Why I love preseason games

The Packers are about to open training camp and like every year I am fired up. That is the same with all Packers’ fans but what separates me from most is I love the preseason games. This year the Packers are returning something like 20 of their 22 starters from last year which means there won’t be many battles for starting jobs. The open right tackle position will be the hot one and outside linebacker will be warm as well. Most of the competition this year is for backup jobs and that means we’ll be seeing guys fighting for their professional lives in the weeks to come.

I love seeing these guys battle for jobs and and then trying to decide who should be cut and comparing it to who actually does get cut. Guys I’m going to be watching are guys like last year’s training camp sensation – running back Kraig Lumpkin, linebacker Clay Matthews, who along with B.J. Raji should get plenty of playing time in the preseason. Defensive lineman Justin Harrell, healthy for the first time in his life should be interesting to watch. I’ll certainly be watching the backup cornerbacks as Charles Woodson and Al Harris won’t be around forever, in fact it would be nice to see them get pushed a little to keep them at the top of their game.

I also want to see more of Jordy Nelson and he and James Jones should see plenty of action. What could hurt those two is once Aaron Rodgers leaves the game the Packers have very little at quarterback. I’m not high on Matt Flynn or Brian Brohm at all. I’m sure they can hand to Lumpkin and Deshawn Wynn pretty good though. In that same vein, tight end Jermichael Finley is looking to beat out Donald Lee has a starter but may have to make his move when Rodgers is still in the game and more so in practice.Needless to say the switch to the 3-4 defense will on the top of most peoples list of what to watch and is on mine as well, but the difference is I believe Dom Capers when he says the Packers will be ready to go opening day, no six game learning curve like I hear mentioned so much. In this case, however, we may not be able to glean much with the starters only play a few quarters together in the preseason. Still, seeing the schemes and how the linebackers play will be fun to watch.

My biggest concern is the same as it has been for the last 18 years, don’t get the quarterback hurt before the games count. It is always a fine line between playing enough to get the timing down and coming out to soon to avoid injury. Other guys that could kill the Packers season before it gets started by getting hurt in the preseason would by Greg Jennings, Woodson or Harris, Ryan Grant, and Chad Clifton, who covers Rodgers’ back. I would also be very concerned if Ryan Pickett or Raji got hurt. Pickett never has got his just do but he is a key player for the Packers’ defense. Raji has shown from the day he got here, no pads yet, that he is going to be starting somewhere on the d-line.

Finally, the best thing about preseason games is that you don’t have to get all nervous before or during the game. It is great to watch the Packers play and not really care what the final score is. Coaches can talk until they are blue in the face about the importance of winning every game you play but we all know these games mean nothing in the win-loss column.  So sit back, enjoy your favorite beverage, and watch the Packers mold their team into what I think will be at least a division champion. It all starts Saturday I’ll be there.

  • Rocky70

    Sounds like some are hoping for GB to fail in 2009.

    The problem with doom-sayers is that they always back themselves into a corner. They hand-pick & then high-light different stats or situations & then ‘demand’ better performance ‘or else’. What they fail to realize is that any NFL team can be viewed at this time of the year with skepticism or optimism. You can pick & choose any view you want.

    “Between the optimist and the pessimist, the difference is droll. The optimist sees the doughnut; the pessimist the hole!” (Oscar Wilde)

  • Rocky70

    Matt Flynn was a steal for the Pack in the 7th round. Anyone who saw him in the BCS Championship in 2007 against OS had to be impressed. How he fell to round 7 is a mystery to me.

    His problem will be finding a situation to showcase his abilities. Pre-season action can only take you so far. As long as AR avoids injury, MF will be on the sideline.

  • iccyfan

    Punk Says: “Well Matt, you and p_b are a great pair.”

    Don’t be too hard on them. You can tell from their writings they’re young men, impressed with themselves and yet to learn humility. They call themselves “realists” but some see their (shared) message differently; namely I read them as guys with an innate need to be right. If you say, “I think the Packers are going to suck, BUT I’ll be the happiest guy in the world if they go 12-4″, you’re playing both ends against the middle and you can’t be wrong. If the Packers go 6-10, Matt’s there to say “I told you so”. If the Packers go 12-4, P_B is there to say, “I hoped this would be the year the offensive line jelled and the young defense came of age.” To each his own, but it’s kind of a cowardly way to go about being a fan….JMHO

  • Lew

    Really iccy? You don’t think your hopes should be different from your rationale thoughts? Of course every packer fan HOPES the team will do well. Just not all of us think they will. How is this playing both sides? It isn’t and your post is nonsense.

    You mention the OL- I think this may be the biggest question mark on the team (other than punter). It was not a strong position last year and there are 3 new starters. Obviously MM agreed that it was not a strong point or we would not have 3 new starters (at position). It also makes sense to change based on last years showing, I am just not sure we are improving. Allen Barbre has been on the roster for 2 years but now he is going to be a solid RT? Maybe, but to assume this would be ridiculous. Sitton is the RG? We’ll see. Clifton is going to stay healthy? The man is breaking down. Love Cliffy, but it is clear that his NFL career is coming near the end. So you are right that a lot of their success will depend on the unit jelling which I have my doubts on, but if they do (which I hope) then the offense will be extremely potent. And fun to watch.

    Speaking of punter…really TT? I mean I do not like the man, but even the hard line supporters have to think that this is unacceptable. He has repeatedely neglected this position. In todays NFL parody, where every team except the Lions can beat any other team on a given day, field position is increasingly important.

    I am not worried about the 3-4 switch. I mean they sucked at the 4-3 and Capers was a solid hire and a good coach. I am worried about the talent level on D. Harris is old, Kamp is at LB, Collins is overrated…the unit could be good. I would not be shocked. But I am again leery. Call me a pessimist, but I just have a hard time believing something before I see it.

    I have more but am sick of writing. Cheers. Go Pack.

  • iccyfan

    Damn Lew! That was well done and exactly the kind of post I come on here to read. I mean it; I wouldn’t debate a single point you’ve made – other than my comments regarding Matt H & P_B being nonsense! I think everybody is looking to TC / PS for some answers to the issues you cite. Oh, and you ARE a pessimist…

    P.S. Parity or Parody?

  • Mel e Mel

    There has to be a decent CFL or free agent punter somewhere. More than 200 punters in college last year and hardly any were drafted so there has to be one. Capers is installing an aggressive scheme something we havent seen since the Fritz Shurmur days. I think the O line will be fine now, They didnt have any Tackles in the rotation last year now they have several. Tony Moll will probably be shown the door unless he can punt.

  • Punk

    There seems to be a consistant logic here in that the pessimists dwell in the past and that forms their outlook on the future. Conversely, we optimists review the past and form our outlook on what changes have been made to correct prior flaws. Suffice to say there have been, and are continuing to be, a heck of a lot of changes going on. It follows then that all of the criticism is totally based on past and not present. How then can one be a pessimist when the “bad” is past? Methinks, regardless of what they say, the pessi crowd won’t be happy with a Div. title and will continue to carp on what went wrong if we lose a playoff game. As to punter, these two will probably hang on thru camp because they’re directional and thats what MM wants after trying to go with the boomer last year. Remember the transition the coverage teams have gone thru this off-season; we now need direction and hang time not distance.

  • Punk

    As an afterthought, I’ve even seen posts here that are pessimistic because of the “change” itself, when thats what they were screaming for in the first place. ie: The troika makes an obvious change and the pessi crowd uses the change as a reason to be pessimistic………..can’t win. And, oh yeah, to the “win totals are the only thing that counts” guys. Doesn’t it follow that you don’t have anything to say until its all over and we know the end totals?

  • paul

    Will be at the pre-season game in Arizona. My friend is giving me his seats. I will let you know what section, number, etc., if you want to come by. I will buy you an 8 dollar beer.

  • packer_bob

    My concerns about the Packers in 2009 should in no way be interpreted to mean that I am hoping they fail. Nothing would make me happier than us having a successful season and a deep playoff run.

    But I call it the way see it and am not given to blind faith and starry eyed optimism for no good reason. Do we have the potential to be really good team? Yes. But until I see it on the field, that’s all it is, potential.

    Iccy, I’ve never said I think the Packers are going to suck. I was expecting a trip to the playoffs last year, maybe even a trip to the SB if Rodger’s could play well, and got 6-10 so forgive me for being concerned with the drop off. We turned over almost our entire coaching staff for a reason you know.

    For the record, I think 9-7 with our schedule this year should be a no brainer and am cautiously optimistic we could do much better than that if some things go our way. That’s why I’m saying 8-8 or less this year is completley unacceptable to me. Not sure how that makes me playing both sides.

  • jackson

    If anyone wants to come by is what I meant. Go Pack. I will be sitting in the Cardinal section with my Packer nation gear on. I have done this before without being assaulted too badly. Just a few minor injuries when the Cards beat the Packers about 4 years ago, third game of the season. More Packer fans than Cards and still blacked out locally. I would not do this in Philly though…might die there.

  • Roy Jamison

    Green Bay — It wouldn’t come as a surprise if the Green Bay Packers cut one or both of their free-agent punters sooner than later and start all over again.
    How come we can’t find a kicker…are they really that rare?

  • Rocky70

    Great comment by Mel e Mel:
    “Tony Moll will probably be shown the door unless he can punt.”

    It’s perplexing why an adequate punter can’t be found. I agree with the general attitude that the punting job may be had by someone tending bar in Philly at this moment…… I just hope that if these two dudes can’t do it, it shows early in the preseason so a search can begin before it really hurts the team.

    I feel better when I’m optimistic….. It’s also easier.

  • packer_bob

    “Just a few minor injuries when the Cards beat the Packers about 4 years ago, third game of the season.”

    Wasn’t that the really hot game where our bench was contantly shown on the sideline with A/C hoses down the there jerseys?

  • iccyfan

    packer_bob Says: “I was expecting a trip to the playoffs last year, maybe even a trip to the SB if Rodger’s could play well, and got 6-10 so forgive me for being concerned with the drop off.”

    Therein lies the crux of my “problem” with you, Matt and several others. Despite your best efforts to say otherwise, it always comes back to Rodgers and 6-10. The “if Rodgers could play well” phrase kinda tips off your ulterior motive…

    Cool that paul & jackson have already made a connection for the preseason game in Arizona; enjoy yourselves boys!

  • packer_bob

    Iccy,

    What in the hell are you talking about? What alterior motive?

    We were a play here or there away from a trip to the Super Bowl the year before, so it was wrong of me to expect some success last year? We had our first new starting QB in 16 years and I was wondering how well he would play, you find that odd or something? Wasn’t everyone wondering if he could play well or not?

    Quit trying to put me in some kind of box and please don’t put words in my mouth. I’m quite capable of expressing what I mean, thank you.

  • iccyfan

    Are you not linking how well Aaron Rodgers played and the 6-10 record? Have you not stated in the past you feel the record would have been different had the previous QB been at the helm? That’s my perceived ulterior motive to your message…

  • Rocky70

    @ iccyfan

    I’m sure you & others have also noticed another trend that pops up now & then. Some post about how they just want AR to win the close games & “finish the season 12-4″. They don’t mention going 3-0 or 4-0 in the playoffs to ultimately win the SB.

    Why is this?..Simple.. GB hasn’t gone 3-0 or 4-0 in the playoffs since the 1996 season. That’s 12 years. …..Why mention GB’s playoff ineptitude when it infers a truth they do not want to admit. …. Amazing how the battle continues if even discreetly.

  • Punk

    GET REAL!!! 6-10 was caused because we had 4 out of 5 WRs, a couple of TEs, a DE, and a FS healthy and able to start every game. Along with them we had a CB, a NT, and a QB who started every game, if limping through. Not to mention an out of shape RB running behind a patchwork OL. I’m pretty sure the PATs would go 6-10 with that kind of emergency room lineup.

  • packer_bob

    I believe I have stated many times my opinion that after the year we had in 2007 we should have taken Favre back when he deciced to come out of retirement. IMO we should have been doing things to make him want to come back as well.

    But we didn’t go that direction. I don’t lay the responsibility for 6-10 at Rodger’s feet, there were many factors. I wouldn’t say he didn’t have any culpability either, like some here seem to think. Essentially, I think he played pretty well and hope that continues. Do I thinkg we would have won a few more games last year with Favre? Yes, I do though I doubt he would have made such a difference as to get in us the playoffs.

    If you think I want to see Rodgers or the Packers fail, you are mistaken.

  • packer_bob

    Rocky,

    Maybe the reason no one’s talking about winning the SB is because we were 6-10 last year and didn’t even sniff the playoffs. You have to get there first before you can win.

    It’s funny, we had a nice little run going on about the 2009 Packers but you just can’t resist making a slap at Favre. You’re right, he personally was the reason we ever lost in the playoffs. It we didn’t have him we probably would have won the SB 10 times between 1992 and now.

    It’s hard to win a SB, Rocky. The Bears have won one ever, the Vikings 0, Lions 0 and that’s just in our division. I’m glad we got the one we got after almost 30 years with one total playoff appearance. I suppose it was Favre’s fault we lost to the Broncos in that SB too. And the time we lost to the forty niners when the ref blew the call on Jerry Rice’s fumble at the end of a game. And 4th and 26. I know he threw a horrible pass in OT, but if we hold on 4th and 26 that game is over. Your obsessive need to pin it all on Favre is perplexing.

  • jackson

    PB-yes, it was 107 degrees at Sundevil Stadium. I had to sit on the Cards side as GB sold out their side and I only went due to the blackout. The Cards got shade and the Packers stood in the sun. The game came down to the last play. After that, I hauled ass out of there but did take some high fives to the head as I was in Packer gear and the Cards were really bad that year. I think the Pack were also, it may have been the 4-12 season….

  • paul

    Iccy, I’ll buy you two 8 dollar beers if you show!

  • Michael Legat

    packer_bob, Rocky,

    With all due respect – PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let’s not rehash this Favre / playoffs crap again. This thread has pretty much managed to stay fresh and relevant and a good read, but if I have to read one more post about what Favre could have done in Green Bay last year or what his playoff INT ratio is, etc., I swear I will break a plate or kick a puppy or something. I can’t be the only one here who feels that way.

  • Roy Jamison

    Coaches who will be added to the unemployed roll after…possible during…this season.
    Wade Phillips..has run out of luck. Norv Turner, never was head coaching material and was no improvement on Marty ball. Marvin Lewis, probably survived only because he was still under contract. Brad Childress, he almost was the coach in Green Bay, and unless he wins the North, he’s going south. Jack Del Rio, personally I like Jack’s style, but he’s at the point where he probably has to win or that “marginal” fan base in Jacksonville will stay at home. Dick Jauron who beat out Mike Sherman for this job has been a consistent 7-9 type coach. Fans won’t like another 7-9 finish if they are that lucky against Pats, Jets and Dolphins. And there’s probably another 2 or 3 we can add as the season progresses to weeks 6-8.

  • packer_bob

    Michael,

    In the interest of your china cabinet and puppies everywhere, I assure you I have no interest in rehashing it anymore, though it’s tough to not respond when people basically impugn my status as a Packer fan.

  • iccyfan

    Thanks paul jackson, but I was in Phoenix in March and couldn’t handle the heat! I sat next to a Nebraska transplant (read Phoenix native) at a Cubs Spring Training game and asked him how he handled July and August. His response – we either leave town or stay indoors all day!

    I’ll leave Phoenix to you now and forever, but I will pay my respects to Flagstaff. I could see retiring there in twenty years, getting Northern Arizona season tickets and entertaining midwestern visitors with trips to the GC, Sedona and other area parks. I expect the State of Arizona is big enough for the two of us to co-exist….

    M. Legat – my thoughts exactly; I’m tired of it and not only has the paged turned, we’re well into the next chapter…

  • Roy Jamison

    Matt, your point number 4 is a disaster, has been a disaster and without a miracle is going to continue to be a disaster this year.

  • packer_bob

    Does anyone know anything about the punters we have in there now? I read on one of the practice blogs that McCarthy was not exactly impressed by the display of some of the punting in one of the practices.

  • Rocky70

    Most posts should read as posted. Reading between the lines usually only distorts the meaning of the post as intended by the poster. Some have that tendency to read between the lines & ultimately infer a totally distorted meaning to a relatively benign comment…. No one should have to walk on pins & needles in this blog for the sole purpose of pacifying the few………. This is a blog with the means to express yourself. We’re not sitting around a campfire roasting marshmallows.
    _____
    @ RJ

    IMO, Chilly has the preseason & 16 regular season games left as a HC. His failed flirtation with BF & a record of 7-9 in 2009 will seal his fate. The Pack is fortunate that he never landed in GB. ……….. Pertinent topic, pertinent post.

  • Punk

    The rose colored glasses are back on so the word is OPTIMISM. DET; How does Culpepper stack up against Arod? Or rookie Sanchez? Any wides beyond Calvin Johnson, any RBs? Have not heard anything about their D. Nah, have no reason to think they are better other than an added yr of experience. Hey wait, thats what I said about the Pack last yr, another year of experience. CHI; Don’t think Cutler to DB/KR Hester or dump off to Forte is going to get it done. D collapsed last year and is no younger. Big pickup Pace has one foot in retirement, and I don’t think Cutler is as good as Arod anyway especially considering the Fab5(6). That leaves the Bearse totally dependent on the RB, and that ain’t enough, cuz hes no Walter. Ah yes, MIN; Rather have Jackson or Rosenfels than Arod, don’t think so? Favre? Not with the 40 year old body, same as DET-CHI, Harvin vs our WRs? No way! AP probably one of the best in the NFC but……..he has to carry the whole load of the O again and thats going to get pretty tiresome, exposed, and predictable. Flip to their strength the D. This court mess is going to catch up with the Williams boys pretty soon leaving Allen the threat up front. I kind of like the fresh, young legs we throw at them once our new “beef” gets those first three games out of the way. Their DBs may well match ours but here comes our multiple weapons again and you can’t cover them all. What this all comes down to is that many of you are not impressed with our locals because of lack of name recognition through out the league, our youth, and last years record. Keep in mind CHI and MIN finished ahead of us mainly because of our downfall (yes, I maintain because of injuries) not because they were so strong and I can’t see for the life of me the great improvements any of them have made into this camp.

  • paul

    Iccy-I’m from Eau Claire WI. Love it here you just need a pool and adjust. No shoveling snow, but I can get to snow in 45 minutes in the winter, many other perks…and most transplants seem to be from the midwest…the type of people I like.

  • Roy Jamison

    Even tho the talk has turned from a former pack qb, I will turn back the pages only one more time to briefly discuss one of my all time favorites, Don Majkowski. The injuries wrecked his nice career.
    Majkowski’s success was cut short when, in the 10th game of the Packers’ 1990 season, Majkowski was injured when he was upended and tackled on his shoulder by Freddie Joe Nunn. Nunn drew a personal foul on the play. At first thought to be a bruise, Majkowski’s injury turned out to be more serious, a torn rotator cuff. The Packers finished the season using backups Anthony Dilweg and Blair Kiel.
    But Don will be forever remembered for that game winning pass against Da Bears. You could easity put him in the top four or five qbs in Packer history.

  • Rocky70

    Loved the ‘Majik Man’.

    If Infante would have given him a little more protection, he may have been able to stay injury free. Infante always hung him out to dry & it basically ended his career. Too bad because he was fun to watch. ….. People were originally comparing him to Montana in style & smarts. ….Saw him play several times.

  • iccyfan

    paul Says: “Iccy-I’m from Eau Claire WI.”
    And you’ve made fun of the fact I live in Iowa City, IA!?! On a serious note, I love that part of the state (Wisconsin). I have family in Chippewa Falls (on Lake Wissota) and one of my nephews “recently” graduated from UW-EC, where he played football for four years. Since you’re a native, what the heck is a “Blugold” anyway?

    To Roy – I enjoyed Don Majkowski but I don’t know how he’d be considered amongst the top five Packer QB’s of all time. I think we liked him because he was athletic and exciting, unlike Randy Wright, who was more methodical. My personal top five, and I obviously didn’t see all these guys: 1a) Starr; 1b) Favre; 3) Arnie Herber; 4) Cecil Isbell; 5) Lynn Dickey. I did this from memory and probably forgot somebody obvious…

  • Roy Jamison

    For those who have a little time on their hands and want to see a great punter, take a look at this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogdeHzBi4YM
    you might be surprised who you see in that video!

  • Roy Jamison

    Iccy, thanks for your input. I can’t disagree with you. It’s tough to compare eras but on pure stats Majik stands up rather well.

    Isbell Herber Majkowski
    5945 yards passing 8041 yards passing 12700 yards passing
    59 TDs 81 TDs 66 TDs
    52 INTs 106 INTs 67 INTs

    But, Isbell quit football at age, 27 Herber passed in a time where there was more running and Majik as we all know had a career affected by severe injuries. What could have been? Who knows? Thanks again Iccy!

  • Punk

    wITH stats like those I don’t think any of them, including Dickey deserve top anything. No wonder we were so lousy so long.

  • Roy Jamison

    Punk, I hear ya.
    Additional stats on:
    Starr
    152 TDs
    138 INTs
    24718 yards passing

    Dickey
    141 TDs
    179 INTs
    23322 yards passing

    Number 4
    464 TDs
    310 INTs
    65,127 yards passing

    Starr qb rating..80 Dickey 71 and Favre 85

  • Punk

    Thanks Roy, and I had Dickey up there W/Starr and Favre, wow. I’m not really impressed w/ yardage, attempts, comps, etc. simply because they are a function of time. TD/INT/COMP ratios, however, really show effectiveness. I’m sure I won’t live long enough to ever again see the likes of Starr and Favre. Man, I think we may have struck gold w/ Rodgers though. A little early, perhaps, but I think McCarthy can mentor him not unlike Lombardi/Starr and Holmgren/Favre. From that standpoint I thought Infante was like that after the CIN days. Wasn’t he the coach there when Anderson was so hot?

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Vick is the perfect TT player. Someone who has shown some ability who he can get at a bargain. Remember Koren Robinson. If he doesn’t play well we can drop him like Couch. I hope TT makes the move, we don’t have a good backup right now and no chance to run the Wildcat with what we have.

  • Roy Jamison

    Altho I’m in the minority, I’m in favor of giving Vick a second chance but I don’t think he’s going to get that chance this year simply because NFL teams don’t like distractions.
    And Vick would probably be better served if he took the opportunity in the UFL and then returned to an NFL team. He’d definitely get more playing time and not be in the spotlight of everyone scrutinizing his every move.

  • JeffN

    To expound a little on what Punk has been saying about the win loss column and changes that have been made going forward etc… I don’t know if anyone remembers my 4 week long pissing and moaning session about the defensive line being the reason we were 6-10 last year… I still think the defensive line was the reason we were 6-10 last year. With the addition of Raji, the return of Cullin Jenkins, the possibility that Harrel could be a force, and we also have Picket and Jolly as rotational guys on what is now 3 man front instead of 4. I believe that particular problem has been addressed. Now you throw in another major change like a top notch D-coordinator like Capers and boom you upgraded your defense big time. I think this offense is just going to keep getting better.

    I think we are looking at an 11-5 to 13-3 type of a season this year. Now don’t get too carried away on the record. The last 5 years have proven that any team that makes it to the play off can win the super bowl. Regular season records don’t matter that much… Getting in the play off and getting on a hot streak… now that matters!

  • Roy Jamison

    Punk, you were absolutely correct about Linday….Infante was the offensive coordinator of the Cincinnati Bengals in the early 1980s under Forrest Gregg. His Ken Anderson-led offense led the Bengals to the 1981 AFC title, and a bid in Super Bowl XVI. He left after the 1982 season to become head coach of the USFL’s Jacksonville Bulls. Infante also was the offensive coordinator of the Cleveland Browns during the Bernie Kosar years in the mid 80′s…I like Lindy, but like so many other coordinators…dare I mention Dom Capers in that group?…he should have stayed a coordinator!

  • JeffN

    Agreed, there are a lot of guys who need to stay a coordinator. I hope Capers stays a coordinator with Green Bay for a long time.

  • packer_bob

    “Getting in the play off and getting on a hot streak… now that matters!”

    Agreed. Sure it’s nice to have home field, but as we have seen the last few years it’s far from essential. Who saw Arizona getting to the SV at the begining of the playoffs last year? I damn sure didn’t.

    “there are a lot of guys who need to stay a coordinator.” Sure, Marty Morhinwheg leaps to mind for one. But some times the guy getting the head job has to be at the right place at the right time. Belichek didn’t do so hot in Cleveland, his first gig as HC. And what if Cowher had been coach for a franchise other than Pittsburgh, where they are very loyal to their HC. How many franchises would have given that long to finally breing home the big one? Not many, imo.

  • Mel e Mel

    Mike Vanderjagt, Tor K 18 130 5775 44.4 6 71
    Paul McCallum, BC K 18 127 5621 44.3 8 64
    Nick Setta, Ham K 18 114 5386 47.2 9 97
    Alexis Serna, Win K 18 124 5215 42.1 4 59
    Burke Dales, Cgy P 18 110 5043 45.8 6 68
    Noel Prefontaine, Edm P 17 103 4831 46.9 11 75
    Jamie Boreham, Sas K 17 107 4451 41.6 6 71
    Damon Duval, Mon K 17 81 3741 46.2 5 77

    Your CFL Punting leaders

  • TRIP

    Good post, just stay off the Favre topic and you’ll sound smarter by the moment (or post).