Home opener just got even more interesting

Well, well, well, the Chicago Bears have a quarterback. Or do they? It looks like highway robbery to me. The Denver Broncos get two first round picks and Kyle Orton? Are you kidding me? When Cutler became available by my new favorite owner in the NFL, Pat Bowlen, the Broncos said the asking price was two first-round draft picks. Normally when you put something for sale, you ask for more than what you know you are really going to get. In this case, the Bears offered more than the starting point. Wow! Chicago, my kind of team.

If you haven’t guessed already I’m not a big Jay Cutler fan. He has never been able to win a big game. Two years ago all the Broncos had to do was beat the lowly 49ers in Mile High in week 16 to get into the playoffs and Cutler couldn’t get it done. The same thing happened again last year as the Broncos swooned down the stretch and ended up firing head coach Mike Shanahan after the season. Shanahan’s decision to draft Jay Cutler ended up costing him his job. Cutler has all the tools but one, and that is the most important one – the head. Cutler is a little baby and if you are a mental midget, you will never win in the NFL. Cutler is 17-20 as a starter. How does that record justify giving up two first-round picks and a starting quarterback with a better winning record? Once again, wow!

This move kind of reminds me of the Tampa Bay trade for head coach John Gruden. The Bucs gave up two-first round picks and two-second round picks which doomed them from the start. They got the Super Bowl win the first year with Tony Dungy’s team and sucked every year since because they didn’t have those picks to keep them at a high level. That’s why I think the Bears may be the division favorite this year, but the price they paid is too high and if they don’t win right away it will be a horrible deal. I wouldn’t trade Cutler for Aaron Rodgers no way, no how. Even though, like Cutler, Rodgers has not yet proven he can win the big game or take a team on his shoulders and lead them to victory. The difference is Rodgers improved from week to week last year and actually had he had a kicker he would have had at least three come-from-behind wins. Cutler hasn’t improved any if at all since he became a starter. Last year’s big numbers were because the Broncos lost six running backs to injury, all they did was pass.

I am a happy man today. The Bears just shot themselves in the foot if they don’t win the Super Bowl this year. To be honest, I was much more worried about the Bears signing Michael Vick when he becomes available in July than getting Cutler. The Bears have taken a huge gamble which I think it will be a one-year success story, and believe you me, I am not counting out the Packers to win the division. I believe the Packers switch to the 3-4 defense is much less complicated than the media makes you believe. I mean, it’s not a different game. It’s not a foreign defense that nobody has ever played before. Anyway, I digress, bottom line is I think the Bears GM along with head coach Lovie Smith made a desperate move to save their jobs after not making the playoffs since winning the NFC in 2006.

I can’t wait for opening day. Rodgers proved he can handle the hype when he whipped the Vikings last year on opening day on Monday Night Football. This year Rodgers will be second fiddle to the Bears and Cutler. I love it. Cutler opens his Bears’ career at Lambeau Field. I am pumped and it is only April, it is going to be a long five months. Plenty of time for Charles Woodson and Al Harris to get ready. Another early prediction – Harris takes one to the house.

  • Roy Jamison

    The thrills of the draft come with the unknown. Here in Kansas City, because the Chiefs used a number two to acquire Matt Cassel, the thinking is they might want to reacquire a second round pick by moving down. They need extra help on defense like the Pack, and probably don’t like the thought of shelling out real big bucks on a number 3 choice. Of course, nothing may happen at all if the right deal doesn’t crystalize, but it certainly is interesting how the draft can change from what it looks like now to what it really will be on draft day, due to a couple of deals.

  • Oconomowockid

    Larry can’t give up on Favre. Come on Larry you can do better than that!!! I think Matt is starting to take his toll on you. Cutler is a guy who will want the ball in his hands in the final two minutes. Call him a gunslinger, he is a player with an entire different set of skills compared to what Chicago had. The point is, he has made Chicago better. “If” we can get some players from free agency we have the potential to get better as well. If we have another average draft and little participation in free agency we have the chance to lose both games to Chicago.

  • Michael Legat

    Hayton may be a “sky is falling” kinda dude but a.) he plays fair, b.) while it is obvious where he stands re: direction of team, he’s shown himself to be pretty reasonable in a debate, and c.) he’s the definition of a fan. I’m with him in that I love stats, but I prefer wins.

    Consider Jay Cutler the ultimate litmus test regarding if Chicago is where offensive players go to die. I’ve been of the belief that the Bears’ offensive woes of the last twenty years are institutional – if Cutler can’t give them a top 10 passing attack, then I don’t know what it would take.

  • Matt Hayton

    Larry-

    I sure hope so! I’d love nothing more than Woodson, Harris and Collins to all get’em once on opening night…and atleast one pick six in there…that’d be a nice welcoming party to the NFC North!

    I just hope we have a defensive line that doesn’t let them come back and beat us 52 to 49!

  • Matt Hayton

    Roy – nice post…

    Not that I think TT would do this, but I think it’d be pretty sweet, if he traded up to #3 and got Aaron Curry (best overall prospect in this draft IMHO)…Our D-Line might still suck but frick could you imagine Curry w/Barnett, Hawk and Kampman flying around back there! I think that’d be a thing of beauty…heck you might not even need a D-Line w/a set of LB’s like that!

  • Matt Hayton

    Legat-

    Thanks for the olive branch…much appreciated. Agreed. I’m all about the W’s!

  • Larry

    Like I said a couple weeks ago, Matt, our 1-6-4 defense. And Ocono, the topic was JC not BF and I was repeating his rep out of Vandy. Just for the record, I loved our guy and went the normal fan route w/ the jerseys, posters, etc. Just got tired of the throwing into triple coverage the last few years. Irresponsible comes to mind.

  • Rocky70

    Matt Hayton arrives at the big game to help his teammates claim the championship.
    He gives the pre-game pep talk to his team.

    “Well fellows, we’ve made it this far. But let’s realistic. We don’t stand a chance because most of the opponent’s players are better than us. We are basically an inept team. Our coaches aren’t very good & we have few, if any strengths. And if you don’t believe me then I’ll produce some numbers to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that I am correct in my assumptions. -Now let’s go out & not lose too badly. ”

    I’m glad you weren’t on any of my teams in HS & college. Your pessimistic view of everything GB is profoundly ignorant. -And I’ve got numbers to prove it. LOL. LOL.

  • Reid

    AR has only played 1 year. That’s not enough “statistics” to form a credible opinon. Give him another year or two and then you can actually compare who is the better QB based on credible numbers. My point is the same as what is shown in the record books, there is always some minumum number of attempts/games/etc to qualify. If not, then some QB could come in and throw 1 pass to a RB and set the record for highest career completion percentage at 100%. Until he plays another year or two, anyone who says the “numbers” show something is jumping to a conclusion.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    It’s more to the point to compare Cutler to Orton than #12. Also did Cutler avoid sacks because he got rid of the ball sooner or was it the Denver O-line. The other meaningful question is can we get to him without interior pass rushers. The answers await the opening kickoff, all the discussion of who’s better is foolish right now.

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    Rocky70……. We all know Matt Hayton is one of the biggest pessimist on the board and we’ve all had our share of what someone else would consider an ignorant opinion, you and myself included. So what’s your point? It’s good to have a few perspectives, done well on all ends.

    I was thinking it’d be fun to do some sort of bracket, pool or league on the draft but not sure how it’d be done. Couldn’t really have everyone throw in a couple bucks for the winner, being we’re all around the U.S. If someone can think of a way to do a round 1 or a Packers first 4 picks kind of thingy………….. I’ll play along!!!

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    A thought…………….. If Admin. Al would open up a new post for everyone’s picks, 1-32, a couple days before the draft, I’ll waste my time doing the math. Could give 10pts. for a correct pick and 2 for a wrong pick, for a player that plays on the same side of the ball as your pick (offense or defense). Still wouldn’t cover the problem of trades. Wouldn’t be for much else than bragging rights, I suppose. Thoughts???

  • Matt Hayton

    Rocky…

    Here we go again…no substance just jargon… You’re invalidating yourself by not letting this go…

  • Matt Hayton

    Larry-

    I agree #4, got a little big for his britches sometimes…SO as far as Curry, would you like that move? (Us trading up to get him at #3)?

    DA – Al, I 2nd that…I’m all for the draft post…be kinda fun…

  • Pack4life

    I have always believed the Bears 13-3 season under Dick Jauron was a fluke. The 2007 Packers may have to be considered the same if no improvement happens this year. Because of the considerable weakness of the division, the NFC North should be a place for a good starting point for a Super Bowl Contender i.e. Bears 06,Packers 07.

    Get er done Ted!

  • Lew

    Don’t worry about it Matt H., Rocky is an idiot and has provided nothing to this thread. If his background was in “statistical analysis” you would think that he would have logic. He fails to grasp your point. I will try to make it concise for you Rock-O since I am in the same boat as Matt. Cutler is a huge improvement for the Bears, will make the division tougher for years, and from a pure physical talent/potential perspective he far exceeds A-Rod. This is not a rip on A-Rod. If he stays healthy, and continues to develop, he is more than good enough to win a championship(s).

    People also like to rip on cutler for being whiny and somewhat of a premadonna (me included), but what isn’t posted on here is that his teammates trust him. They want him with the ball at the end of the game and are confident he will pull it out. Similar to #4.

    I am all for the draft board.

  • Matt Hayton

    yep agreed on all points lew…

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    Other option, could do a Packers draft also, by position instead of player (be impossible to do by player and may be nearly impossible, by position, the way TT drafts). (DL,ILB,OLB,S,CB/QB,RB,WR,TE,OL) Same idea as other, problem is still trades. You guys go ahead and call each other idiots and ignorant, etc. Someone still needs to solve the problem of trades, to do this little draft challenge thingy though…..

  • WakeUpPeople

    Seriously you people in love with Cutler let me refresh you guys on a few facts here…..Cutler had the 16th QB rating in the NFL last year. That puts him behind people like Seneca Wallace, Shaun Hill, Jeff Garcia, Matt Schaub AND WAAAY behind Aaron Rodgers. Also he has one of the best group of 3 receivers in the NFL to throw to. Another thing is that Denver had NO running game so they had to throw throw throw which is how Cutler racked up 4000+ yards. Granted he is a step up from Orton and COULD turn out to be really good someday but seriously people are annointing him this franchise QB for the next 10 years….you guys are friggen nuts. Rodgers on paper is a better QB than him and I can say he’s going to be a franchise QB for the next 10 years but he certainly has at least a better chance than whiney ass cutler.

  • JeffN

    I disagree with everyone on the Rodgers/Cutler comparison. Nobody has enough info on either to compare which is a better QB. I Suppose the speculation is all there is to do this time of year.

    I’m glad and feel lucky we have Rodgers and only had to spend 1 first rounder on him and have a coach that can coach a QB.

    I suppose if I were the Bears and haven’t had a QB in decades I wouldn’t mind spending a ton of draft picks on an Aaron Rodgers calibur QB like Cutler. The Bears QB coaches better get their job done. If they don’t all fingers will pointed at them for the success or demise of Cutler.

    There is a lot that goes into makings of an NFL QB.

  • Larry

    MattHayton, I feel like you just stabbed me in the heart. You know how I hate trading up. If he were avail @9 it means I have to pass on Jenkins and I think CBs are harder to find. If I knew for sure he is another LT, you bet, otherwise my gut feels like going for more later because of the DE/OLB pool. He is the class LB in the draft, however; my gosh 4:55@250lbs, wow. (4)year starter too. I dont think I could pull trigger on a trade up, but could go 9 if my coaches wanted, but I agree he wont last that long. Sorry not to answer more decisively but I just dont know!

  • Mel e Mel

    One Point people seem to miss, Jay Cutler was drafted for Mike Shanahans system.
    No reasonable person believes the Bears & Bronco systems are remotely similar.

  • Rocky70

    Lew-Lew

    I see you are still having problems with the name-calling.
    I’ve checked out some of your past posts especially from last summer/fall.
    Unfortunately I don’t get into banter anymore with “Farvettes’. Most of you ‘people’ have changed your IDs to avoid the embarassment of being so wrong last season. You should have too.

    Another thing of note: Why is it Lew-Lew always seems to run to ‘MH’s rescue ?? (and vise-versa) (within minutes) It’s odd that you both happen to be on-line at just about the same time. -Using two IDs on the same blog ?? Improbable, maybe. Impossible, not at all.

  • JeffN

    I’m pumped to see how the Cutler Rodgers rivalry unfolds throughout the the years. These types of things are what makes the NFL even more awesome.

    Mel, it’s on the Bears coaching staff to make sure that Cutler knows and makes the transition to the Bears offensive system on day 1; No differently than the Packers coaching staff has to make certain that the Packers defensive players make the 3-4 transition on day 1 of the season. Now there will be little things here and there that will happen due to learning curve but for the most part the players should have it down and if they don’t, then that’s on the coaches.

  • JeffN

    Rocky, I’m not sure what some of these clowns are up to. They could be flip flopping user ids. I don’t know. I wouldn’t argue with them tho.

  • JeffN

    I mean I have before but it’s kind of pointless.

  • Matt Hayton

    Nice one Rocky 70…I mean “WakeUpPeople” …If you’ll notice I don’t have anything to hide…just Matt Hayton all the time.

  • Matt Hayton

    Larry-

    I think the issue with us taking another DB in the first few rounds is Jarrett Bush…
    Here’s why: 10 db’s is the max you keep…

    Collins, Bigby, Rouse, Peprah were on last years roster, plus they signed Smith…so that means Peprah is probably gone…aside from that I don’t see any changes at Safety.

    They are set at CB -Harris, Woodson, Williams (nickel) and Lee (2nd rounder) are locks…and I don’t see them cutting Blackmon since he had 2 return TD’s…and has shown some flashes…which brings me back to Bush.

    If they draft Jenkins, they would need to cut Bush, which would cost TT $2 million in cap dollars, since that is what he just signed him for…don’t think he’ll do that either…

    My guess is that maybe they take a flyer in the later rounds…Michael hawkins type talent and see if they can bring him into camp, then sneak him onto their practice squad…and try and develop him to compete for a roster spot next year…

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    Rocky, Jeff, and the rest, anybody who uses a name like “wakeupeople” is clearly doing it to hide her identity and also her choice of a name proves she thinks her shit don’t stink. She should not be given the respect of a response. We’ve seen it before with you-know-who.

  • WakeUpPeople

    Actually I’m a new poster. If admin is AJ your nephew recommended this site to me and I’ve met you several times. Thanks for trying to tell me i’m someone who i’m not tho.

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    Hey, sorry if I picked on you right off the bat. If you knew the history of this blog you would understand what I’m talking about. Thanks for coming back. Stick around, it sure get’s intense at times. Say hi to Chad for me. You’ll probably punch him in the mouth next time you see him (hehe).

  • Oconomowockid

    The last three posts are classic. This is what this board is all about, tolerance and humor.

    Go Pack

  • Larry

    OK guys, lets flip this around, and why not? I’m coming from the standpoint that the injuries to the OL and DL last yr decimated a 13-3 team because of the comparison of the QB #s which dont show a drop off from ’07 to ’08. We also took tremendous hits at LB, CB, and Safety too. Jenkins and Harrell are physically sound and Jolly’s legal problems are behind us and he adapts well to the 3-4. Tauscher is back by the 4th game but Giaco fills in nicely. Clifton is, well, what he is a journeyman LT. TE is OK and the C/OG spots are well handled by Spitz, Preston, Colledge, and interestingly our most experienced guy in that group is the weakest link, Wells. We can get another yr out of our starting CBs even in zone and Williams is no slouch. Grant can finally come out of the chute at the beginning of the season, the FBs will take out DLs, and Jackson can catch on 3rd down out of the backfield. All this behind a settled OL. Collins, Bigby(healthy), and Smith are the best in the Division and Rouse has developed. The back-up QBs have another camp behind them and either can step in if need be. Oh, our LB corp is the best in the Division too even with the switch to 3-4. Well then, that leaves 9 picks to play around with, up or down, for back-ups and development because we have our starters. Nose could use help, but at 9 if he is not a starter? Plenty of DE and OLB in the pool so do you go 9 for one position on the roster at that cost $$wise? Well, you would if it were REGGIE, but I digress. Why cant I dream the possitive just as much as the doom and gloom guys do their negs?

  • Larry

    Yeah, Matt, I did forget about Bush. Its just that I got the feeling that Malcom could be another Charles………..!

  • Roy Jamison

    You know the old saw of “if ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we’d all have a Merry Christmas”? This team on defense is loaded with them. But the OT position is also right there along with CB. Clifton reminds me of my old ’99 Nissan Altima, it ran great for years and years. No problems slushing thru mud, taking a daily pounding. Then, it started leaking oil, the interior started to wear out from my big butt scraping against it, and when the brakes gave out again, one year after a major brake job…I sadly said goodbye. Clifton needs alignment, new tires, new shocks and his transmission is about to go.

  • JeffN

    Roy, I actually agree with you on that. He might, and I say might have 1 season left in him.

    I think the solution is to move College out to Left Tackle and release Clifton. That way they can draft defense. They can let the rest of the guards battle over the left guard spot left open from the College move.

    I think College is a better tackle than a guard and a for sure upgrade over a worn out Clifton.

    Seriously tho the biggest upgrade for out O-line is going to be settling on who the starting 5 are and sticking with it and letting them gel.

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    Admin. Al………….. You may need to update your picture on your site. I see you still have #4 leading the way with #94 (KGB) following along in the background and who knows about (#65)Tausch??? I believe I even see Mr. #88 (Bubba).

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    Caught myself thinking today about a classmate that comes back every year to visit family. She brought a couple girlfriends back with her one year and they’re from out Boston way, so the three of them took in the game at Lambeau against the Cheaters. The two ladies wore their Cheaters jerseys (classmate: Packer jersey, still a green and gold girl). Anyway, the Pack got drubbed but her friends were very impressed with the fans. Had things been reversed, they said the Cheater fans would have harrassed them the whole game. They went back knowing that the Cheaters had the better team, but the Pack had the better fans, far and away. They couldn’t get over how friendly everyone was, even wearing the opponents jersey. Of course the classmate and one of the girlfriends are hotties, so that probably didn’t hurt either……. Hopefully we can get the team playing to standards that our awesome fans set!!!

  • Lew

    Sorry Rock-O, Matt H. and I are not the same person. Again, if you had the minor analytical abilty to look at our posts, it would be very obvious. Some people happen to have similar views on the state of the franchise. Plus Matt is never an a-hole and I take pride in being the resident a-hole while still making solid points.

    And again rocks, you are all talk. You looked at my old posts, but why don’t you quote me from my old posts and then criticize me? Oh yeah, right…because I am pretty on point. I will admit A-Rod did better than I thought he would and at the same time won me over. I am still concerned about his health-especially with our o-line, but he exceeded my expectations.

    Larry, you want jenkins at #9? He seems to be a safety in the NFL.

  • Lew

    Great Onion headline this week,

    “Sean O’Hair gains revenge by angrily masturbating to Tiger Woods’ wife”

  • Larry

    Lew, because of the comparison to Woodson, can go either way. 6-0, field fast, “cuts field in half” at either FS or CB. Tough, tackles, 11 INTs, I still like Big 10 vs Southwest weather conditions, came back for Senior yr after being projected as 1st rounder last yr. Whats not to like, I dont see the downside? I think he’ll be a perenial All-Pro with a lot of rookie starting time, if not the starter. Need, (if we keep #9) may dictate for DE/OLB because of the D switch, but I think Jenkins is by himself at either position. There are so many adequate big guys available on D that I think (again, if we keep #9) we have a chance to get an elite guy who will eventually start for us for years.

  • Larry

    Another point popped into my head; in the switch to zone coverage it convinces me even more that he will fit in. Even maybe better than Harris. He is also in the 204-206 range hard hitter mold which I like. But you are right that that would be a total “best athlete” rather than need pick tho. I’m so conservative that I’m scared at 9 that if I make the wrong choice I’ll never hear the end of it on this blog so if Malcolm is not available I’m trading down…………….! I dont think Hawk is a #5 although I was totally in favor of that one, too. Who knew? Or has he been misused?

  • Pack4life

    AMEN JEFF! Fix the Oline Draft some D and make Cutler PAY!

  • Roy Jamison

    And now from Kansas City radio sports guys comes an interesting tidbit. Recalling a draft from yesteryear when the Minnesota Vikings drafting at the number 7 position waited until time expired on the clock. Yup, two picks went by till the Vikes took the 9th player, Kevin Williams (does number 9 ring a bell?) and then when bizness time came, argued with the agent that they didn’t take a number 7 pick but a number 9 pick. After a bunch of haggling, the Vikes ended up saving money on that deal. The reason this came up was wondering if the kinda-on-the-cheap (okay call it frugal) Lions might go to sleep on number one. It might not happen, but there is a precedent for it.

  • Pack4life

    The Vikes are a 2nd rate outfit that didnt know what is was doing. Detroit is already negotiating with the the pick. I know why KC Sports stations are reporting this, because all their pro teams are putrid.

  • Roy Jamison

    LOL, you have a good point there Pack4! So, you think that first pick will be based on who wants to settle for a certain amount rather than who the pick is? Let’s say Curry will work for less than qb Stafford and you have rated Curry higher, what do you do? I’m not sure what Lions fans are thinking after so many years in the dumper. They can’t keep making terrible mistakes year after year can they?
    Altho, I like that Viking defense. Don’t understand why they keep hoping Jackson will “evolve.” I’d have given Leftwich a try instead of what they did, but I guess that justifies your remarks!

  • Roy Jamison

    You know after the draft, the experts always grade the draft which is ridiculous but it suits a purpose I guess. Most say a draft should be graded 3 years afterwards to give players a chance to develop. I’ve got no problem with that thinking.
    Here’s the 2005 Pack draft. What’s your grade?
    1
    24
    QB Aaron Rodgers, Cal
    2
    51
    S/CB Nick Collins, Bethune-Cookman
    (From New Orleans for CB M.McKenzie)

    2
    58
    WR/KR Terrence Murphy, Texas A&M

    3
    89
    To Carolina in Draft Day Trade

    4
    115
    S Marviel Underwood, San Diego State
    (From Carolina in Draft Day Trade)
    Bio | Audio & Video

    4
    125
    LB Brady Poppinga, BYU
    Bio | Audio & Video

    4
    126
    To Philadelphia in Draft Day Trade
    (From Carolina in Draft Day Trade)

    5
    143
    C/G Junius Coston, North Carolina A&T
    (From Oakland for S M.Anderson)
    Bio | Audio & Video

    5
    162
    To Kansas City for DE R.Truluck

    5
    167
    CB Mike Hawkins, Oklahoma
    (From Philadelphia in Draft Day Trade)
    Bio | Audio & Video

    6
    175
    To New England in Draft Day Trade
    (From Philadelphia in Draft Day Trade)

    6
    180
    DE Mike Montgomery, Texas A&M
    (From Oakland for S M.Anderson)

    6
    195
    WR Craig Bragg, UCLA
    (From New England in Draft Day Trade)
    Bio | Audio & Video

    6
    199
    To Kansas City for DE R.Truluck

    7
    245
    LB Kurt Campbell, Albany
    (From Philadelphia in Draft Day Trade)

    7
    246
    G Will Whitticker, Michigan State
    (From New England in Draft Day Trade)
    Bio | Audio & Video

  • Matt Hayton

    Nice, Roy –

    I’ll bite… I’d have to give TT’s 2005 draft a solid “A”! Kiper and all of those guys, always says 3 starters = an A grade…so using that as a benchmark…Rodgers and Collins are solid starters to pro-bowl caliber players; Poppinga is adequate, but has been a starter for 2+ years.

    Also, hands down in hindsight the AR pick was a great pick. Anytime you can land a franchise QB in a draft and a couple of starters, that is a quality draft. Even me the TT-hater cannot argue at all here.

    My desire as a fan was to re-load in ’05…I remember wanting Heath Miller or Logan Mankins or Tatupa at the time, thinking they would have helped us solidify the O-Line (that was the year tt unloaded both Wahle and Rivera), or LB core (pre-AJ Hawk) or get a pass catching TE, since Bubba was slowing down…to make a final SB push w/you know who….but nonetheless, this was a great draft for TT.

    As a talent evaluater TT is one of the best in the business, especially as it relates to DB’s and WR’s. My issue with him is and has always been on a philosophical level.

  • JeffN

    Wolf was maybe better at drafting offensive line but terrible at drafting WRs while TT is good at drafting D-Backs and WRs.

    Still tho, I think once all the O-line guys get solidified in the same postions on the O-line and they get a chance to gel a lot of people are going to change their tune about TT’s ability to draft O-lineman.

  • snyz

    with the rumored positive drug test for raji, he could easily fall to 9 (obviously lower if confirmed true). although TT may avoid the risk, i don’t see him as being that big of a liability as far as off-field issues. him platooned with pickett would be huuuuuge at NT.