yds and 110 points. Yep, not their fault. How about Minn. when Peterson ran for 190+…or the 180 they gave up to the Titans, maybe Michael Turner running for 120 and Roddy White catching 130 worth is their defining game. The 180 on the ground to the Bucs? Was that the “fine” defense you’re talking about? Oh I know, it was the 480 total yards to the Cowboys right? In every loss they have had they have been just lit up in at least one aspect of their “fine” D, often both. I could give a rats ass about them having more defensive TDs then in the past. Does it help, sure, but lets reverse the question. Instead of pointing the finger and declaring what a first year QB “is” by stating how bad we’d be without those TDs…look at how bad the defense would be without those. That is the only thing they have done at all! Every opponent possession that doesn’t result in a defensive TD for us usually results in some long drive that either scores or screws them in field position. How many three and outs have they gotten? What my point was is that TT, MM and Sanders were supposed to have a defense that could carry them, while allowing Rodgers to manage the game in this, his first year, as he learned the NFL, and they have let him down miserably. How about this..instead of saying that you can’t name one time that Rodgers has had a game winning drive, try asking, lets try and think of thewhen the defense mad a game saving stop? OOPS Oh yes the Lions game, but only after they surrendered the huge lead y getting shredded in the second half. Ya Rodgers needs to get better, but as a first year starter I’m betting he will…just a hunch. the Arizona Cardinals and Texans each scored 7 defensive TDs last year, were they any good?

  • Pete H

    Now, as for what I said before the season began…I was entirely against almost everything TT did. I did say that I think Rodgers would do fine…and I think his stats back that up. I did not, however, say that he should come out and be Brett Favre, nor did I think that was possible, and especially not a partial remembrance of him. I did say that other people were going to have to step up and fill some of the extra that Brett brought to the table, of which noone has. The running game has not produced as it should, clearly the defense has not, the O line blows, the punter sucked, and they have had a myriad of injuries and yet despite all that Rodgers has played well enough to have his team in nearly every game this season. The only one they had no shot in was when he couldn’t quite score on EVERY posssesion! Rodgers needs that come from behind victory, I agree, but he has also not gone out there and given games away. As for Brett, noone should ever be compared to him or held up to his standard. He is a one-of-a-kind that we will not see in the league again, nor shold we expect to.

  • Pete H

    I really find it comical that you can go off on TT for not having a post-Favre led team ready to compete, talk about all of their deficiencies (including the defense) that you knew were there in the preseason, then defend the defense and blast Rodgers for not being able to carry this incompetent post-Favre team by himself as a first year guy …as Favre was able to. Really, which is it?

  • paul
  • Devil’s Advocate…

    Well, the year’s pretty much over except for the games and beer drinking. Checking in every so often, I can’t believe Favre is still coming up. Save a little Favre talk for next season now and maybe you can still be doing comparisons in the 2010 season yet too, if your lucky. How fun is that? Some of you whiners ever think, that maybe you help perpetuate the very things you hate??? TT knows he has a section of a rabid fan base out there and a split fan base. I’m sure the players know it too. It certainly may affect the things TT may do and how the players play. So, you whiners should be happy, you got what you want. You reap what you sew…… I feel bad for the D, they never really got it going, a couple close loses and some injuries, lose of confidence and that’ll do it. I can’t even remember the last time I’ve heard Pickett’s name called, and he’s supposed to be one of the steady guys….. Anyway, glad some of you got to be right, of course, all the while happy to be wrong…… Wow, that should be a bumper sticker!

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    And for the record, I put alot of this year on MM. I think the whole Favre thing and his new family life have taken it’s toll. Hell, I can count a handful of times where a DE has come around from the opposite side to tackle the RB. I can only remember one reverse being called all year. I remember the shovel pass being used one game, worked quite well, don’t believe I seen it called since. He used to be good for some gimick call about every other game, I think this year was one fake punt and one on-sides. I think he’s bored the team w/zone run inside, zone run outside (stretch), and the slant pattern pass play (almost a given on downs of three yards or less). If he doesn’t have a power team, at least he’d better do a better job of calling a good mix of plays to keep the other team off-guard and guessing…..

  • http://Orlando Mark

    DA, all Packer fans want is for our team to be competitive and if not at least to have something to cheer about. Now that it’s over I can tell you this year has been something of a disappointment. Maybe you don’t feel we should object to the results we ended up with, and want us to blindly support the management. I’d like to help them do a better job next year by pointing out what I believe to be their shortcommings. By the way the defense couldn’t “get it going” due to management decisions regaurding the D-line, in my opinion.

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    The Pack are two in-excusable ref calls from being 7-6 and in the thick of things even w/all their troubles this year. To hear some, you’d think they’d been blown out almost every game. But if you all think that helps, so be it. If you think they live in a vaccuum and it can’t enter the locker room, keep pointing out all the negative stuff to help them. Maybe you all can head over to the Jet’s site and let them all know who and what sucks about them for their stretch run. What they should have done better. I just don’t think they’ve done enough…….. But hey, gotta have something to talk about and maybe some of us get perception of statements wrong sometimes….

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    Mark, I’ve seen that statement as many times as I’ve seen the Pack run the slant route! Alot!

  • iccyfan

    Matt Hayton Says:
    “As far as insulting my football intelligence, that is fine: I just let the facts do the talking”

    This just might be the funniest thing I’ve read on this site in weeks! The majority of what you blather is based on opinion and conjecture; on the rare occasion you do cite “facts”, they’re often wrong. You wonder aloud why nobody replies to your unanswerable ponderings (what would the record be without seven defensive TD’s?) and bristle when somebody questions your football IQ? Puhleeeease…. What do you expect when your “stock post content” is based on: 1) I predicted this record but I’m sorry I’m right; 2) None of this would have happened if BF was still QB; 3) “thanks for proving my point” when the opposing view has done nothing of the sort.

    Most folks on this site are disappointed with the direction this season has gone (excepting those who “predicted” it), but 95% realize it’s been a confluence of many factors leading to the “perfect storm”. On the flip side, you and a few outspoken others see this losing record strictly thru the lens of the Brett Favre trade. It’s overly simplistic and you have gone way past the point of ridiculous!