Thompson shows another side

Was that really Ted Thompson pulling the strings for the Green Bay Packers this past weekend? Even the Thompson bashers have to be fairly happy with what transpired in 2009 NFL Draft. The Packers ended up with two first-round picks who in my opinion will be starters on opening day. In B.J. Raji and Clay Matthews the Packers have the cornerstones for their transition to a 34 defense and when you add in Nick Barnett, A.J. Hawk and Aaron Kampman, the Packers’ linebackers are looking pretty damn good. With Raji, Ryan Pickett and Cullen Jenkins up front, the Packers are ready to make the switch with immediate results. Of course , improving over last year’s sieve won’t be hard to do.

I think Thompson was just doing what he always said he would do. He used the draft to build the core of the team and when that was done he was ready to make a bold move like the one to get Matthews. One thing about Thompson is he believes in what he is doing, he doesn’t BS you and he is not afraid of the consequences of his beliefs. Thompson  believes last year’s record was not because of a lack of talent on the team and thinks the Packers are going to be a contender. Thompson won’t say it, but we all know last year’s Brett Favre fiasco was a huge distraction and I directly contribute it to the team’s record. This offseason is the complete opposite.

Sure there are question marks about both Raji and Matthews, but there are question marks about all first-round picks. If you dig that deep into somebody’s history, you will almost always find something. Nobody is perfect. I like these guys and I think they both have Pro Bowl potential and will be with the Packers for a long time. One thing is sure, the Packers, Thompson, and head coach Mike McCarthy need them to be just that or the later two will likely both be looking for jobs in a year or two. I think they got it right this time and I can’t wait to see them on the field.

Day two of the draft was even more a sign that Thompson has changed his thinking toward this team and the draft. It was all need picks. Offensive lineman T.J. Lang will be given every opportunity to replace Mark Tauscher at right guard and I think he might even be the front-runner based solely on his competition. I think the same can be said for fullback Quinn Johnson, a bruiser who is unselfish and is a good fit for the west coast offense the Packers use. He loves to block and is a much more physical presence than any of the fullbacks currently on the roster.

A couple of other guys I like are Jamon Meredith, the offensive tackle from South Carolina and the d-back from Cincinnati, Brandon Underwood, just a hunch on the later. Nonetheless, it was a good weekend for the Green Bay Packers. Their NFC North rivals shored up on offense and the Packers shored up on defense. I like it. Hopefully some of the venom for Thompson will wane a little bit in the next few months so we can focus on the team and get ready for the 2009 season.

Even with rookie camp this weekend and OTAs and minicamp still to come, it is going to be a long three months waiting for training camp. But all of a sudden things aren’t so glum in Titletown. The offense is already in place with a young soon-to-be star quarterback in Aaron Rodgers and superstar in the making in Greg Jennings at wide receiver, a good running game and an improving offensive line. If the defense follows suit, good things are ahead for this team. You gotta’ believe.

  • JeffN

    Pete H, there was a small blip in Al’s write up about moving past the BF drama. Then one of the crazies on here used that as an excuse to go on a rant about BF (one of the excuse makers). Many of us criticized the rant and are talking about draft.

  • Matt Hayton

    JeffN-

    Are you calling me crazy?

  • Matt Hayton

    Reid -

    there’s no reason to re-hash previous arguments, but essentially that was a different TT drafting this weekend, and I think the main reason is becuase he is now 100% rid of Favre. And not that he has the depth on the roster he likes…in fact, I don’t buy the BS that TT needed to completely rebuild the roster. He chose to, because he wanted his guys in place. He has improved our secondary and WR corp, but aside from that (before this past weekend)…the impact of the guys he “has rebuilt the roster” with have had a minimal impact…look at the DL, LB’s and OL from ’04…the quality of players isn’t much different, in fact you could argue that it was better in each of those areas then, that it is now (again before this years draft)
    Here is a link to the roster from 5 years ago: http://slam.canoe.ca/StatsFBP/BC-FBP-LGNS-GREENBAYROS-R.html

    My point is if he would have made moves like this in ’05 or ’06, we would have won a SB in ’07-’08.

  • JeffN

    Did I not state it clearly enough?

  • JeffN

    If TT wants only his guys then why did he extend the contracts of the following players?

    Nick Barnett
    Aaron Kampan
    Donald Driver
    Al Harris

    I know there is several more but I really don’t feel like looking them all up right now

  • Matt Hayton

    JeffN-

    now you’re talking stupid to someone you think is crazy. You know what I mean. Of course, TT is going to re-sign pro-bowlers…my point is that he did a whole lot of rebuilding that was unnecessary… the guys he has brought in were a wash to the ones we had, in some cases worse, net, net…Colledge, Spitz, Moll, Klemm on the O-Line and Harrell, Poopinga and Hawk to replace Diggs and Lenon…

    That being said, I think this is a dead issue…and I am actually very excited about the ’09 season…TT had a brilliant draft and I hope it means atleast 10-6 and the playoffs.

  • Matt Hayton

    And since no one else is bringing it up…I hope to Jesus that Favre keeps riding his tractor, since he just got his wish of being released by the Jets. Here is what I hope…I hope that Favre did this becuase he didn’t want the drama of being on the Jets reserved/retired list if Sanchez struggles next fall. That is what I hope.

    However my fear is–and it would piss me off to no end, and I would lose all remaining respect for Favre– if, he did this to in fact make another comeback and play for the Vikes next season.

  • Michael Legat

    I agree with Matt Hayton…

    …when he says this is a dead issue.

  • packer_bob

    OK, time to tell: I haven’t liked TT since he got here. I don’t post that often but those I have made have been largely to negatively react to TT. I felt like he was ambivalent about Favre from the moment he got here when he should have been trying to build around him, I hated the Harrell pick, I’m still not sure about McCarthy,
    and I will go to my grave bitching about not getting Moss when we could have had him for a bag of chips.

    Having said all that, I love this draft! I especially like JeffN’s point about why to take Raji over Crabtree. As with all players only time will tell, but if he develops into a truly elite nosetackle the ripple effects for the defense will be huge. I always felt Gilbert Brown was an underrated facet of the D during the elite years of the 90′s and Raji has the potential to be Brown with some athleticism.

    Initially, I was wondering about the picks for Matthews but after some research I think he’s a good fit and give TT credit for going to get his man.

    I am also glad to see the Johnson pick up. One of the missing links for the last few seasons has been the ability to power run for one or two yards when we need to, and while adding Johnson does not mean abandoning the zone blocking scheme, I like the idea of big punishing FB that can knock blocks off leading the way on short yardage.

    So for now, I’ll give credit where credit is due and say kudos to TT!

    As far as Favre to the Vikings, I wouldn’t put it out of the realm of possibility, but let’s worry about it when it happens!

  • Bob

    Well the Talk about Favre going to the Vikings is once again out there, all these writers are saying this would be Favre chance to stick it to Green Bay like he wanted to do last year, don’t get me wrong I love Favre and everything he did WHEN HE WAS A PACKER, what about the chance for Rodgers and the Packers sticking it to Favre. Just because the Vikings might have Favre, doesn’t mean their going to beat us. I say Bring on the Vikes with Favre!!!

  • paul

    Iccy puss,

    There seems to be a couple of “Pauls” on this site. I, the paul that you love, I mean hate, is me…the small case p in the name. I just find it funny that I have not posted more than twice in the last four months and you still think about me, perseverate about me, write about me, etc. Thanks buddy, I did not know I mean that much to you. I have not thought about you…really ever beyond a post here and there. Also, I will always ID you as the puss or Iccy puss. I will try to find time to come back and knock you around a bit.

  • Jeff

    Maybe I’m alone in this one, but I think it would be fun to see Favre pull a Vinny and come back on a wing and a prayer. Probably not this year, and probably not as a season-long starter. But I genuinely like the guy and always enjoyed watching him play.

    If he decided to come back and landed in the right situation, it could work in the short term. Certainly, I’d watch and wish him well.

    Until he played Green Bay of course. I really don’t much understand the drama – at 40, he’s just another guy now. If he got his arm taken care of, he could probably be an asset to a team like the Vikings, but he’s nothing to be terrified of anymore. What’s to be freaked out about over this?

  • JeffN

    My issues with Randy Moss is… how many play off games will he help you win? Don’t get me wrong Moss puts up great numbers during the season but peters out during play off time. I’m sick of players that are say pass rush specialists, or players who perfrom great during the season but don’t perform during play off time. This young group of WR we have now will help us win late in the season, play off games, cold weather games etc. I just don’t see Moss being there for his team after a long road into the play offs. While I don’t thing Jennings will have the regular season numbers Moss has, I think Jennings will have bigger play off numbers and probably even super bowl numbers.

  • Steve Cheez

    Good point, Bob. The ultimate payback would be to kick his butt.

    Yeah, it would be fun to see him do well against other teams, just so long as its not against the Pack and it doesn’t mean the Viqueens win any games. (Except maybe against the Bears, depending on their records at the time.)

  • Bob

    The right thing to try to end the Brett Favre saga, would be for the Packers to sign him for a 1 day contract, and Brett retire for good as a packer, the way it should’ve played out before. And then we can all forget this mess with him as a jet, just like we did with our Great Reggie White when he played that stupid one year with the panthers.

  • Jeff

    As big a Favre fan as I am, I have to admit that he’s always been a touch to the adolescent side. I don’t think he’d be willing to do that right now. Give him a year to reflect and miss it, then extend that olive branch. Maybe.

  • Reid

    Bob – let’s all hope that is what is going to happen and he doesn’t embarrass himself any further.

  • ScottS

    I love the Matthews trade. I believe that since he and Kevin Greene are similar in size and athleticism that they went out of their way to get him for Greene to work with. I’m looking for the sack tally to start climbing for the Pack.
    I’ve heard talk of Pickett and Jolly playing end as well as nose tackle so with Jenkins and Raji there is a strong rotation for the defensive line. Fresh big guys all game long.
    If the secondary can stay consistent this could be an exciting defense right away.
    My two cents on Favre- if he plays for the Queens to spite the Packers he will be dead to me.

  • JeffN

    I’m looking forward to a strong d-line this year as well. Hell I’m looking forward to a strong 2009 play off campaign. Don’t mean to get the cart in front of the horse but we will get an immediate impact from the 2 first rounders plus the draft from the previous year 2008 will start paying some dividends in Josh Sitton, Jermicheal Finly, Jordy Nelson, and maybe even Breno Giacomini. Whereas last year those guys didn’t get a lot of playing time and this year they will. Plus with this whole team being young you gotta figure that guys from drafts prior will be stepping up as well. This is the year you will see a lot of players come out of the woodwork.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    JefN you’ve pointed out what I’ve been saying. The 2008 guys will definitely be better. The new guys no matter how talented will take time. I’m as excited as anyone about what TT brought in this year but let’s be realistic for a moment. New players at new positions, hell the entire scheme is new and veterans like Kampman are going to have to make big adjustments. If we had gotten a proven free agent 3-4 D-lineman it would have shortened the process. But TT apparently is building for the long term, so our thinking should be for winning more consistently starting 2010. Of course, every game next year is going to be an adventure and I’m not going to miss a minute of it.

  • Roy Jamison

    When making those draft type trades, there’s a little calculation to what that number 2 and pair of 3s would make in dollars compared to a number 1. As it turns out, this class will make more than last year.
    Credit to the Journal Sentinal
    “According to NFL sources with access to league salary data, the Packers’ rookie salary pool this year is $5,443,396, almost $1.4 million more than it was in 2008.”
    You wonder what Aaron Kampman was thinking when he saw our old friend Jamal Reynolds making big bucks and stinking it up while Aaron made the little bucks and made a difference.

  • Roy Jamison

    Of course, FAs have a tough time making a buck or/and the roster but I’m going to be rooting for this guy:
    Tyrell Sutton
    He is got a chance to make it as a kick returner I think. Size wise he reminds me of Darren Sproles.

  • TRIP

    The defensive picks in the beginning of the draft were cool, I just wanted to give Aaron Rodgers one of those explosive receivers, but Jennings, Driver, and Jones is a solid group. I think Raji and Matthews will work out though.

  • Roy Jamison

    Al, start putting footballs in your freezer. We’re counting on you to be our next punter.

  • RayL

    Agreed Matt Hayton – TT changed his draft philosophy this year b/c he knows he has to win now to save his %#$^^% job and if he did that from day 1, we would have won another SB.

    TT is a piece of ^%$$^ and cant wait to see BF end his career with MN by beating TT and hopefully running him and MM out of GB. Yes, I hate the man that much…

  • RayL

    I also believe that #4 to MN is a done deal.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    RayL and Matt if you step back and look at TT objectively you’ll realize he’s terribly limited and there’s is no sense hating him for it. He’s probably doing the best he can. He’s afraid of free agency and in the NFL there are few good trades so he has to rely on the draft. He’s either cheap or overly cautious of aging vets like Sharper and Wahle and won’t go after a Gonzalez or Moss. I believe he misjudged the opportunity we had in ’07 but a lot of people did and TT didn’t seem to have any sense of urgency until this year(trading up to the 1st round) and after the 4-12 year( signing Woodson). The only way to tell if he’s cautious or just cheap is how he handles the contracts of the young players he drafted. If he bungles that we’re screwed. Keep in mind he’s lost two CFO’s for some reason and Brandt was really respected for his contract management.

  • Michael Legat

    Looks like the 7:00 troll train reached the station three minutes early.

  • Larry

    Michael Legat, there are those who are ignorant as to the reason TT was brought on board: To rebuild the team. We were aged at QB, DE, and others, and about to get there at OT and CB. Somehow, with a hell of a lot of luck, we came up with a 13-3 yr which sent our hopes soaring that we achieved the impossible within a couple of yrs. Not so, as last yr confirmed. The newbies weren’t ready when the injuries started piling up. Well, here we are pretty much mission accomplished with the pieces in place which will field a completely new team from (5) yrs ago. A total roster overhaul that I for one think will be a better team than in the Sherman era. One that will win the Division in ’09. If I am correct we can now concentrate on that “elusive” FA that will put us into the SB just like Wolf did it. Certainly our team SPARKLES compared to anything else in our Division and the entire team will be about the same age. A few starters (OT and CB come to mind) will change but I think the replacements are now on the roster. New systems both on O and D, new personnel, and young fliers on STs. AND…………a few bucks in the bank.

  • Jeff

    As much as Ted Thompson rubs me wrong, I hope you’re right, Larry. Not sure I agree with your assessment of the team when TT took over, but I’ll keep my negative thoughts to myself and judge Mr Thompson based on the results of his team.

    Personally, I think the major improvement was going back to seperate jobs for HC & GM. It’s too much for one guy anymore – sure as hell Mike Sherman couldn’t handle it.

  • Larry

    You’re right Jeff, and Holmgren didn’t do too good with it in Seattle either. Frankly, the only one that I can remember doing it real well was St. Vincent. I know my outllook is extremely optimistic, but I just don’t see any other improvement in the Division to think we won’t win it. The Bearse have a QB, but nobody to throw to other than a TE, and they’re D has really slipped. The Vikes have a D as long as the Williams’ play, but a one man gang on O unless Harvin comes thru like an all-pro. But who throws to him? Detroit, well, Detroit is Detroit with a rook at the most critical position. Think back to all the knocks AR took at the beginning of last season, and he had studied for a few years even tho he hadn’t played a lick. I’m just a little surprised that the draft went as well as it did for us this year.

  • Roy Jamison

    After five years, you are going to have a big turnover no matter who is in charge. The Pack still works on a time line like any other team. Harris, Woodson, Clifton and Tauscher are on the edge of that time line heading out. And it looks like Tauscher is out. There is that bunch in between with a variety of contracts. Higher priced guys like Hawk and Barnett will stay, lower price guys like Humphreys and Moll may go. Green Bay still works at a slight disadvantage compared with big market teams that can make bucks from corporate America (read New York and Dallas etc) even in a economic turndown. This is just a different “model’ of putting a team together. Maybe in previous years you could take a “shot” on FAs and miss, but in these times you just can’t afford to miss on many.

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    Looks as if Favre will be throwing it in Vikeville, Larry. The good part about Favre is that he will want to keep his consecutive starts streak alive, so he’ll be out there every week, even if all he can do is lob balls to the wr’s. The team will have to take one for him if he gets hurt.

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    And why will the Vikes sign him………. business of course. He’ll help sell seats and jerseys, not to mention the extra publicity. He’ll easily take a pay cut, I’d imagine, to stick it to TT. And then again, he’s better than anyone they have already. Start picturing him in purple…………

  • Matt Hayton

    Larry Says:

    May 4th, 2009 at 9:54 am
    Michael Legat, there are those who are ignorant as to the reason TT was brought on board: To rebuild the team. We were aged at QB, DE, and others, and about to get there at OT and CB. …Well, here we are pretty much mission accomplished with the pieces in place which will field a completely new team from (5) yrs ago. A total roster overhaul that I for one think will be a better team than in the Sherman era.

    We disagree on ignorance…It is ignorant in my opinion to make a given team as the point of reference for both the team that needed to be rebuilt and the benchmark for which you aspire to become better than, which is what you said here.

  • Larry

    What? Ignorant is a lack of knowledge. You are right, however, in that the team that needed to be rebuilt and the benchmark (the team then) were/are one in the same. I repeat, what?

  • Matt Hayton

    KGB, Kampman and Jenkins were starters on that DLine, only KGB has been replaced and that was just last year. Also Cole and Williams were both on the roster, so in my opinion we were actually a young and talented D-Line, not old and needing to be replaced as you suggest.

    OL was Tausch, Cliffy, Wells, Rivera and Wahl…Rivera was the only old one in the group. Wahl should have been resigned and we would have been one player away from a dominant OL in their prime, so I also disagree that we were old at OT.

    CB – Al Harris was one of our starters and has been a 2-time pro-bowler since TT has been here. Obviously Ted brought in Woodson, but if Sherman was still the GM that year, he would addressed CB, since Carroll was a bust out of the gate. Woodson would have been a logical move for Sherman since he had no problem going after free agents. So I argue the Woodson move to be moot point.

    QB – Favre was 35 when TT took over. QB was the ONLY position we we’re getting old at…your argument has a swiss cheese amount of holes in it…only 1 of the 4 positions was old as you suggest. Not to mention guys like: Donald Driver, Ahman Green and Bubba “TD” Franks were in their primes and Javon Walker was a young and rising star in the league.

    Packers starters:
    OL – Tausch, Rivera, Wells, Wahle, Clifton: Rivera was old and needed to be replaced.
    RB – Ahman Green – prime
    TE – Bubba Franks – prime
    WR – Donald Driver, Javon Walker and Robert Ferguson – prime

    DL – Kampman, Jenkins, Grady and KGB – only Grady was old…
    w/Cole and Williams off the bench

    LB – Barnett, Diggs, Lenon – don’t think Hawk or Poppinga are better than Diggs or Lenon…

    CB – Harris and Carroll – obviously…
    S – Sharper and Roman

    In my opinion, we were 4 players away from being a Superbowl caliber team (1 OG, 1 DT, 1 CB and 1 Safety) …If TT resigns Wahle and Sharper, instead of signing Pickett, then signed Woodson, drafts Collins and Nick Mangold in the ’05 draft…this team wins a SB, as is, without him “rebuilding the roster”…

    But for whatever reason…TT had to go and rebuild, instead of reload…I’ll never understand why he passed on that opportunity (05-08 seasons) in order to rebuild for 5 years to get back to that same level, which is what he is hoping for in ’09 and ’10… the only reason I can think of is that he wanted to do it with a team he built instead of with the team that Holmgren/Wolf and Sherman did…becasue they would get the credit and he wouldn’t, and he was okay with that.

  • Matt Hayton

    typo…he wasn’t okay with that.

  • Matt Hayton

    Larry -

    so that post was too long, I apologize. Here’s my deal…I think all TT needed to do when he took over was add 3-4 players to the roster he inherited in order to make us a super bowl cliber team in ’05-’08.

    Agree or disagree?

    My point is that they were closer then to winning a super bowl than we are now and rebuilding the roster to accomplish that goal was not only unneccessary but a mismangement of a golden opportunity to capitalize on a roster loaded with pro-bowl talent…Tausch, Clifton, Driver, Green, Favre, Harris, Barnett, Kampman, KGB, etc.

    It’s comparable to Terry Semel not buying Google for $1 billion when he had the chance…opportunity was knocking but he didn’t hear it, because just like Semel, TT wanted do it his way…

  • matt

    I won’t be surprised if Harrell makes a contribution this year. He didn’t have surgery of his back, which suggest his sciatic nerve is not bothering him. Herniated discs are a common injury with young people because the disc is still flexible and fluid. It is normal for the disc to be absorbed into the correct position again, especially if there is no pressure on the nerve and no ligaments are torn.

    When older people herniate a disc it is a bigger deal because the discs are stiff.

    Redding’s philosophy should really help Harrell stay healthy and fit. I his philosophy will rub off on Hawk, because working out 6-7 days per week is completely destructive unless he uses steroids. He needs to realize less is more.

  • Larry

    Well, Matt Hayton, when you go to that length to prove a point I give you an A for effort. However, about all you accomplished with your thesis is that the Packers should have kept Sherman. To pick at your logic would take as much space as you did and in the end, for whatever reason, they didn’t win with that group anyway. Of the (10) pro-bowlers you cited (etc included), its my opinion (3) were on their last legs, (3) are there now, Barnett and Kampman are probably OK, and Driver is just like the Energizer Bunny I guess. You imply TT has an ego problem but yet he doesn’t write essays making his point. Still baffles me how so many of you take so many shots at the Packers and are still Packer fans. I don’t think I could stay loyal to a team that constantly did so many things wrong. That kind of frustration can’t be healthy; am I wrong matt? Sounds like solid data, lets hope!

  • Larry

    Matt Hayton, I respect your detail analysis and thorough study of an issue. I would think you to be an Accountant or an Engineer. One axiom I lived with when I was working you might consider: My “peeps” knew I never read the second page of a two page memo.

  • iccyfan

    Matt Hayton Says:
    “Obviously Ted brought in Woodson, but if Sherman was still the GM that year, he would addressed CB, since Carroll was a bust out of the gate. Woodson would have been a logical move for Sherman since he had no problem going after free agents. So I argue the Woodson move to be moot point.”

    I read your op-ed with interest until reaching this paragraph, in which you make four reaching assumptions about Sherman to make YOUR point that TT should receive no credit for the Woodson signing.

    I’ll take the opposite tact, with just as much basis in fact as yours (namely none), and opine. 1) Sherman didn’t see Batman as a bust and 2) would have stuck with his draft pick, so 3) there would have been no reason to pursue Woodson because 4) Big Mike was leery of significant free agent signings after the Joe Johnson fiasco. :)

  • Larry

    Interesting iccy. Matt Hayton thinks the majority of the team was in its “prime” and I think they were either “aged” or about to be. I think prime is subjective and age is fact. Just the opposite of beef, huh? One thing I’m certain of is that TT was not brought in to “tweak”. Which brings up another point; Did it ever occur to the malcontents that TT is doing exactly what the Packer brass (whoever that is) wanted him to do, whatever that was? I know we all have our prefered methods but there are many ways to achieve an objective.

  • Matt Hayton

    Larry-

    FACT: Harris was 30 (but has gone to 2 pro-bowls since) and Favre was 35 (same w/#4, 2 pro-bowls) when TT took over. FACT: everyone else on that list was 28 or younger…and ALL of those players listed started for the first 2-3 years when TT was here, many of them going to pro-bowls…he had an opportunity to pony up with those horses by adding 3-4 impact guys, but TT refused to pull the trigger on Junior Seau, Moss, Gonzalez, Adrian Peterson, etc. (could’ve traded up 9 spots to get him instead of Harrell)…which is why that group didn’t win in ’06-’08.

    I didn’t even mention Wahle who was also only 27 at the time as well…so if they were not in their “prime” at 27-28 and the old guys mentioned, both went to pro-bowls, then when in the hell is a football team in their prime, Larry? Walker, Wahle and Sharper also went to pro-bowls…13 players of 22 starters were pro-bowl players…

    As I alluded to last night, in my opinion, TT pulled a Terry Semel, who was CEO of yahoo, had the chance to buy google for $1 billion in 2002. But elected not to becasue he thought the price was too high to pay for a ready-built search technology and instead, tried to build a search technology on his own. Yahoo wasted 5 years trying to replicate google, while google was dominating the space and becoming a $15 billion dollar company, only 2-3 years after Semel had the chance to buy them for a $1 billion, talk about ROI! Same deal…TT had a ready-built roster…13 pro-bowl players on the roster when he took over, could have gotten quick and immediate ROI by leveraging those assets, but instead he began to unneccessarily rebuild a roster…and now 5 years later, he still is coming off of a 6-10 season.

    I thought it was the right move to replace Sherman, but TT screwed it up. He didn’t have to rebuild the roster. It wasn’t broken, but his ego got in the way. His only vindication now is to win a SB with these guys, because he has already blown an opportunity to win one with the roster he inherited.

  • Matt Hayton

    Iccy-

    I would agree, that was very speculative on my part and a poor argument on my behalf. I shouldn’t have gone there…please disregard

  • Matt Hayton

    Larry-
    tried to keep this post to one page length…good advice. I know I can be long-winded…I regressed last night, apologies.

  • Roy Jamison

    No matter if your the general manager who I will not mention till fall, or the hashed and rehashed Texas A&M coach, it’s all water over the dam. If you don’t win, the Not For Long clause in your contract kicks in.

    This debate reminds me of…..a little music to time travel in the past please…..using Wayne’s World method would work….
    A frequent feature of Update during this time was Count-Pointercount, in which Curtin and Aykroyd made ad hominem attacks on each other’s positions on a variety of topics. Aykroyd regularly began his reply with “Jane, you ignorant slut,” which became another of the many SNL catch phrases (Curtin frequently began her reply with, “Dan, you pompous ass”). Other popular running features were John Belushi giving editorials that usually ended with him working himself into a frenzy and stating “But Noooooo….”; Gilda Radner’s characters Emily Litella and Roseanne Roseannadanna.

  • iccyfan

    Good memories Roy! While there were many memorable SNL sketches in the old days (absent-minded Ronald Reagan simultaneously entertaining girl scouts and planning Iran Contra with Ollie North is probably my favorite), the most memorable single line was Akroyd to Curtain. She went first and his very slow drawn-out rebuff began with, “Jane, you mag…ni…ficient…ly ig…norant slut……” It still makes me laugh out loud twenty-five years later…

    That might have been 1984, the same year Lynn Dickey pulled off the best upset in MNF history, beating the Redskins 48-47 when Mark Mosely missed a FG as time expired! Let’s keep the good vibes goin’….

  • Michael Legat

    Hayton,

    We’ve bantered back and forth enough that I’m comfortable giving you some friendly advice.

    I do respect your opinion (incorrect that it may be), but you lose a lot of credibility taking for granted that any personnel moves would guarantee a past or present Super Bowl. Far more talented teams than your hypothetical Packer team have lost along the way.

    You’re an exception with your thought-out analysis, but I tend to immediately dismiss people who “know” their team would have won the Super Bowl if only X happened.