Jennings and Rodgers a dynamic duo

The Green Bay Packers locked up their number two most important player this week by making Greg Jennings the second highest paid wide receiver in the NFL. I don’t have any problem comparing Jennings with Larry Fitzgerald of the Arizona Cardinals, all both of them do is make big plays. And in Jennings case, he has one of the NFL’s best young quarterbacks also locked up for the foreseeable future and nothing but big things can be expected of both. This has the makings of a record-breaking combination that rarely happens in today’s NFL.

This is another example of the Packers taking care of their core players and not risking money on over-the-hill or never-have-been free agents. Rodgers got his money last year, Jennings this year. I expect guys like Daryn Colledge, Jason Spitz and Johnny Jolly to be next. I think the Packers will hold off on Nick Collins, whose value has dropped with every day he missed learning the new defense this offseason. The Packers are deep in the secondary and unlike last year with running back Ryan Grant, I doubt very highly that they will give in to Collins. Colledge and Spitz are more important if you ask me. Keeping Rodgers healthy should be top priority.

One thing is sure and that is Jennings will not be an Antonio Freeman and disappear after getting big money. Jennings is a class act and sets a huge example in the locker room and on the field. The Packers certainly got a steal when they took him with the 52nd in the 2006 draft. All he has done from day one is start and average 16 yards a catch and hauled in 24 TDs in three years, 21 of them coming in the last two seasons alone. The guy is a big play machine and if he and Rodgers stay healthy the Packers are going to be tough to stop.

If it was my money, I’d lock up Colledge and Spitz next, and try to steal Ryan Pickett and Atari Bigby for a reasonable price and let Collins and Aaron Kampman play a few games in 2009 before making a decision. The later two are not happy and do not appear all that thrilled about the new defense, so no need to rush to pay those guys. If it turns out they excel in the new scheme then the Packers will take care of them.

Man I can’t wait for the season to begin. I think training camp is going to be very positive and expectations will be high as well. With all that has transpired since the end of last season’s disappointing 6-10 record it is hard to argue the Packers haven’t taken huge steps in the right direction. The fruits of their labor will not begin to be known for another six weeks, but as an owner, I like the way my team is shaping up. Confidence is high.

  • packer_bob

    Iccy,

    I think many of the “Thompson does no wrong” crowd use hindsight to defend him, ie. Rivera went to hell later so he was right to let both guards go, Favre hurt his arm and sucked the last 5 games last year so it was right not to take him back, etc.

    I can assure you, and my wife can attest to, the fact that all of the grievances I have were bitched about at the time the decisions were made, not later down the line.

  • Roy Jamison

    PackerBob, Glad you liked that article. It’s one thing for fans like us to say it was not a great move to dismiss a chunk of the O-line, but when you hear it from a guy in the trenches, I think that makes a statement. As much as things look like they are on the right track, it seems to me mistakes like that led to more losses…and more unnecessary O line draft choices than were needed. I still believe continuity in O line play is foundation for success.

  • Punk

    Whoa now p_b, “Thompson does no wrong” are your words, not the words of we who support Packer management of which TT is only one part. He does not exist in a vacuum, he is part of a team, get it, TEAM. Of course TT has made mistakes but I prefer mistakes of action, rather than, reaction always trying to make the TEAM better. I have never made excuses, I’m just satisfied that, overall, he has made more good decisions than bad and that he is as good or better than most GMs out there. These are business decisions that are made not emotional ones, and do no wrong and ego comments are ridiculous.

  • iccyfan

    PB – Hopefully your wife set you straight on the Wahle issue; no offensive guard in the NFL was worth the contract doled out by Carolina! ;)

  • Roy Jamison

    Carolina apparently likes to pay big bucks for guards.
    USA Today (2008)has a list of the Top 20 highest-paid NFL players this season, and Big Ben leads the way at a staggering $27.7 million. This list is actually pretty absurd: JaMarcus Russell is 4th at $16.8 million, guard Chris Snee of the Giants is 6th at $14.8, Tampa Bay center Jeff Faine is 14th and $13.1 million, and Carolina guard Travelle Wharton is 17th at $12.8 million. No Brady. No Eli. No Brees. No. LT. No Adrian Peterson.

  • Punk

    Probably rhetorical, but why in 90 years have we never had a “premiere” RB? I’m too young to know about Canadeo, Hornung had to share the ball with Taylor, Anderson too short a time, Brockington (now there was a pile pusher who destroyed LBs) maybe but a HOFer not, Levins a journeyman, Green (oh, those fumbles) hardly, and now Grant another journeyman. Our top players have been QBs (Isabel, Starr, Dickey, and Favre) and WRs (Hutson, Lofton, etc.). Heck, Isabel-Starr-Favre account for 40+ years of the 90. I can’t be the weather because Jim Brown, OJ, and Sweetness played in our kind of climate. Please Mr. Thompson, draft a LT, Peterson, or a Barry Sanders in my lifetime; I don’t have that much time left!

  • iccyfan

    Punk / Larry – I think you’re confusing Cecil Isbell for Arnie Herber. Herber played for a decade and is in the PF HOF. Isbell set some records passing to Don Hutson, but he only played for five seasons, retiring at age 27 to coach college ball.

    I LOVE Packer history! Johnny McNally & Clarke Hinkle should be added to your list of star RB attractions…

  • Roy Jamison

    I think Ahman Green was the best of what you mentioned. We could have drafted Sanders sure, but Tony Mandarich was the greatest thing since sliced bread and didn’t take steroids. Brockington might have been even more special had the Packers not literally run him into the ground. McArthur Lane and Brockington may have been as punishing a duo as there has been in the NFL. And, alas I had big hopes for Dave Hampton and his clutch on the football was less than spectacular.

  • Roy Jamison

    PackerBob, thanks for the link to the Williams boys. Ah, the Minnesota legal system. If Al Franken can become a senator, anything is possible in MinneSO-SO-ta.

  • packer_bob

    HOF’ers are a category unto themselves. They are the elite of the elite–it takes such a high level of play for such a period of time (at least as far as modern players are concerned–No more Gale Sayers type) that there simply aren’t enough of them to go around.

    I know you are just lamenting the fact that we haven’t had one of those once in a lifetime type running back since the 60′s (think how long the Bears have gone without one at QB) but OJ, LT, Sanders haven’t brought there teams any SB’s. Even Payton, who I still consider the best all-around back I have ever seen, got his one SB more on the strength of the defense than anything else. If Neal Anderson had been the feature HB that year, they still would have won it all.

    I think in the modern NFL, you need a well rounded offense and a strong defense. If the defense can be good and Grant can just do an imitation of Levens in his prime, the rest should take care of itself.

  • packer_bob

    Iccy,

    The only thing my wife sets me straight on is to shut the hell up about the Packers!

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Larry, I like the history too. Firstly Taylor was great, we were blessed to have him. Second great running backs aren’t as important to winning as QBs. So I’ll take our history over any other team and have fun watching Sayers(no titles), Brown(1 title), Payton(1 title), Peterson(zip), Sanders(nada),Dickerson(none) and Simpson(nope). Emmit Smith, Franco Harris and Dorsett won multiple times but I think the other guys were better and more exciting.

  • packer_bob

    That makes the point I was getting at Mark—greatness at running back alone means very little. The guys you named were part of elite teams that were stocked on offense and defense. That doesn’t diminish their individual greatness, but you’d have a hard time convincing me that say Harris was better than Payton just because he has more rings, although some seem to accept that argument for the QB position.

    In the current climate, I’ll take greatness in my QB’s and WR’s and a credible running game vs. the other way around. It’s too easy to shut down the run against even an elite back with no passing attack, witness the Vikes the last two years or the Lions for most of Sanders time there.

    My other point to punk/larry is the greatness doesn’t have to be HOF greatness. We were loaded with receiving threats in our last SB win although none of those guys were HOF caliber, they were merely great in their day and their prime. Terrell Davis would be another example of what I mean–dominant for a stretch, vital to 2 SB wins, but still probably not a HOF’er.

  • packer_bob

    Speaking of dominance for a short period of time, anybody remember Earl Campbell?
    Talk about speed and power! His battering ram style and overuse wore him down quickly, but for 3-4 years he was the most intimidating rusher I can think of.

  • packer_bob

    We only have the 8th best receiving corps in the league, behind not only the Cardinals and Patriots but teams like the Bills, Texans and Broncos if you believe Fox sports:

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9787230/Positional-Power-Rankings:-WR/TE-packages

  • Punk

    I thought Hasenmayer was nuts! His premise for the article was WR/TE combos and then picked ARI #1 w/ no TE. You guys are all right on the RB issue, I was just musing. I’ll tell you, though, I lived/worked in Ohio during Jim Brown’s run so saw him on TV all the time. Nobody, but nobody (well there was that guy that did ONCE, forget his name), that could put him down one-on-one. He’d give you a leg, and then take it back. Power, speed, strength more than shifty, inside or outside, complete. Then he retires at his peak. Back to the Fab5 I thought the article would be about the complete roster of receivers, not just the top two.

  • Roy Jamison

    PackBob,
    That Fox stuff is hard to swallow. Don’t know what their criteria is and I understand the Cards and Pats but then it gets dicey. I occurs to me we probably get an F rating when it comes to TE. Perhaps a coincidence, but when the Packers have had solid TEs, they usually are playoff bound. The days of Chumura and Keith Jackson are way back in the rearview mirror! I gotta get credit to the Cowboys who have somehow found guys that play that position very very well. Good at finding a seam and also at helping bail out their qb when he’s scrambling.

  • Punk

    This thread is getting pretty long, Al, but here is another topic to chew on while we are waiting for camp to begin………..Are Pro-Sports Doomed? What happens when contracts mean nothing? For years we’ve had examples of players holding out, etc. in violation of their contracts, but the counter has always been that those contracts have clauses in them that let mgmt cut the player at any time. OK, thats an agreement known going in and maybe there is some balance there in leverage on both sides. However, not to bring politics into this, but the GM reallocation of ownership completely destroyed the contract rights of the preferred stock holders. That precedent then leads to the Williams’ Wall situation. What that judge did completely abrogated the CBA wherein all player members agree by contract to abide by the NFL rulings (after appeal). If the government can ignore contractural agreements, and the judiciary can ignore contractural agreements, and I do not have to pay my credit card bill or mortgage, then what good is a contract? I always thought that Pro-Sports were based on a contractural agreement between the player and the team, but does that matter anymore? Men, I feel like that guy at the window shouting “I’m not going to take it anymore”, and I wonder what a handshake means now.

  • Pack4life

    Doesnt matter on WR rankings. Look at NE last year when Brady went down. Buff and Houston have big ? marks at QB and Denvers best Wideout doesnt event want to be there.

  • matt
  • Punk

    Wow, fun for the night but you’ll feel terrible in the morning, wow!

  • Rocky70

    Interesting analysis. Amazing how many NFL fans feel the same.

    Interesting quote from the article:

    “People show their true colors when forced with life changing circumstances. The good people will always do what´s right, what they know in their hearts is what should be done. The jerks only care about themselves. They´re shallow. Their motivations are strictly personal with no one else´s well-being in mind.”

    Sounds pretty close to me.

  • Rocky70

    Or this:

    “And sure, you won´t hear any complaints if he wins, which I think he will. I mean, let´s face it, the Vikes are loaded. They have all the tools to make a deep playoff run, and Brett Favre could, in fact, help them get there.
    But it will be blood money.
    Because Brett Favre is just using you, Vikings fans, for his own personal gain, not yours.”

    Face it. The guy has it spot-on.

  • Punk

    They could go all the way w/ him, but odds are always against any specific team. I hardly think that team w/ has the horses we did, nor the coaching. What you can expect is for him to get reckless with the ball, because thats the only way he knows how to play. I think he could have shaved for Air’s funeral; that kind of beard only takes a few days to grow. Pick, pick, pick, more power to him. Can’t wait.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    If he can suit up, I expect #4 to have a hot start and get worse at the end of games and as the season wears on. Who wants to bet on how soon he gets replaced?

  • Roy Jamison

    I seldom agree with Skipper Bayless but he might be right in saying number 4 won’t play this year.

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    I have to admit I have doubts now after the four-letter network report. In the same breath I want it even more knowing he can’t play. But having said that, has the Interception Machine ever backed down from a challenge?

  • packer_bob

    Hilarious article, just hilarious. Blood money? Like a prostitute? I’m still laughing, LOL!

  • roy jamison

    Matt, thanks for the article about numero cuatro.

    “It´s like dating a prostitute. Sure, you may have some fun for a night, but you´re going to feel really bad about yourself afterwards. “