Offensive team meeting just talk?

In a season when we have heard a lot of talk about getting better from head coach Mike McCarthy but little improvement on the field, one has to wonder if this big offensive team meeting held Monday will just be more of the same. It sounded like the “airing of grievances” but it’s too early for Festivus. Will a full-blown bitch session fix the inconsistency of the offense and all of sudden turn around the pass protection problem? I kind of doubt it. If it does, great, but it should have happened a long time ago and for that there would be no excuse. Did it take the players instead of the coaches to light a fire under this team. Wow! I think I’m going to a disco tonight, it must be 1976 again. I’m your boogie man.

To me it sounded like a lot of finger-pointing, at least from the few details that came out of it. How can that be good when at least half of the problem is the game plan and the play calling? The most disturbing thing I heard all year was on Monday when McCarthy was asked how the Bucs’ secondary shut down the Packers. Even after it was clear the Packers’ receivers could not get open against Tampa McCarthy said “if we played them again tomorrow we’d go right back after that secondary.” Just keep pounding the rock Mike, you might find water.

What was really funny was that one of the quotes was from a defensive player who said the meeting was “good” making it sound like all the problems on the team were on offense. It wasn’t the offense that cost the Packers the game last week, it was a two-week old quarterback who ripped up the Packers’ defense, especially late when the game was on the line. It was Al Harris eating crow after taunting the Bucs’ QB all game. It was Jarrett Bush doing what Jarrett Bush does – give up touchdowns. It was the Packers’ blitz getting to Josh Freeman but not getting him down. I wonder if the “airing of grievances” shouldn’t have been held on the other side of the ball. Or maybe both.

Either way, I think the Packers will fall to 4-5 this weekend and we’ll see where they go from there with the 49ers and Lions following the Cowboys. We saw what happened last year at this time so confidence is not high. Since I’m on a Seinfeld kick, it is time for the Packers to do the opposite. So far pretty much everything McCarthy has done has been wrong, so the opposite must be right (side note – watching the game – wish the Packers had a kicker like Robbie Gould).

It has been an interesting week since the “Travesty in Tampa.” With eight games to go and low expectations, I’m looking forward to the second half of the season. I would love to see a win over the Cowboys Sunday which could be a springboard to a great second half, however, that wasn’t the case last year when the Packers’ ripped the Colts in Lambeau then proceeded to go 2-7 the rest of the season. This year will be the opposite. A Festivus miracle!

  • packer_bob

    Al,

    Great post! You’re completely right, the loss (all of our losses in fact) have not just been the fault of the O. The defense certainly bears some responsibility, and the reason they probably didn’t have a special teams only gripe session was they wanted to avoid a mass suicide.

    I’m shaky on the benefits of these kinds of meetings myself, and agree that it is curious that players have to call this kind of meeting to motivate themselves. Perhaps if we had Gunnery Sargeant Hartman from Full Metal Jacket as coach, the team would have had “the proper motivation!” from day one. I’m all in favor of a towel party for the entire team if it would help at this point.

    But the chips are all in the pot for this game, and maybe face to face accountability and hostility will press our performance to where it needs to be. At this point I invoke the dictum “It’s time to do something, even if it’s wrong!”

    So, we’ll see. Nobody saw last week’s loss coming, maybe we can be equally surprised in the opposite direction this Sunday.

  • oddball

    If all their heads aren’t facing in the right direction now, I doubt they ever will. This team has been officially embarassed – if they don’t come out breathing fire this week, they’re done.

    Tell you the truth, I don’t even care if they lose. I want to see some freaking attitude and motivation displayed. Tune Romo up a couple times. Run over somebody’s face on the way. Show me you’ve got some fire in your bellies. Play like winners even if you end up on the crappy end of the scoreboard.

  • monty

    Dear Ted and Mike

    Please do not feel bad about your inability to build a winner in Green Bay. Packer fans are use to being downtrodden. After the glory years of the 60′s and the retirement of another HOF quarterback, the organization wandered for 30 years in the wilderness as one prophet after another tried to lead us back to the promised land. After basking in the land of milk and honey for the last 16 years, the football gods cast out the Packer Nation for being fat with gluttony. It is not your fault you do not know how to trade or draft talent Ted, nor Mike should you gnash your teeth because you get out coached every Sunday because you do not know that in land of Lambeau you need a solid running game and guards who can pull and run screens and backs who can catch the football and follow the guards. But Ted you let the light of Lambeau blind you into not trading for Mr Randy Moss who if you had brought to the land of cheese would have caught many touchdowns and give us the golden fleece we seek so much. You blame Favre for throwing the interception that cost you a Super Bowl appearance, but there was no way that the young Packer team could have beaten the Mighty Brady because he had Mr. Randy Moss. Al Harris could not cover Plaxico Burress let alone Mr. Randy Moss. Oh Ted if you had only traded for Mr. Randy Moss all would be well in Packerland today. Maybe the next time you get a job at the top you will be wiser. Its time for you and Mike to go now, as the next team is here to try and right the ship and draft linemen who can block and pull and run screens, and trade for running backs who can follow the linemen to the endzone. Its time for the next duo to make their mark in Packerland and try and bring out from the wilderness of no postseason games back back to the land of milk and honey known as the Super Bowl. Good Bye Ted and Mike…it wasnt you, it was the ZBS and the 3-4 defense that cast you into the pits of losing seasons.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Dear Monty,
    “in land of Lambeau you need a solid running game and guards who can pull and run screens and backs who can catch the football”…”draft linemen who can block and pull and run screens, and trade for running backs who can follow the linemen” versus “trading for Mr Randy Moss who if you had brought to the land of cheese would have caught many touchdowns”…you’re really not as clever as you think.
    OxyMORON!

  • Steve Cheez

    Regardless of how disappointing our season has been, it sure was sweet to see Da Bearse go down in flames. Thanks, Jay, you are the new IM.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Yeah, Steve, another team just a Quarterback away.

  • Dan

    Bears fans are calling for Cowher. Browns supposedly talking to Holmgren.

    If GB wants in on the bidding, TT has to go soon. We don’t want to make the same mistake we made when we hired MM (offensive coordinator of the worst offense in the NFL, so we make him head coach). Could have had Sean Payton had we moved quicker.

  • Pack4life

    NOW MM has gotten a maintenance guy fired. Now MM is graduated to a full blown POS. Where is little feelings hurt? Lets make sure MM gets his binky and his warm milk and a nice blanky.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    You know what Dan, I think we would have had more Super Bowls if only we had hired Parcells instead of Holmgren!

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Quite a leap, Pack4.

  • packer_bob

    LT,

    Cutler had a horrible game last night, just horrible. But living in the Chicago I can assure you, nobody around here, from the fans to the sports radio loud mouths etc., felt the Bears were just a QB away. The line from the start on the Cutler move was “we’ve got the QB, now we’ve got to build around him.” They expected the defense to look better and thought they had upgraded the line

    I’m happy as hell THE BEARS STILL SUCK, but it is way too early to brand the Cutler move a mistake no matter how many picks he throws this year. That move should be judged 2-3 years from now, not this season.

  • packer_bob

    “Tell you the truth, I don’t even care if they lose. I want to see some freaking attitude and motivation displayed”

    My feelings exactly, Oddball.

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    That is the company line PB, but us fans can judge it right now. Big mistake. Cutler never won a damn thing in Denver and basically got Shanahan fired. Looks like Lovie is his next target. His attitude after the game last night was a joke. If Rodgers acted that immature I would be extremely concerned. Even though Rodgers hasn’t won anything himself yet, I still like his upside a lot more than a baby like Cutler, who just doesn’t get it. Never did.

  • Reid

    PB: “I’m happy as hell THE BEARS STILL SUCK, but it is way too early to brand the Cutler move a mistake no matter how many picks he throws this year. That move should be judged 2-3 years from now, not this season.”

    Kind of ironic how we give a rival 2-3 years to build around a quarterback.

  • PackersNYC

    It’s quite the predicament this organization is in. The team looked unemotive last week, and we’re all in the agreement that they need to be “breathing fire” on Sunday at Lambeau, or will it be quite obvious that the season could in fact be lost.

    Now, what happens then? Do the players officially give up on the coaching staff? I dunno.

    And in terms of a new coach for next year, TT could be talking to a few guys, but you know how quiet he likes to keep things. At the same time, this is a interesting period for him too, considering the level of talent on the field.

    Not sure about not being here TT/MM next year. Would Marky Mark and the ownership committe really be willing to swallow 18 million dollars worth of waste? TT at least stays I think, and probably MM too. Horrible scenario I know, but you need to look at it economically. Because face it, if you fire MM, take the hit on that $, you’re going to shell out even more for a Cowher or Holmgren. Shanny or Chucky might be cheaper though, considering their recent tribulations…

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    C’mon p_b, #11 pick, often compared to Favre, Mortensen and Jaws “best QB in the draft”, and DEN gave up a 15 and a 68 to draft him. Bearse then gave up 2 firsts and a 3rd and gave him a raise to 15M a year.
    You don’t think thats a team that doesn’t think they’re just a QB away?
    If not, I’d say pretty expensive for a guy with a 3 year record to look at.

  • packer_bob

    That wasn’t just the company line, it was the line from everybody on sports radio that I heard and they are from parrots for the Bears front office. Most of them recognized that the Bears would have to add some talent at receiver over the coming years, I think they’re all surprised about the falloff by the D and there O-line is worse than they thought it was going to be.

    If Cutler has an attitude problem, I would agree that’s an issue. I wasn’t making a comparison between Rodgers and Cutler, I think Rodger’s is clearly the better one. Just saying that no matter how bad Cutler looked last night, I wouldn’t be so sure it was mistake just yet.

    Reid,

    The Bears just got Cutler and had to give up their prime draft picks for next year to do it. That’s why I would judge the Cutler experiment two to three years in. This is year FIVE for both Rodgers and TT being here. Is that not enough time to have a team built around him, or do we need five more?

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Look out, Reid, you’re setting yourself up for the retort “TT and MM have already had five years”, so simple this is.

  • packer_bob

    LT,

    I don’t know what the feelings were in the Bear front office, but everything I heard around here had nothing to do with “we’re just a QB away.” I think coming off a 9-7 but no playoff year last year, most thought the Bears would be at least a playoff contender, and clearly they’re not. But most thought the Bears would give Cutler an extension to lock him up for an extended period of time, and then add pieces around him. They gave him the extension, so it sure looks to me like that’s the plan.

    Cutler may not pan out. Maybe he is a mental case, hell, I don’t know. I hope they have to put him in a rubber room, I sure as hell don’t want to see him succeed in Chicago! I’m just saying dismissing the Cutler acquisition on the basis of last night is just as asinine as looking at the TB game and making sweeping conclusions about Rodgers.

  • packer_bob

    Well, of course I was going to say that LT, but is it not a valid point? The implication is that we’ll give the Bears 2-3 years, but not grant ourselves that time.

    Well, that’s a bit of a specious argument when your GM and QB are in year 5 and MM has been 4.

  • PackersNYC

    From Peter King…

    “The Bears are in a vicious cycle: Because they can’t run the ball consistently, they’re forced to let Cutler try to make every first down, and because the defense knows he’ll be throwing so much, the rush can break down the pocket and lead Cutler to mistakes. How to fix it? The only way to put scotch-tape on it now is to max-protect more with an extra blocker on every pass play, either with an extra tight end or extra back — or both. And in the offseason, GM Jerry Angelo will have to spend every waking moment finding a tackle and at least one guard. Blaming Cutler is fine, and much of it’s deserved. But it’s also the easy way out. In football, it’s never as simple as blaming one person.”

    Now think about the Pack, and ask yourself; Self, if TT is still here after these 8 games, is he going to go out and find “a tackle and at least one guard”, in a possible uncapped year no less?

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    I supposed you’re technically right, p_b if your intent is to bash the Pack organization. But it is also a fact that Arod is only in his second year, right?
    Its all comparitive, and we can select whatever facts we want to support our case.
    By the way, how long has Lovie been there? I really have no idea. Just curious.

  • Reid

    LT – thanks, you pretty much summed up my response. Objectivity is lost in the need to bash the current organization. I’m not defending MM or TT, just would like people to play fair and hold everyone to the same standards.

    I’m waiting until the end of the year to voice my opinion on the MM & TT situations. I saw Sherman teams that started slow every year and then turned it on late. I will wait until enough games have been played to determine the outcome.

    Until then, I will support this team, the players, the organization, the head coach, and the GM, and really hope that the head coach can get thru to these guys and they look like they are prepared each week to win.

  • PackersNYC

    I guess I’m wasting my time…

  • packer_bob

    LT,

    No, AR is not in his second year. If you want to say he’s in his second year as a starter you’d be right, I just don’t much see the point in pretending last year was his rookie season. As a professional football player, he’s in year 5. Unless the Packers weren’t paying him for the first three, in which case he’s not too bright.

    Many in the Chicago area were ready to fire Lovie last year, and many more are certainly calling for his head now. I’m not trying to defend Lovie, the Bears or Cutler. I’m just saying I consider dumping on the Cutler move premature, and is as wrongheaded as saying “Rodger’s hasn’t won anything, he can’t come from behind to win, etc.” Saying it on the basis of last night is particularly knee-jerk.

  • packer_bob

    Reid,

    I agree, we need to wait and see how the rest of the season plays out. I haven’t personally called for TT or MM to be fired yet. I’m not especially optimistic about it, but there is still a chance to have a successful season as Mark Murphy said. In theory we could go 8-0 the rest of the way, but 6-2 would put us at 10 wins which would exceed my preseason expectations.

    A win Sunday would be our first quality win (for me anyway) and go a long ways towards indicating that maybe we’re not that far away. A loss, or a bad loss, and I think we go into a death spiral.

  • packer_bob

    PackerNYC,

    Good quote from Peter King. Normally, I’d say no, I don’t expect TT to pick up a guard and a tackle in the offseason, but assuming he’s still here after this season I think you might be surprised what you see.

    TT changed his m.o. in the draft this last off season, so if he’s starting to feel the heat, I wouldn’t be shocked if we aren’t a little more active in free agency.

  • Oddball

    I know a loss is a loss in the standings, but it’s not all the same when you’re trying to judge a team’s future. This year probably doesn’t go anywhere grand, so let’s try to figure out where we really stand. The Boys have a pretty fair team (gack, urp, sptht . . . ).

    In no particular order –
    1. Show up fired up
    2. Pressure Romo
    3. Protect Rodgers
    4. Limit penalties and ST farts
    5. Be competitive in scoring

    Do that, and I’m intrigued with the possibilities. Come out flat? Fail to execute? Get blown out? I think the boo birds get even heavier on McCarthy’s back.

  • Oddball

    NYC – As I think another has said, unless we just totally collapse here in the second half, I have to think Ted Thompson is back for at least one more year. Given that and assuming our O-line doesn’t mystically form into a cohesive unit, I think he damn well better be beating the brush for whatever help he can get at O-line and running back.

    But no matter what he does or doesn’t do, the final judgement has to be based on results.

  • PackersNYC

    p_b: I sure hope so. I’m in agreement with you in that TT did get a little aggressive in the draft, which was out of character, but given the circumstances, made sense.

    Oddball: That’s quite a list. Agree with all points, but I’m unsure if our Packers our focused enough and mentally grounded enough to play such a game for 4 quarters. But boy, do I hope so. I mean, the great teams in this league do 1-4 almost automatically, and the result I think is your #5.

    Let’s face it, these problems aren’t nuances with the game. They’re fundamental building blocks to creating a annually successful franchise. They’re the root of most, if not all, problems that need to be figured out by every team. And they need to be addressed in every facet of the organization; personnel, coaching, talent, etc…

  • packer_bob

    OMG, I just read about McCarthy and the grounds keeper that was fired. Makes McCarthy look like the Grinch who stole Christmas.

    I don’t know what was said or done, I wasn’t there, but McCarthy is getting asked questions about this when we’re about to be playing for our season, at home, against Dallas? Somebody made a piss poor decision unless the info I read is a million miles away from what actually happened.

    Let’s pray that’s the end of it, sometimes these human interest stories have a way of blowing up in the media, especially if it allows them to portray it in a populist outrage kind of way. (Coach on losing streak has loyal Pack volunteer fired for asking for team to take it to em, what a bastard, or some such variant thereof.)

  • Oddball

    Yup on the human interest angle of things – ya still occasionally hear about Dan Devine’s dog.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    As I reccall, the story about the dog wasn’t true.

  • packer_bob

    OK, I’ll bite–What’s the story with Devine’s dog?

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    A neighbor shot Devine’s dog because it was always on his property. It evolved into the dog being shot because of Devine’s coaching.

    http://www.classicwisconsin.com/features/dandog.html

  • packer_bob

    Jesus Christ, I just read we are 2-13 against Dallas in our last 15 games. I knew it was bad, but didn’t know it was that bad! Please, oh please, let this team get it’s shit together if just for one game to lay the beatdown on the Cowpokes!

    Thanks, Al, never heard that Devine story before. Real old school stuff.

  • zach

    Lol….McCarthy is a douche. He was solely responsible for the firing of the groundskeeper. The comment was made, “Hey coach, you got them boys fired up to kick some butt on sunday?” It wasn’t yelled, or voiced in a way that could be taken offensive. It was a friendly salutation pretty much. The man that said the egg laying part, he is still working there and isn’t man enough to fess up.

    Don’t for a second believe that MM is not at fault for this. It clearly shows the tensions inside the organization. Maybe if he didn’t suck so much, it would have never been taken this far.

  • MNFavre

    Hey LarryTex

    I didnt want to use the same words twice and I was just bored so i rattled that off. But it would have been nice to have both, guards who can pull and run screens with a running back that can catch the ball and follow them (our current guards cant do either and our backs cant catch the ball) AND Randy Moss. If we would have had Moss in 07, the Patriots might not have even made it to the SB. But who knows, lots of What if’s in life. It just feels like 1979 all over again plus a lot of other years between 1967 and 1992 (the Dark Years) and with the current situation, I dont see any white knight on the horizon for the Packers. Look around, O-Line sucks, D-Line sucks, ST suck, the only thing we have is good receivers and an OK QB but they dont have the time to complete plays….and we have no running game for the cold weather….look at our stable of running hacks, Ryan Grant was a one year wonder, Ahman Green should be doing color for a TV station, and Action Jackson cannot run…and forget screen passes (see 2007 Championship Game) the guards always get knocked down by the other teams players and we end up with negative yards. Screens are a basic staple to the WC offense. If you are gonna run it you need the right type of players. Ok enough said, if we arent going to the playoffs then I guess the next thing to do is hope for lots of losses so whomever drafts for us next April has a high pick to start over.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Al, great article about Devine. Living in Miami at the time we only got second hand reports. Making the Hadl trade, one of the worst in NFL history, as a lame duck GM is something I didn’t remember.

  • Jack in Columbus

    I met a psychic poet today. Close personal friend of Dionne Warwick. I asked her about this weekends’ Packers-Cowboys matchup. She said, and I quote, “Romo goes home-oh and smackers the Packers.”

    Amused at her wording, I pressed her for what she meant and she replied, ” Take the ‘Boys and the points, unless your smokin’ fat joints.” I then asked whether there was any chance at all the Packers could win and she quipped, “I’m seein’ your carin’, but there’s no hope for Aaron.”

    I bid the rhyming seer adieu, and then rushed to share this with you. It’s Cowboys 33, Packers 22. Sorry ’bout that, fans, poop-poop-a-doo.

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    Bulletin board material from Patrick Crayton? Hopefully it is not needed but here is what he said when asked if the Packers were in trouble:

    “I think so,” wide receiver Patrick Crayton said. “The president is putting pressure on the head coach. The coach is throwing his players under the bus. It happens. Pressure busts pipes. People tend to crack.”

  • packer_bob

    If we need bulletin board material for this game, it’s worse than I thought. As you alluded to Al.

    All the indicators are against us in this game, but I’m cautiously optimistic that maybe we’ll pull a rabbit out of the hat. Let’s hope so!

  • jonnyfootballhero

    I’m not positive, but I think Crayton has made bulletin board statements the last two times the Cowboys played the Packers…..Unfortunately, I can’t recall what was said….Didn’t seem to make much of a difference anyway.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Crayton is a backup receiver with a big mouth who returns punts. Lets just kick to him early and take him out of the game……..!

  • packer_bob

    The hour is late, I’ve had way too much to drink, so in honor of the Tennessee Tuxedo cartoon I just saw on TV Land, I’m going into the Way Way-Back Machine. Verbally I may be reduced to stuttering incomprehensiblility at this point (at least so sayeth my beautiful wife and current master right now) but I feel strongly that my synapses are still firing at an appropriate level and amazingly I still have the ability to type, therefore I soldier on.

    For those of you that enjoy this forum but are illiterate, I have posted a verbal version of this on You Tube. For those of you that enjoy this forum but are illiterate, and deaf, I have also posted a link to You Tube of me delivering this entire post via sign language, just look for it under the heading that says “I’m sure God Has A Plan In His Infinite Wisdon, I Just Don’t Know What It Is.”

    So anyhoo, this is from October 4th of last year, by me:

    “But the bottom line for the Pack right now is that we haven’t looked good, especially against competent opponents. We can’t run, protect our quarterback, stop the run, get much pressure from the D-line——oh, and we’re turning the ball over, committing a boat load of penalties, our new punter sucks and let’s see, should I go on? I agree with those also who have commented about our lack of adjustments and would say that in large chunks of the last few games we have been outcoached.”

    Sound familiar?

    Then somebody said we couldn’t talk about Brett Favre “by Packernet Law” on this board anymore. So here was my response:

    “New packernet law: Do not use the names “Brett” or “Favre”; in act, when possile avoid using the letters “B” or “F.”

    I we don’t eat the Atlanta alcons today, we will e in ig troule the rest o’ the season.”

    Sorry to subject the unwilling to this, was just running through old posts out of boredom and cracked myself up! I know it’s a little mastiburtory, but I’m drunk and in that kind of mood! If Al looked back to that time, he’d probably shut down the site again, so just take it for what it’s worth! (= not all that much.)

    Peace y’all! And let’s whip them Cowpokes!

  • Steve Cheez

    Thanks, packer_o, that’s unny.

  • Devil’s Advocate…

    That scout’s assessment of the Pack from the last two games, on the article page, is a good read!!!!! I’m a bit surprised by Colledge’s play considering it’s a contract year. Instead of landing a big one, he may be shown the door…. has looked like shit!!!

  • kevin

    If Pack doesn’t play well on Sunday they will get booed out the stadium. Milwaukee fans are usually horrible anyway. Take Dallas -3, might as well win some money so something good comes out of the game.

  • Bob

    Remember the movie the replacements? time to go to the nearest hell raising Bar and find us some mean hard core people, I’m tired of the soft baby players that we have on our team, with an exception of a few. Are offesive line are a bunch of Marshmellows. We need some character to this team, bring back Chuck Cecil!

  • http://www.myspace.com/themissingrocks DelawarePackFan

    Has anyone stopped to wonder if TT has been told NOT to spend in free agency and that Green Bay is in a rinky dink market and we will never be able to compete with the big cities in the league. Maybe winning the SB in the 90′s was a fluke that wasn’t supposed to happen. Are we kidding ourselves into thinking we will ever be able to hang with the bigger markets of any length of time. I am sick of constantly being bitch slapped by the Dallas’s and Pittsburghs and Philadelphias. Does our management just thing too small time or are we just just a small time farm state.