Here’s hoping Favre comes back

Now that word is out that decrepit quarterback Brett Favre is set to sign a deal to join the Minnesota Vikings, here is one vote hoping he does just that. Favre joining the Vikings would be the best thing to happen to the rest of the NFC North. The Vikings are a quarterback away everybody says, forgetting they have no receivers, either, but thinking Brett Favre is their ticket to greatness? Good luck with that. Ask Eric Mangini how that worked out for him.

Guys coming back and playing after retiring is nothing new to sport. Look at Muhammad Ali, Michael Jordan, Deion Sanders, they all came back and all pretty much sucked in doing so. The difference is all of the aforementioned came back because they loved the game, not because they wanted to stick it to their former employer. I mean, come on Brett, are you really that big of a baby? I sure hope so. I can’t wait to unleash Aaron Kampman and Clay Matthews on the extremely immobile Favre, in the Metrodome no less, where Favre just loves playing. I remember an old Favre NFL Films’ video where Favre would say a person could be “dumber than a sack of hammers”, who would have thought he was talking about himself?

I would love to see Favre sign with the Vikings, especially for a low-paying contract. Favre’s intention’s would be perfectly clear – to play two good games this year and who cares about the rest. If Favre could beat the Packers as an opposing quarterback, his career would be complete. Screw the Super Bowl, beating the Packers is Favre’s Super Bowl. Favre already admitted he came back last year to stick it to the Packers and their fans, but he had a horrible season leading the league in interceptions once again. It must have left a good taste in his mouth, however. Or maybe he is trying to set the interception record so high that it is even more unbreakable than it already is.

Brett Favre could have been the greatest quarterback in Green Bay Packers’ history even though he only won one championship, but he choose to stick it to the Packers and their fans instead. I for one hope to hell that Favre does indeed join the Vikings and he can stay upright until October 5 when the Packers visit the Vikings on Monday Night Football. My guess is Sage or T-Jack are starting by then, anyway. How would you like to be Vikings’ coach Brad Childress? Either you bench Brett Favre or you lose your job at the end of the season. Wouldn’t want to be in those shoes.

I know this is all pretty much speculation, and until Brett Favre comes out and speaks one way or the other, just like last year, this will go on for three more months. The good thing is this year instead of wishing Favre would stay retired, I am begging for his return. Probably so are the Lions and Bears. And just like last year the main reason we all know Favre is coming back is because he refuses to face the press and say he isn’t. This text-messaging thing is getting childish. OMG, BF is back! Give me a break. Go on record and end it if you are not coming back. He must love being the center of attention. What a loser he turned out to be.

A guy we worshiped for 16 years hates us.

  • Rocky70

    @ packer_bob

    You must not read a whole lot or you choose to ignore those facets of the whole Favre Affair that displease you. BF’s on record that he played last year ‘to stick it to TT.’ This to me sounds like a ‘petulant child & plotting revenge tactics’. How else can one describe his behavior?

    BF’s a self-centered diva who has exposed himself as just another jock who’s in it for himself. He doesn’t give a rat’s ass about his apologetic fans. Eventually you’ll realize this & quit kowtowing to his tainted legacy.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Rocky 70, I’ll never get your vitriol. Didn’t he play hard enough for you. If #4′s legacy is “tainted” maybe you would consider giving back all those wins, like they’re talking about with Manny Ramirez in Boston?

  • KW

    I think he has a lot more injury to his shoulder than he’s admitting to and doubt he’ll return to the sport. This is probably just some type of hype on Favre’s part to create a little more animosity towards TT. TT refused to allow him to play in Minny. So Favre wanted to play there, if for no other reason, just to spite TT. He never wanted to play for the Jets, but in the end, they were the one team who would take him. He started out OK but then his shoulder went. Maybe he saw this as a plus? If he continued to play and was bad enough, he’d get cut at the end of the season which would allow him to sign with any team he wanted. It would get everyone all wound-up (again) if he started a rumor about playing for the Vikings. People would get upset and start blaming TT all-over-again. Favre can’t win the war between him and TT, but he can make TT’s life a little more uncomfortable for a little longer.

  • packer_bob

    He played in New York last year to stick it to TT? How exactly does that work? They didn’t even play the Packers last year. I guess he really showed, TT, huh?

    I saw Favre on Greta last year, saw a whole bunch of his interviews in New York, and don’t remember him saying I’m here to show Ted Thompson up. Provide the quote in full context if you want me to comment on it. I do seem to remember him making a comment to Greta, something like initially his feeling was if the Packers didn’t want him that we would like to play in the division against him, but he want on to qualify that. Also, I think that’s a pretty natural reaction in a highly competitive field.

    My point is I doubt he has the Packers on the brain as much as some on here seem to feel, and doubt that he has that much since the time he showed up in NY last year.
    Most of the thumb sucking has been going on by the nits on this site who can’t seem to let go of their favorite toy.

  • ScottS

    I think we’re all closer to being on the same page than it looks. I don’t despise Favre now because I don’t know what’s motivating him. BUT if it comes out that he really does hate the Packers and really does want to “stick it” to them THEN I will despise him. I do think it’s sad that he couldn’t retire with a great legacy and millions of adoring Packer fans and now only time will tell what his legacy will be. I want to be proud of Favre, not embarassed by him.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Fact is Rocky, you’re the one who’s sounding self-centered and petulant. You’ve already plotted your revenge, haven’t you. And, I’m sure he doesn’t give a rats ass for people that don’t appreciate that he EARNED everything he’s accomplished. As far as sticking it to TT you’re choosing to ignore the fact that most people are motivated by showing people that dump them they made a mistake, maybe you’re an exception but you sound pretty vengeful to me.

  • Rocky70

    @ packer_bob

    “Part of me coming back last year, I have to admit now, was sticking it to Ted,” Favre told SI.com in February.

    A Jets executive said at the Senior Bowl in January that Favre’s feelings toward Thompson were well known around the organization.

    “Boy, does Favre have it bad out bad for Thompson,” the source said then. “He talked about the Packers all the time. He’s obsessed with them. I don’t know if he’s ever going to let it go.”

    http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/44423352.html

    Like I said earlier. You need to read more or quit being selective in your facts.

  • Rocky70

    @ Mark

    You have revenge confused with truth. If you’re happy with only those “fluffy feel good memories” of BF, more power to you. Not all people live in a fantasy world protected by their illusions of what they think to be truth. Some of us want to know the actual truth.

    BF’s fall from grace is a self-inflicted wound. It has nothing to do with me.

  • packer_bob

    So what does that mean–he wanted to prove he could play? I guess I still can’t tell what that means, sticking it to Thompson, by playing in New York. Does he mean he wanted to demonstrate he could still play at a high level and he didn’t think Thompson thought he could? Does he mean “stick it to Thompson” by forcing Ted to deal him once they decided “the train had left the station.” And the rest of that crap is unnamed sources, so I don’t know how much credibility to give that.

    At any rate, it still misses the point. I don’t give a crap if he wants to stick it to Thompson, McCarthy, you, whoever. His reasons are his, we chose to go another direction, so I don’t see where the Packers as an organization or the fans should have any concern about where he ends up or what he does. I’ll always love Favre as a fan, and if he chooses to play somewhere I’ll be more inclined to watch that team when they play, because he is fun to watch and always gives 100 percent. Or should I gripe about what a prima donna he is for choosing to play, I mean imagine the nerve of that guy!

    I don’t know what your vendetta against Favre is, nor do I care, but “fall from Grace” puts you in the Al thumb sucking category in my book. I wish the divorce hadn’t happened, but it did and there is plenty of blame to go around. If it makes you feel better to pin it all on the decrepit quarterback prima donna as you caress your wubbie and look for your pacifier, then that’s your problem I guess.

  • JH4

    Everyone sure seemed ok with Reggie White coming from Philadelphia and help the team win a superbowl and thats ok? Did Philly fans whine about it? Why is Favre so much of a god that he cant go play somewhere else like anybody else does. He’s a professional athlete and he’s no different.

  • Rocky70

    @ packer_bob

    Do a little research. When you’re more knowledgeable concerning this subject, come back. Then your posts may be more fact based & complete. Until then, you have nothing to offer to this discussion.

  • Jackson

    Rocky,
    Your posts lack knowledgeable content most of the time. Packer_bob’s posts are much more “fact based and complete” than anything I have seen from you. When you get personal and insult the writer, it is usually an indication you are losing the debate. Your insecurity does not flatter you. Grow up!

  • Larry

    Oh great, how childish! Here is a FACT; everybody who has ever eaten a carrot has or will die. Hence, carrots kill!

  • packer_bob

    Rocky,

    This is isn’t a “fact” based discussion. My point is guys like Al and you that bash an all-time Packer great like Brett Favre because he won’t do what you want are way out of line and complete whiners. My point is we don’t have any claim on Favre and he can do what he wants, including play for the Vikings even if his sole motive is to drive Al insane.

    What is so hard to understand about that? You may not agree with my opinion, but “facts” (whatever the hell you mean by that) have nothing to do with it.

  • Roy Jamison

    This ain’t brain surgery. Those guys only make $250,000 to $600,000 a year. A top notch qb can make 14 million. Yup, it would take an average brain surgeon 25 years to make the same amount as an NFL qb does in one year, no matter how good he does. Meanwhile if a brain surgeon fumbles, he loses his license.

  • Pete H

    Look, Favre is my all-time Packer favorite. He has provided nothing but memories……some not so good, but memories none the less. However, if someone wants to bash him, it is their free will. As you say, we don’t hold any claim over him, just as he doesn’t over us. He is as free to be bashed as anyone. He has also put himself in that position these last couple years. It doesn’t, nor will it ever change my opinion of him, but every Packer fan is entitled to their own opinion.

  • packer_bob

    I completely agree, everybody is entitled to their opinion. I for one wish the divorce, for lack of a better term, hadn’t happened and would prefer Favre would stay retired rather than play for the Vikings.

    What gets my goat and caused me to jump into this thread in the first place is the knee jerk bashing of Favre BEFORE he’s even done anything and the 180 that supposed Packer fans have done on #4 because he wouldn’t follow their time table on retiring. Fine, someone doesn’t like that, that’s their opinion. But then to make asinine, belittling comments like he “fell from grace”, he’s decrepit, he hates Packer fans etc just goes beyond the pale. I think some of these a-holes have worked themselves into such a lather that they almost would prefer Favre had never been here to begin with.

    At any rate, the Packers no longer wanted him, so to me whatever he does is his business and I say good to luck him in all endeavors that don’t involve beating us on the football field.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Packer-bob, I agree. #4 going to another team hurts but we should just move on. He’s flawed, he’s older but he was a lot of fun to watch and cheer for. He gave us too many good years for the venom I see on this blog. #12 was ready to take over and #4 leaving was the best outcome for our future so I don’t feel jerked around like some people do. I’m not proud of my post to Rocky 70, sorry.

  • iccyfan

    Mark Says: “#12 was ready to take over and #4 leaving was the best outcome for our future”
    ““““““““““““““““““““““““
    Therein lies the crux of the entire argument. You state it in a matter of fact manner, but it was argued before, during and after the season! If only it were so simple, but it never is when a “legend” leaves and this one is particularly complicated….

  • Roy Jamison

    The Last Time The Legend Won a Super Bowl at age 27….(use the Wayne’s World flashback music if you want)
    Super Bowl XXXI was an American football game played on January 26, 1997 at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana to decide the National Football League (NFL) champion following the 1996 regular season. The National Football Conference (NFC) champion Green Bay Packers (16-3) defeated the American Football Conference (AFC) champion New England Patriots (13-6), 35–21. This was the Packers’ third overall Super Bowl victory, and their first one since Super Bowl II. The Packers also extended its league record for the most overall NFL championships to 12.(and holding)

    Interesting Facts about the legend…
    Favre was born in Gulfport, Mississippi, and raised in the small town of Kiln. He is of French and Choctaw ancestry; one of his paternal grandparents was a Native American affiliated with the Choctaw. He was the second of four children and attended Hancock North Central High School where he played baseball and football. Favre started for the Hancock North Central baseball team as an eighth–grader and earned five varsity letters. He played quarterback, lineman, strong safety, placekicker and punter in a primarily option, run-oriented offense coached by his father, Irvin Favre.

    Irvin Favre said he knew his son had a great arm but also knew that the school was blessed with good running backs. As a result, in the three years Brett was on the team, his father ran a run-oriented offense called the wishbone. Favre rarely threw more than five passes in a game.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    iccy, I believe #4 could have won a couple more games, especially because MM wouldn’t have taken the ball out of his hands in the final minutes like he did to #12. But #4 couldn’t have fixed our special teams or D-line which were collapsing. He might have just masked our problems. We wouldn’t have gotten Raji and Matthews and might have held onto the D coaches. Meanwhile #12 might have held out and certainly wouldn’t have gotten the reps he needs.

  • JeffN

    Mark, the things you state are the reasons I don’t think people should so pissed off about 6-10. Gotta take the good with the bad. Had we gone 8-8 or 9-7 we might still be sitting with Bob Sanders instead of Dom Capers. Alos from this draft we would of gotten 1 player from of the middle of round 1 instead of Raji and Mathews. So basically we would be set for several more 8-8 or 9-7 seasons instead I think we are headed for some pretty serious play off action with these 3 major changes on defense. It’s all about taking the good with the bad. That’s the NFL.

  • packer_bob

    Just to play devil’s advocate, then I assume if we don’t see “serious play off action” this season you would be OK with pulling the plug on TT? I realize that even if we go 6-10 again this season it probably won’t happen as he got an extension. I’m just asking.

    Taking all the post 07 season Favre drama out of the equation, I know when we lost the NFC championship I felt 1.) There was no way Favre would retire and 2.) That we would compete at that level again in 2008. I’m not saying go 13-3 again necessarily, just that we would have a legitimate shot at getting to Super Bowl. I’m sure many others here felt the same way. So I’m just curious how much slack others feel TT should be cut if say we don’t make the playoffs this year.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    packer_bob, I didn’t think we would fall that far unless #12 got hurt and he seemed more fragile than it turned out. Looking back TT didn’t bring in any starters last year and lost C. Williams, KGB and Jenkins on top of the punter deal which I still don’t get. I think this year we’re still relying on rookies and young players too much so I’m willing to give TT a pass this year on playoffs if I see improvement. But if he screws up the contracts on the new players like he did with Grant, he better get someone more persuasive than Ari Fleischer to cover his ass.

  • JeffN

    I’m so certain that the Pack is going to have a great year this year I’m not even concerned about anyone in the Packers organization being on a short leash. Let’s face it when the Pack was 13-3 they were good but not quit as good as 13-3. When their D-Line collapsed and had a bunch of other injuries they had a drop off but were not quit as bad as 6-10. They made bold moves this off season by fixing all the things that were keeping us average or somewhat average. Like new D-coordinator, new interior stud in BJ Raji, they have addressed their pass rush with Clay Mathews. I also seriously think that the reason they had so many injuries last season is because of the strength and conditioning coach Rock Gullickson who is no longer with the team. I mean they didn’t fire him for no reason. Just having addressed the D-Line is going make a massive difference on the win loss record. And anyone who thinks that BJ Raji won’t make an immediate impact his rookie year is mistaken.

  • packer_bob

    I love this draft also, and agree that players like Raji and Mathews could be impact players right from the start. That and what I consider a pretty light schedule prior to late in the year give us an excellent chance to make the playoffs.

    But then again, I’d have bet money we would have made the playoffs last year, epecially if you had told me ahead of time Rodgers numbers for the year. I am stoked about the potential we have moving forward, but there is always a vast chasm between potential and getting it done. Same for the change to 3-4, coaching changes etc.

    As far as Gullickson and the other coaches that were gotten rid of, they weren’t hired for no reason either. I’m just wondering if we don’t see big improvement this year (and I think we will), what then? Hopefully my hand wringing will look silly by the time we’re on a big playoff push later this year!

  • Larry

    JeffN and p_b just summed up ’09 as near as I can tell. Next brouhaha being set up is TT mishandling Collins contract. I wonder is Collins that good to bring controversy? Was paid under 600K for what looks to be a super year. Next year 3.0M seems fitting as reward. On the one hand I see the picture of him bowing after the DET INT and the quote “I — played my guts out” (arent you supposed to?); on the other he goes on the Tailgate Tour. He now might skip the OTA? GB has dumped one-year phenoms in the past when they “demand” re-writes before completion of current terms. Dont know anything about his agent but I see storm clouds forming.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Larry, it’s not just Collins it’s Jennings, College, Spitz, Kampman, Pickett, Blackmon, Bigby, Jolly and others coming up. I don’t think it’s going to be productive to do the PR deal about calling players and there agents greedy and selfish. It’s better to address the negotiations early and trade security for money the way Brandt talked about. TT hasn’t got a great track record with this stuff, he’s lost 2 CFO’s. We’re not going to get anything back in free agency draft picks or the way TT works, players, so we better keep the ones we need.

  • Lew

    You people have no appreciation for what you had. Is 4 an egotistical a$$? Probably. Who cares. Because at the end of the day with the game on the line his teammates respected and trusted him. Did TT make the right decision last year? Possibly (although the organization handled it as poorly as #4). But you fools got so spoiled with winning that you forget why we were winning. And the #1 reason was Favre. Back off.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Lew, I think everyone knows that but some people’s feelings are hurt that #4 can even think about playing for another team. And, a lot of people, including Al, blame him for our playoff losses. If not every loss he ever had. I get nuts when I see these posts but I’m not going to change any ones feelings so I’ve decided to cool it. BTW maybe I was prejudiced because he was a Packer and I remember a lot of fans from other teams wishing he’d get hurt(the only player I felt that way about was Unitas after he came back and beat us, I’m ashamed to admit) but I really enjoyed watching him play.

  • JeffN

    People keep saying the Pack mishandled the Favre thing last year? What specifically did they mishandle? or handle incorrectly?

  • packer_bob

    First off, I believe Thompson mishandled the Favre thing from the moment he got here, not just last year, by going into re-build instead of re-tool mode. People can debate this all they want, but it was obvious to me and I think certainly became obvious to Favre over time, that TT was ready to go in another a direction from almost the moment he got here. If you agree with that, fine, but I think he probably paid Favre lip service and then did the opposite, which if you put yourself in Favre’s shoes would get old really quick and create an environment of mistrust. (Ex., Favre says he would like to keep at least some of the line intact when both Rivera and Wahle are up for new contracts and then both leave, Favre thinks we should pursue Moss and then we pass, etc.) I could come up with others, but I don’t want to make this too long. The point is if you’re Favre and you’re suggesting things and management does the opposite EVERY time, what are you supposed to think? I also blame management for poor communication to both Favre and the fans.

    Specifically to last year, I believe the secret to Favre’s retirement announcement, which surprised the hell out of me after the year he had, is to be found in Bus Cook’s comment at the time to the effect that they “didn’t shove him out the door but they didn’t open it for him either.” After an MVP caliber season, they should have went to Favre and said “Brett, we were this close and we need you back!” unless of course they didn’t want him. Which is fine, but why not just tell him that then? Instead they say we’d like your decision a little earlier this year and pass on Moss again. I believe from the moment TT got here he wanted Favre gone but couldn’t be known as the guy who forced Favre out of Green Bay, so he did everything he could to show Favre the door but always payed lip service to “of course, we want him back, it’s his decision etc.”

    After Favre announces his desire to return to playing for the Packers last year, management should have either took him back or released him imo. Instead it drug out and drug out, where they were still playing this game that they really didn’t him want him back but wouldn’t say so publicly. This includes sending new president Mark Murphy down to buy him off, the hiring of Ari Fleischer for spin control, McCarthy’s “the train had left the station” press conference, and the ridiculous press conference with all three doing everything to evade questions and not give a straight answer. Management felt he was enough of a weapon to engineer to trade him to a team they knew we wouldn’t play until 2014 or something like that, but evidently wasn’t enough of a weapon to bring back for us.

    Sorry this drug on for so long, but I wish they had just had the balls to say we’re done and give him his release or help engineer a trade to someone he wanted to play for. I know Favre’s been wishy-washy, but I believe management neve told the truth in this deal for several years and were very deceptive in what went down last summer, to both Favre and the fans. Also, part of managing is managing relationships and egos as well as making decisions, and the fact that the relationship deteriorated to the point it did speaks of their failure on that count.

  • JeffN

    Pretty hard to give a guy what he wants when he can’t make up his mind. Farve went on about retirment for 5 or 6 years… how do you work with that or make decisions around something like that? Looks like TT made the right decision to draft Rodgers and eventually go with Rodgers. Don’t see how you can fault Packers managment for having to work with that situation. Still don’t see how they mishandled it. They made the right decisions with a very difficult situation is the way I see it.

  • JeffN

    One more thing. You don’t make trades within the division, cardinal sin in the arena of football. You just don’t do that whether you are dealing with Favre, any other player, or draft picks. It’s just a very basic thing you don’t do in the NFL.

    In MM “train is leaving the station” press conference I thought he was pretty direct about Rodgers being the guy. Not sure what else you want from MM. From Favre’s retirement speach on he was pretty direct on Rodgers is the QB of this football team.

  • packer_bob

    Both of those guys were dissembling every time they were in front of a microphone. You can disagree if you want, but I am basically accusing them of the following
    1.) Not being straight up with Favre or the fans for several years
    2.) Letting the relationship deteriorate to the breaking point, I think because they wanted to
    3.) Making a bad situation worse last summer by sending Murphy to buy him out and not just saying “We haved moved on, here’s your release.” You don’t need to hire a spin doctor unless the story is one way, but you need to spin it another.
    4.) Being disengenuous in all their press conferences last summer.

    If you think it was the right decision to not take Favre back last summer, fine, but they never really came out and said that. Also, I’m not a big believer in this “they couldn’t plan without knowing what Favre was going to do.” How did they handle last year’s draft any differently after he had apparently retired?

    If you don’t agree with me fine, but you asked where they dropped the ball, there’s my answer.

  • Larry

    You know what p_b, I’ll (for the moment) accept your items 1 thru 4 as truth. I don’t blame the Pack for handling the situation the way they did and I still support MM/TT/MM. It still amazes me why these guys are here when they’re so volatile against the management. Since this is a new year, a new team, new systems, and dare I say a lot of new coach(s) how can you not support the entity. You detractors put yourself in the position of always having to explain yourselves by loving the Packers but hating who they are and what they do. How many downer posts have gone on to point out the lousy coaching, lousy players, lousy drafts, lousy management, and even “losing” the last two CFOs. Its like hate the sin, love the sinner; when in reality, even tho you’re supposed to, you really can’t stand the sinner either. Fair weather fans come to mind?

  • packer_bob

    If I were a fair weather fan, I’d have been gone long before Favre ever got here. We weren’t too good in the 70′s and 80′s as I’m sure you know. And if there had been websites like this one,at least in the 80′s, rest assured I’m sure I would have had my share of gripes.

    In fact, if you’d care to check out my post in the draft blog, I admitted I’ve been down on TT for quite a bit but gave him credit for a hell of a draft. So I will give credit where I think it’s due. I’ll always be a Packer fan no matter who’s in charge, but the person in charge doesn’t walk on water just because he’s running the Packers. That would be a rather silly position to take don’t you think?

    I started in this thread to respond to Al’s ridiculous comments, most of my other posts have been in response to others about things past. I’m pretty high on the team heading into this season, but no matter how we do I’ll always think TT/Murphy completely bungled the Favre situation.

  • Larry

    Fair enough, p_b maybe my last post doesn’t apply to you; also you weren’t on this blog (to my recolectrion) a month ago when the real venom was spewing. We are arguing opinion anyway. The facts are BF is gone and TT is in charge. Like it or not the team is the team – top to bottom!

  • Roy Jamison

    Packer Bob you said it as well as it can be said. To believe Favre was just going to fade into the sunset after threatening to retire for the last four or five years was very naive. I won’t beat the dog anymore other than to say …quoting from “Cool Hand Luke”, “What we have here is a failure to communicate.”

  • JeffN

    P_B, your 1 through 4 is all what you think went on behind the scenes and none of that is fact it’s just what you believe, so if you want to believe a bunch of stuff you are not really sure is true I guess that is your choice. The way I look at it is the Pack had a very difficult situation dealing with all the drama that came along with the Favre divorce. They made all the right decisions along the way landing on their feet with Aaron Rodgers. They also got a free ace handed to them out of deck with Dom Capers being available this off season and then a second free Ace from the deck with Raji available at #9. Gotta take the good with the bad. The divorce was ugly but we are headed in a very positive direction this season and into the future beyond.

    We can agree to disagree on how Packers management handled the situation. I was just curious on why people think it was so mishandled, you told me.

  • packer_bob

    I think 2-4 is indisputable fact–1 is more or less based on Favre’s statements, which you’re right, I wasn’t in the room with him and Thompson so I’m taking his word for it.

    Anyway, I’m pretty well done with this. It’s all water under the bridge at this point. I agree, they had to pick up Rodgers when he fell to where he did that year and he looks capable of being the Steve Young to Brett’s Joe Montana at this point, which is good news. So the future is bright and I am sky high on the potential of some of these draft picks. I think Quinn Johnson bodes well for the power running game as well as the ones everyone is talking about, Raji and Matthews.

    Looking forward to a pre-season without all the drama and as I said earlier, hopefully all this will look pretty funny come December with us on a big playoff push!

  • JeffN

    It is kind of nice talking about Favre with a different team or maybe retiring instead of whether or not he is going to be in Green Bay. At this point I think 95% of fans are ready to move on into this next season with the team that we have and be excited about it. Before we know it… it will be just like old times again.

  • iccyfan

    packer_bob Says: May 12th, 2009 at 5:53 pm
    “I think 2-4 is indisputable fact–1 is more or less based on Favre’s statements”

    You seem like a pretty decent sort but there’s nothing factual in any of your statements; it’s 100% jaded conjecture! Those of us sitting on the other side of the fence could insert Favre in place of TT/MM/MM in each of your positions and make a pretty solid case! You say Ari Fleischer and I counter with Greta Van Sustren…:)

  • packer_bob

    2-The relationship deteriorated to the point of divorce, did it not? And I don’t just mean not taking Favre back, I mean the bad blood caused with both Favre and the fans. Smart manager’s employ good communication with valued employees and don’t have these problems.

    3-They sent Murphy to buy him off, hired a spin doctor, and the situation drug out, did it not? Your first loss is your best loss–cutting him lose with the organization’s blessing was a better option for the franchise, the fans and Favre.

    4.–I guess this is debatable, but it was pretty clear to me they avoided answering direct questions directly. This is known as dissembling. Answering a question that wasn’t asked, deflecting, changing the subject etc. is tactic employed by lawyers, public relations spokesman, politicians, spin doctors—so guess how seriously I took the veracity of their comments. Say what you want about Favre, he speaks from the heart and actually says too much, which I think contributed to all this media brouhouha going back to the very first few years of “will he or won’t he” comeback.

    There probably isn’t a way to “prove” my case on 4, but at the very least they weren’t forthright.

  • packer_bob

    Oh, and yes, JeffN it is nice that we have no issues on our front. If Favre plays, doesn’t play, where, none of that really impact our future as a franchise.

    I just hope by the good old days you don’t mean the 70′s and 80′s–they weren’t that good!

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Larry, I wasn’t very clear in my last post so I’ll try to do better.

    Being concerned about the contract negotiations doesn’t = I hate the management which doesn’t = I hate the Packers.

    The reason I’m concerned is if we lose our players to free agency current rules we will get a fraction of their value(the bottom of the 6th round for Collins, if that). And, since TT doesn’t use free agency he’ll never get us back what we lose(O’Dwyer for Wahle).

    Letting negotiation slide and name calling players and agents isn’t constructive. It would be better to work toward something mutually agreeable early. If contract talks get to be public it’s already pretty late.

    I’m a worrier and this problem is the only one I see that could derail a very bright future.

  • Larry

    Judging by the PackerNews and Gazette articles takes I shouldn’t be worried about Collins’ attitude or desire to play for the Pack. I had to chuckle though, Mark, when half of the names on your contract list are people pointed to when the detractors attack TT for bad drafts. I don’t think your concern about signings equates to lack of support at all. Keeping a team together has to be as hard as building one, especially if the team is a big winner. While O’Dwyer sure didn’t pan out, I’ve never thought Whale was worth what he got. Sobeit, we all have our own opinions.

  • Larry

    The afterthought: The only reason Whale comes up now and then is because we haven’t been able to replace him, not because we let him go by being cheap.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Larry, Wahle just makes my point that we wont get anything back for anyone we lose.

  • Larry

    I just don’t think you lose anything when somebody outbids you. My point is that its the inability to plug someone else in that hurts. There is a pecking order in that skills make a lot more than grunts and to pay a grunt skill wages he’s got to be a perenial All-Pro. Sure, there are a lot of other factors that go into personnel decisions, and so many that we are not privy to.