Chris Mortensen is an idiot

This rant may be a day late and a dollar short but I had to get it off my chest. If you saw Chris Mortensen on ESPN’s NFL pregame show Sunday you had to be shaking your head. Mortensen was on a mission to disrespect the Packers from the get-go and I for one wonder where this came from. A promise from the Favre camp maybe? Clearly Mortensen was not expressing a point of view, he clearly had an agenda during his segment when asked about the Packers.

At least five times Mortensen repeated the phrase “Brett Favre ruined the Packers’ season.” Then I also had the misfortune of hearing him on the ESPN’s radio version where he repeated the same phrase five more times. It wasn’t the offensive line or all the sacks Aaron Rodgers was taking, it was Brett Favre. Mortensen made it sound like the two losses to the Vikings have rendered the Packers obsolete. Unless you are a Brett Favre suck-up and/or work for ESPN you are certainly more intelligent than to make a statement like that. Clearly it was done to piss off Packers’ fans, which makes me believe the idea came from the Favre camp. Favre called the Lions last year to tip them off to the Packers’ schemes so this is right up his alley.

Favre is the Tiger Woods of football. You better be a butt-kisser or you won’t be around long. Favre made SI’s Peter King look like a fool earlier this year and looking back at that it now seems clear that he was playing him like a fiddle. The thing is, because of the publicity and the money these divas bring in it isn’t hard to find an enabler. In Favre’s case he was able to commandeer an entire network. I have hated ESPN for years because of their arrogance and manufacturing of stories and their insanely unfunny commentary during Sportscenter. They are the sports version of MSNBC, completely one-sided and will always twist the story to make their point of view the best.

Thank God the NFL gave us the NFL Network, at least we can get fair and balanced opinions and not 75 guys trying to jump each other for a scoop. Because ESPN is the only other alternative on game day and I like shows like “Around the Horn” an “PTI”, I can’t quit watching it completely, but thanks to NFL Network I have an alternative, especially on game day. I have two TVs going at all times so I do switch to whoever is talking about the Packers, which is how I caught Mortensen’s rant.

Maybe I’m wrong. Do you agree Brett Favre ruined the Packers’ season? The Vikings are obviously going to win the division but if the Packers make the playoffs I wouldn’t consider the season ruined by Brett Favre. Josh Freeman maybe, but not Butt Favre.

After watching the Ravens last night there is no reason why the Packers shouldn’t win their next three games. At home against the 49ers, at Detroit Thanksgiving Day and at home against Baltimore. The Packers have a second chance after beating the Cowboys, I hope they prove the four-letter network wrong.

  • Jack in Columbus

    Favre could not have ruined the Packers’ season because it is not “ruined”. In fact, the Packers’ season is far from over.

    There isn’t enough real sports news to fill the 24/7 news cycle, so hacks like Mortensen have to manufacture it. Professional reporting and objective analysis is dead; infotainment delivered by former jocks and wannabes is all the rage now.

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    Damn, Jack, you summed it up perfectly. How else are you going to fill a way-too-long pregame show? Nothing new in the NFL breaks on the weekend, so since everything has already been talked about for a week the spin doctors take over.

  • jonnyfootballhero

    Al,
    I think your hatred of all things Favre skew your perception of any Packers story that may be told in a negative way. Yeah, I understand that Favre is the title of the story, but to think he comandeered an intire network is ridiculous.
    However, I did not see the report nor do I believe that Favre ruined the Packers season. If the Packers go sub .500, then it was the the Packers who ruined their own season. We all know from last sunday what they’re capable of. They have enough talent to win any game they play.
    Al, just let Favre go. He’s no longer on the team and has nothing to do with their performance from here on out. Lets just be happy for the dominant performance they displayed playing the Cowboys and hope they can continue to do so for the rest of the season. If not, lets focus on what the problem is and hope to get it fixed for next season and realize that it’s not Favre.

  • http://www.packernet.com admin

    My point is why is ESPN reporting such crap? The Packers aren’t thinking that, the fans aren’t thinking that. The local media is not thinking that. Where does that come from? The good thing is the Packers kicked the Cowboys ass after he said it which makes him look even more like an idiot. And if you don’t think ESPN could very well be FAVREESPN you are not watching it enough, and for that I thank you very much.

  • Mark Troy

    I hope that dummy Mortensen feels like an idiot now because he sure looks like one after our Packers thumped them cowhumping girls! :)

    I wouldn’t blame Favre himself, just a sycophant trying to suck (up to) Mr. Favre and get his favor.

  • Sammy

    Al, green is not a good color on you! You really have a problem! That is Green with Envy….and red with hate. Everything has been said that should be said about Favre on all sides. Botton line, he is making TT/MM look like egomaniacs. Favre is a jock, almost all jocks are divas. Grow up and smell the coffee. Enough Favre.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    ESPN, ha. Rush was right; they didn’t deserve him, he knows too much football – albeit a little heavy a Steeler fan for my taste though.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Sammy, please enlighten us on exactly how Favre is making TT/MM look like egomaniacs. While you’re at it what is an egomaniac?

  • Mel e Mel

    Deadspin had a series of articles that told me all I needed to know about the people that work there. Apparently they cant keep their clothes on or hands off of each other.

  • oddball

    I can’t stand the sports media – bunch of self-serving jackals. Personally, I watch Donald’s show and then allow the Fox guys to chat while I shower and shave, mix bloody marys, slice up sausage and cheese and generally get ready for game-time company. If Favre has been the topic of choice on ESPN, it’s only because nothing else is selling ad time these days.

    With the Vikes playing as well as they are, Favre qualifies as feel good news. You have to admit, the Vikes going 8-1 with a 40 year old QB is an improbable run. He’ll be news if and when he blows up too. Just as they are lionizing him now, they will be picking his bones if things turn south.

    The best thing for Favre would be to have a career-ending injury right now – better than James freakin’ Dean. The Packers (not Favre) are responsible for us being 5-4. Mortensen is a dick. I agree with Jack. They’re just trying to fill time and mix up the red ants and black ants.

    Pissed off Packer fans probably mean lots of website hits for them.

  • monty

    Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy ruined the Packers Period, not just this season but every season since theyve been with the Packers. It doesnt even feel like the Packers anymore, it feels like two control freaks trying to make names for themselves. I miss the old Packer atmosphere with Bob Harlan, it was just different. Perhaps I am spoiled with 16 years of winning football. Mike Sherman was an idiot as a GM, but at least you felt they had a chance to win. Where are the Packer stars and studs? Besides Charles Woodson, we dont have much to celebrate. I think Clay Mathews will be a stud in the near future. I am sure all the young lady Packer fans love watching his flowing long hair wave in the breeze as he rushes the passer, but other than this we aint got much. You look at other playoff possible teams and they are loaded with stars, studs, not duds. Get rid of Thompson and McCarthey, then we can return to the way it was when Favre and Freeman and Bennett and Levens and Churma and all those studs were when we were winning. Need someone that will let Rodgers open it up and we need an O LINE that can pass protect and run screens and we need a stud running back (backs). We have nothing. Sorry but Grant alone cant carry the running game and if you saw the stats from the Dallas game, Green and Jackson ran for 11 yards on four carries. Get rid of Ahmad Green, he needs to retire and go broadcast Nebraska football. I dont give a crap about Favre and whether he is feeding ESPN, its like a spoiled child, if you keep giving it attention it stays the same, ignore it and it goes away. Favre is history, he doesnt play for us anymore. If he wants to grow up and go in to the HOF as a Packer fine, we can remember all he did during his 16 years. If he needs to hear his name a lot and have people kiss his arse, well thats his problem, not the Packers or their fans. A good Viking team beat the Packers, yes lead by Brett Favre. If the Packers had a better over all team like pass rushers like Jared Allen, a running back like Adrian Peterson, we would have won and all this would be mute. I put the blame where it lies for not having a better football team, at the feet of Ted Thompson for not drafting better, spending money on FA that could help us and making trades like the Queens did for Allen. Everyone that agrees with me should sign the Fire TED and MIKE petition that someone else posted here. Ted if you are reading this, Spend the money and get us some help already!!

  • ScottS

    Definitely a fine example of defeatism there Monty. I wonder why. The Packers have a winning record. Have you noticed? You want to sell the farm and bring in ‘studs’ to win now. You want to be focused on the present yet you dwell in the past and disregard the future. Your football philosophy is insanely ridiculous to me. Are the Packers really as bad as you think? Ted Thompson is building and maintaining a pretty solid team in my opinion. I have my doubts about the coaching but I feel the talent is in place and there is plenty of potential in Green Bay.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Al, maybe you don’t realize it but you’re doing the same thing as Mortenson. Namely making stuff up to fit your view and spreading lies. #4 didn’t call the Lions it was the other way around and he gave them nothing except a story for Millen to sell for his next job. The rest is just red meat that you were only too happy to bite on. I’m really tired of blaming our problems on #4. TT didn’t give him enough help and he’s not giving much help to #12 who happens to be playing great under tough circumstances. I hope the team is more focused on SF and improving with our young players than worrying about the drivel from reporters.

  • monty

    Dear ScottS

    While being 5 and 4 is a “winning” record barely, we do not have any talent on the O-Line or in the backfield. Ryan Grant is not the long term solution to having a solid running game. Of course, if we had a Coach who knew how to install a solid running game, perhaps Mr. Grant would be more useful. Show me the talent if Mr. Grant were to get hurt. Tell me who can run screens, a stable of the WCO, with the current O-Line and running backs. If we would have had a solid running game in 2007, we would have beaten the Giants and gone to the SB. The reason Favre is having such a good year in Minnesota is because he has a solid running game with Peterson and Taylor. Show me the equal talent in our backfield of Peterson and Taylor? Mr. Thompson has had several chances to get top NFL talent but refuses too. He could have traded for Steven Jackson but refused, he could have traded for Randy Moss but was too cheap and the guy we could have traded, Aaron Rouse is no longer a part of our football team because he did not have the talent to play safety. Tell me why ScottS our O-line has given up a league leading 41 sacks when said Mr. Thompson has had FIVE YEARS to put the pieces in place. As you have seen in the two games against Minnesota and Jared Allen, when Chad Clifton goes down we have NO BODY to take his place. Why did Mr. Thompson not sign Levi Jones as a backup for Clifton? We have no swing tackles to take the place of our left tackle. Right Tackle has been a disaster zone. What of Brian Bohem, a second round draft choice, and Mr. A J Hawk, Justin Harrel Brandon “Action” Jackson who cant run the ball, Patrick Lee on injured reserve, Will Blackman, while a good return man cant play corner to feed his grandma. Jarod Bush a huge liability every time he gets on the field. No Mr. ScottS, today’s Packers do not equal the Packers of the 90′s and this is what I want to return to and Mr. Thompson and for sure Mr. McCarthy do not have the vision or balls to build us a true winner, not just one game over five hundred. If we have sooooo much talent why did we lose to a rookie qb and a team that had not won a game yet this year?

    Sign the petition.

  • AATP

    Favre is dead to me and so are his stories – no matter who manufactures them… The Packers will continue to move forward from here regardless of the 40 year old diva. Sometimes I feel like I’m watching an episode of “As The World Turns”…

  • AATP

    Thank God monty isn’t our GM – we’d be screwed… we would be the Washington Redskins.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    If you want some editorial fun go to any of the BILLs sites today. Those people are copying our blogs.
    Many on this site have expressed the opinion that the SB is the only result that matters. If that is true what difference does it make if you go 9-7 or 7-9 every year? Then again, many here seem to be chronic complainers anyway.
    I forget, how many SBs did the Packers win between ’96 and ’08? Damn, 12yrs.
    A lot of “closet” MIN fans here, I fear.

  • Pack4life

    Buffalo is the smallest city in the AFC and at one time they were the best organization in football with Bill Polian and Marv Levy. The rise of the Patriots was their demise. Packers will never let the organization detiorate like that.

  • Reid

    Just when we were starting to actually talk about football, here goes this crap again. See you next week.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    C’mon, Reid, hang in there, we need you. Your last post on Kampy was right on. I want him to be the re-incarnation of Haley.

  • roy jamison

    I listen to some of those so-called experts like Charlie Brown used to listen to his teacher..waaah waaah, waaah waaah waaah. I am now hoping we get one more shot at number 4 in the playoffs. I think the third time will be the charm!

  • TRIP

    Al: “Mortensen made it sound like the two losses to the Vikings have rendered the Packers obsolete. Unless you are a Brett Favre suck-up and/or work for ESPN you are certainly more intelligent than to make a statement like that.”

    Al,

    You are on opposite sides of the table, but you are just as wrong as Mortensen. Was it not you that threatened to end the site off the strength of Favre beating us twice and even said, “Go Vikings”? Too many people, INCLUDING YOU, put ultimate value in those two games just because they were against Favre and not because they were NFC North, playoff-concerning games, etc. Favre did not ruin our season, and losing to them twice did not bring the end to our season, since other teams are faltering. What he did, in my opinion, was ruin the storyline that will be replayed for years and years like we still watch Montana and the Chiefs versus the Young and the 49ers.

    What you need to now accept is that Favre is a 3-time, possibly 4-time, MVP, super bowl winning QB, with a loads of probowls, countless non-Packer fans, and a future hall of famer. People are NOT going to stop talking about him. People are not going to stop volumizing small news and making it big news. And possibly, POSSIBLY, he doesn’t do anything special to create his lovers in the media, minus perhaps Steve Mariucci. I’ve watched ESPN with numerous ppl saying Favre would be a bust for the Vikes and others dare not speak against him. Whatever. You can only control what you say on Packernet. Make it about the Packers and not Favre. You lead me to believe Favre really is bigger than the rest of this team, when we can’t stop talking about him.

  • Mike from Arizona

    Mortensen does it to push up TV rating in this bad economy. Sound bite here, sound bite there. Total agree…. ESPN is the MSNBC of sports. Very little value.

    Favre/Cook team is a master at working the media. Favre had a master plan from the beginning on his retirement drama.

    IMO he did not like TT from the start and especially after they drafted AR in the first round. Favre wanted out for various reasons. He wanted to play for the Queens three years old. Favre major reasons for picking the Queens: They play in a dome, same offensive, Peterson & Excellent Defense. He can play at least a few more years because of playing in controlled environment (the Dome). It has always been about him (like it or not).

    The Packers can win all there games if they play like they did last week.

  • roy jamison

    Mike, nice post about ESPN being the MSNBC of sports. It’s a low blow but certainly well deserved. It would be nice if Fox sports would invest a couple of bucks to counter the decided viewpoints on ESPN. What amazes me is when you look at the pure stats and only one lowly opponent included in those stats, The Pack on defense and offense rank with anyone in the league. Now I’m not gonna hold my breathe waiting for ESPN to actually “search” for info.

  • Stevo

    Mort is just part of the ESPN sports star machine. The network wants to cover individuals, not teams (i.e. games become described as Favre v. Rodgers, Brady v. Manning, Manning v. Manning, Rivers v. Manning, etc.) To them it’s a more compelling story than offensive schemes not working, the merits of a 3-4 defense, or what halftime adjustments were made (or not made). Boring (feign yawn). Where’s my Favre-cam?

    It’s all dumbed down to the point that SportsCenter has become a version of Entertainment Tonight (does that make ESPN the new E! ?).

    Anyhoo. Superior overall personnel on the Vikings beat the Pack, not Favre (could you imagine Rodgers with that O line and running game? Heck, I think Bubby Brister could have a pretty good year on that team).

  • 25 Yrs Pack

    Now admin, lets settle, remeber your Devil quote, this is what I said was coming, the entire world of reporters against the Pack, so lets just deal with it, the more we talk about it, the more we loose. But the prob is, like I said before, most of the country views the situation through the same eyes Mort does, we are the minority with first hand experiene. No point in arguing with anyone outside of Wisconsin on this, no win situation.

  • http://packernet.com AJ

    Wow Al! Really got to agree with TRIP, he nailed it! What is it about Favre that made you so bitter? From most of what I’ve read in Packers blogs, the Packers are supposed to be a better team with ARodge at the helm. It does not matter where Farve is playing, OK. You are sounding like bitter jealous lover who got dumped and can’t let him go. As far as ESPN and Farve reporting its been that way for years and years and years. Love him or hate him he has always been talked about. Non Packer fans have had to put up with it for alot longer than you!

    You have a great site going here and I am now a daily visitor. Keep it going AL!

  • Dan

    Just my take, all media is just trying to draw in viewers/listeners. They’re all full of hot air. They’ll scream how their opinion is fact.

    Fox had Greta interview Favre and ran Favre’s bs side of this things without getting any takes from anyone in the Packers organization.

    Back to football…

    I believe in Lombardi’s philosophy. If the Packers execute, it doesn’t matter what anyone else does. Favre ain’t with the Packers, so what he does or doesn’t do is irrelevant. Packers win every game, they make the playoffs. Packers win every playoff game, they win the SB. It’s about the Packers execution, nothing more, nothing less.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Want some more controversy? TT’s so-called lack of FA activity has brought in Bigby (s), Lee (s), Williams (#3CB), Woodson (s), Pickett (s), Chillar (#5LB), Goode (LS), Havner (#3TE), Kapinos (P), and Bush/Kuhn in from waiver wire. Now you can argue till dooms day about the caliber as compared to others in the league, but most are starters and are specific role players. You can count on less than one hand those he has let go who are starting for someone else. And, don’t give me yesterday crap, talk the league today.

  • Jeremy (From Chicago)

    Mortenson is broadcasting from Favre’s back pocket.

    For Favre, as long as he is in the NFL especially the division he will always be a distraction to the Packers organization.

    He didn’t “ruin” the Packers season. The Vikings hurt the Packers chances but Favre didn’t ruin the season. I wish when Green was one of the top RBs in the NFL Favre would have played as disciplined as he is in Minnesota, but then again maybe Childress is just a better coach then Sherman was. Sherman coached from Favres back pocket.

    Favre hasn’t gotten it done in big games sin the 90′s For EACH big game the Packers won with him as QB over the last 7 years of his career he was the main reason for at LEAST 2 loses. As a Packer fan it pained me to watch him look like such shit till 2007 season when the Packers had a miracle year before he once again played like shit against the Giants. I just wanted him to go away.

    Favre is like that nagging, bitchy, nothing is good enough for me wife that leaves her husband loses weight starts to drink less and be a better person. As soon as she feels comfortable in her surrounding she reverts right back to her real personality and gets divorced again. Just wait. The Vikings season will end in an interception from Favre just as all of Favre’s last few playoff games have. Remeber 6 pick in St. Lou 2 against Atlanta what about the one at the end of the Philly game and don’t even get me started about the Giant game.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Childress with one year left on his contract about to get an extension – YIPEE!!!!

  • Oddball

    Larry – I don’t think you have a great argument there.

    The fact that players who couldn’t succeed here also can’t succeed elsewhere doesn’t speak well of their selection in the first place. The problem is that Thompson really needed 2-3 more successes near the caliber of Woodson to solidify our line and RB situation – or he needed to draft better at O-line and snag a running back from somewhere. (Could we have traded up for AP?)

    Two starting O-linemen instead of Junius Coston and Will Whitticker and we’d be pretty well set now instead of watching our exceptional quarterback getting his head caved in looking for the David Carr trophy. Add a stud RB like AP or Turner, and I think this year might have been a great deal more gentle on Rodgers.

    Catching my subtlety here? I’m not saying the man has destroyed the franchise; I am saying he seems to have been unwilling to pull the trigger when opportunities were there to bring in excellent players. Hell, I don’t know. Maybe he’s been working his ass off to do that sort of thing, and things just haven’t gone his way. Certainly it happens.

    I’m sticking with my standards. Get to 9-7 playoffs or not. Show some fire. Protect Rodgers. Run the ball against solid competition. After this year, if there is an upgrade available at HC, I’d be pleased to see it happen. You could make an argument that it’s more difficult to judge the performance of the GM, but it seems pretty clear that Mike McCarthy is not in the “outstandng” catagory.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Oddball, thats facts, and very easy to look back. But I can also point to drafting Jerry Tagge and not Franco Harris. On the face of that it looks terribly stupid. However, when you look past the headline and see the detail you find we had John Brockington and MacArthur Lane both in their mid-twenties and, ugh Scott Hunter at QB.
    Pretty easy to say we should have drafted two starting linemen instead of Coston and Whitticker but who knew they would not make it?
    Not so easy to say we should have drafted AP since he went 9 spots ahead of Harrell, but I could blame TT for not trading our 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th to move up and take him, couldn’t I. Would have looked stupid then, but not now. Thats the way it goes, win some, lose some.

  • Pack4life

    Last week should prove there are adequate groceries in the cupboard. I am not going to debate that any more should have could have. However the Master Chef is incompetent. We are expecting a five star meal and getting White Castle.
    This is a dangerous game. Hopefully the defense will score this game because they have to carry the team.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Can’t top that Pack4, other than to urge people to look behind the obvious and look at the reasoning. This results only attitude sets up the kind of situation I keep refering to in CHI and MIN. So far one worked, one didn’t, but who knows where they will be a couple of years from now. Here we are just plodding thru the mine field hoping we don’t step on one – rather, lets compare it to walking thru the pasture in the morning barefoot – when stepping into something warm might not be so bad. Like, one you get blown to hell, and the other maybe just a little messy.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    You know the more I think of it we have the same example in Packerland history.
    Lombardi bet the farm on the Anderson/Grabowski team and made his former DC look like a fool. Then came Devine and 20yrs of pain.
    Wolf left a pretty good team behind and Sherman, I think, had an overall winning record with it.
    Another similarity in those two senarios is that both stayed another year as GM after changing head coach. Lombardi in a sense firing himself as HC. Oh, well, its my Pack.

  • Jeff

    This goes back a while with Chrissy Mortensen,,
    Back in 2007 he pickeed against them almost every week .
    I have been saying for years that the networkd look down at the small market teams and pump up the big market teams. Count during a Bears game how many times they call them the CHICAGO BEARS. They do not say Bears or Chicago.
    For example, they annoncers when giving the score would say 49ers 7 and the Chicago Bears 6.
    ESPN has taken picks at the Packers for years , in the misdt of the 1996 supe bowl season they went out of their way to charge Green Bay with being a racist town.
    Quadry Ismail has something against the Pack too.
    Makes you wonder if these things sometimes are fixe because this year Favre said this is the best team he has played with but in 2007 even when the Packers were 9-1 Favre kept saying he was not sure if the team was any good.

  • Jeff

    Think about this,,whenever the Packers make a big play they say the other team made a mistake on defense. When the Packers make a big play on defense they say it was poor execution by the other team.
    However , when the Bears make a play on defense they say it was great defense by the Bears. When the Bears make a good play on offense once a year they say it was a great play by the Bears.
    I think there is so many signs that the big market teams get the favorable headlines from ESPN and all the networks

  • Andrew

    1) ESPN’s love for Favre is painful. I read this just to read another fellow soul who has suffered through their garbage. I just turn it off usually. Gruden, I listen to because it borders on a homosexual relationship with Favre and is just hilarious to listen to…

    “Watch him put it in there, O, O my, he puts it in there so hard and fast everytime.”If someone were to bother doing a media study, it would be painful to see how bias ESPN coverage is, let alone the rest of the media (but ESPN is special).

    2)That being said, ESPN definitely favors big markets, it is CORPORATE MEDIA! OF COURSE THEY DO! PROFITS!!!

    3) Sadly, LOL at all of your MSNBC comments. It makes me sad when politics mix with football because I’m reminded how many Packers fans who I’d enjoy BSing for hours about the Packers are brainwashed as hell. Stick to football. And let me guess, Fox is fair and balanced? Rush is god’s gift to humanity?

    How about all three of them are corporate run media and profit driven.

    MSNBC panders to the left of center, Fox panders to the right of center and pushes RNC talking points. Rush, well good god, nevermind.

  • Bob

    I believe the tampa loss you could blame on Favre and the Vikings, after such a big loss, I believe the Pack came out a little down and out, but who knows maybe that tampa game is what the pack needed, a team that they thought they could just go through the motions with and win, didn’t happen. so then they came back and played to their ability and showed why people should still take them seriously, I think they won’t take another bad team lightly, that is why I see them winning a lot more games and have a great chance to make a run at the playoffs! Go Pack!

  • Sammy

    Whaaaaaaaaa, whaaaaaaaa, teddy made my brett go bye, bye, whaaaaaaaaa!

    come on people, it is a business, favre owes us nothing. one losing season in 16 years, a superbowl, pro bowls, etc…..learn to let go, enjoy the past and move on.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Andrew, your questions deserve an answer since you posed them. I’ll answer no. 3 – yes, and yes!

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Teehee Larry. That’ll show the pinko commie liberals. Except of course those guys didn’t sell us out to Communist China. That was Bush senior and corporate profits. How does it feel knowing we gave the Chinese a trillion dollar mortgage on our future during Bush Jr.’s 8 years in office, or maybe you never heard that on Fox “News”. They must have been too busy worrying about corruption of our war effort in Iraq. No that can’t be right since they never mentioned that. Maybe their eyes were on Bin Laden while Bush was bringing him to justice. No, wait, that didn’t happen. Etc., etc., etc,.
    Tell you what, let’s just drop the political stuff. It’s really boring.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Alex Smith says “coach McCarthy taught me a lot about game management”. Good to know. Doesn’t Arod get criticized for lack of game management? I get so confused.

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Gee, Mark, you don’t sound boring to me; but, did I miss the football “stuff” in your post? Teehee!

  • jonnyfootballhero

    I just read that Buffalo picked up Brian Brohm from the practice squad. It really is too bad that he never turned into the player that many had picked to be NFL ready coming out of college. I actually met him at a Bergstrom Automotive meet and greet last november. Super nice guy, very intelligent. He sounded like he was more interested in coaching than he was in playing football (just my opinion). I got to meet Jordy Nelson the next day. Great guy as well. Again, too bad he didn’t turn out.

  • http://Orlando Mark

    Larry, the political crap I wrote really bored me. As for the football stuff I seem to have been posting the same things over and over since the draft. I like the new coaches, we’re too young therefore we’re going to have an up and down season, yada, yada. Rocky’s stupid invective gets me riled up but he seems to be missing. Maybe you and packer-bob can keep things lively until we get playoff fever. I’m out, GO PACK!

  • monty

    Hey Mr. AATP, I could do no worse then the current pair of fools. At least I know you need a strong running game and O-line to win in November and December and Mr. Randy Moss is way better than Aaron Rouse. For those of you who dont remember that year, I believe it was 2007, we had two third round draft choices. Ted offered a 5th round choice, the Patriot offered Oakland a 4th round choice. Ron Wolf always said if you want a player bad enough then get him, like Ted did for Clay Mathews. We can only imagine what our team would have been like with Favre and now Aaron Rodgers throwing to Randy Moss, but Ted could have offered our second 3rd round pick if he really wanted Randy Moss. According to Al Davis, Thompson didnt think Moss could run anymore (speed. So instead of using our second third round pick on Moss, we used it on Rouse, who never did much for us except the one touchdown against Indianapolis last year. Yeah I guess Ted was right about that one too, Randy can run, but he sure was able to help Tom Brady set the touchdown mark for a season at 50. Oh yeah, thank god Im not the GM, we might actually be able to compete instead of losing to teams that have rookie QB’s and no wins. I dont want to be the GM, but I can at least see what we dont have with the current one. If he is so great why are we only one game over 500 5 YEARS after he took the job. Why are we leading the league in sacks instead of touchdowns. IF everyone thinks the current roster and administration is so GREAT, then I guess Ill be seeing ya in Miami for the SB….NOT. Until Aaron Rodgers can take a snap and fully trust his line, we are not going to be winning any big games. If you read my first post, I want a administration and team like we had under Ron Wolf and Mike Holngrem. They knew how to build a team and win. Remember when Edgar Bennett use to run screens and Dorsey Levens etc. Watch the current group of linemen and backs. Even with Ahman Green who ran screens well under Sherman this group of linemen cant pull and run screens. They arent made to pull and run screens, all they can do is the ZBS which as we all see really has been a big success in GB. Oh yeah Ryan Grant is just running here and there..NOT. I am sure many of you have been Packer fans as long or longer than me, but I remember watching year after year of Packer teams that just couldnt get over that hump to win. From Bart Starr as our coach to Forrest Gregg, well thats how we look now..oh yeah we had a good game finally against Dallas…..but playoffs I dont see it with our current roster or administration. We went to the Championship game in 07 for one reason, Mr. Brett Favre period. He will be in the playoffs again, this Packer team will be home roasting weenies when the playoffs start.

  • jonnyfootballhero

    “Again, too bad he didn’t turn out.”

    I meant Brohm, not Nelson.

    -jfh

  • http://jlworden1suddenlink.net LarryTex

    Well, I don’t know how lively we make it Mark, but really just trying to exchange ideas. I may be the geezer here, but it seems like Monty is the one living in the past. No matter, since he probably spends more time on the MIN sites than he does here. I’d sure hate to be torn like that. Unhappy since ’07, terrible burden, can’t make up his mind whether to follow Moss or Favre.
    Thirty-four line post and the only positive thing to say about the Pack is “like Ted did for Clay Matthews” and “we had a good game finally against Dallas”. Good way to prove your support for the team.
    Oh, I know, the usual love the team, hate the coach and GM.