Comments on: Some ugly baby http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/ Packernet's Views on the latest Green Bay Packers news Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:27:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: roy jamison http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15611 roy jamison Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:21:33 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15611 Weather should be nice for Chicago tomorrow considering! Weather should be nice for Chicago tomorrow considering! ]]> By: packer_bob http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15610 packer_bob Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:08:40 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15610 20-0? I would love it if we could pitch a shut out in their house, but I find that doubtful. I'll go 24-10, Packers. 20-0? I would love it if we could pitch a shut out in their house, but I find that doubtful.

I’ll go 24-10, Packers.

]]> By: retiredgrampa http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15609 retiredgrampa Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:38:41 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15609 I would assume (hopefully) that Crosby can squibb kick bouncers to the 20 or so, to reduce the chances of Manning and cohorts. If we kick away, bad things will happen. I would assume (hopefully) that Crosby can squibb kick bouncers to the 20 or so, to reduce the chances of Manning and cohorts. If we kick away, bad things will happen. ]]> By: LarryTex http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15608 LarryTex Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:28:57 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15608 DA, I'm in the trap too. Pack 20-0. Concentration on PIT already since I don't think the Bearse have anything left on O or D, and all they have are runbacks. DA, I’m in the trap too. Pack 20-0. Concentration on PIT already since I don’t think the Bearse have anything left on O or D, and all they have are runbacks. ]]> By: Devil's Advocate... http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15607 Devil's Advocate... Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:02:16 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15607 Wonder why I bitch about the reffing???? Monday night was fucking horrendus officiating, pardon my french. I'm sure we can expect a bunch of rainbows heading T. William's way, for nothing other than to draw a penalty. Probably practiced it all week. But anyway, once those refs started calling the ticky-tacky stuff, then they had to call them all, then all the players wanted penalties all the time........ then the game got dragged down yadda, yadda, yadda. Couple things.......... the funny thing about the "arm bar" PI penalty is that it starts w/a offensive PI penalty when the WR sticks that arm back to shield the DB from the ball........ but they don't call that!!!! And then there's that facemask penalty which was the most pathetic of the night. After what seemed like 5 or 10 seconds by Jennings to finally get the call, I find it pathetic. I would have to assume at least one ref is supposed to watch the tackle. He would have had to seen the facemask and chose to ignore it, what does that say about him/them? Maybe worse yet is that he actually missed it and threw a flag for a penalty he didn't see and what does that really say about him/them???? The Packers have been flagged for simply brushing the facemask this year. Raji got tackled once in the open..... no flag. A hand hit A-Rod's helmet, the Pack got called for that this year also. I saw someone come in on A-Rod's legs..... no call. Brady gets those if anyone even touches his leg. Seems a little strange we have penalties that they only call for one player in the NFL. Then again it's not the first time. Not only do the N.E. Cheaters get a special leg touching penalty for their QB, they also get the special "tuck rule" treatment. NFL must be the "Not Fair" League. I'm picking the Pack to win again.............. by about 14. Wonder why I bitch about the reffing???? Monday night was fucking horrendus officiating, pardon my french. I’m sure we can expect a bunch of rainbows heading T. William’s way, for nothing other than to draw a penalty. Probably practiced it all week. But anyway, once those refs started calling the ticky-tacky stuff, then they had to call them all, then all the players wanted penalties all the time…….. then the game got dragged down yadda, yadda, yadda.
Couple things………. the funny thing about the “arm bar” PI penalty is that it starts w/a offensive PI penalty when the WR sticks that arm back to shield the DB from the ball…….. but they don’t call that!!!! And then there’s that facemask penalty which was the most pathetic of the night. After what seemed like 5 or 10 seconds by Jennings to finally get the call, I find it pathetic. I would have to assume at least one ref is supposed to watch the tackle. He would have had to seen the facemask and chose to ignore it, what does that say about him/them? Maybe worse yet is that he actually missed it and threw a flag for a penalty he didn’t see and what does that really say about him/them???? The Packers have been flagged for simply brushing the facemask this year. Raji got tackled once in the open….. no flag. A hand hit A-Rod’s helmet, the Pack got called for that this year also. I saw someone come in on A-Rod’s legs….. no call. Brady gets those if anyone even touches his leg. Seems a little strange we have penalties that they only call for one player in the NFL. Then again it’s not the first time. Not only do the N.E. Cheaters get a special leg touching penalty for their QB, they also get the special “tuck rule” treatment. NFL must be the “Not Fair” League. I’m picking the Pack to win again………….. by about 14. ]]> By: packer_bob http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15606 packer_bob Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:50:42 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15606 Sure seems like we're getting hot at the right time. I have been hard on MM and TT, but I've said all along 9-7 was my threshold for them to keep there jobs, and it sure looks like we're capable of doing far better than that at this point. For better or worse, MM is not going anywhere, and I never thought TT was in any jeapordy, except if we had finished a disastrous 4-12 or something like that. We're going to have to dance with what we've got at this point. Sure seems like we’re getting hot at the right time. I have been hard on MM and TT, but I’ve said all along 9-7 was my threshold for them to keep there jobs, and it sure looks like we’re capable of doing far better than that at this point.

For better or worse, MM is not going anywhere, and I never thought TT was in any jeapordy, except if we had finished a disastrous 4-12 or something like that. We’re going to have to dance with what we’ve got at this point.

]]> By: Sammy http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15605 Sammy Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:09:58 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15605 No game is ever a sure win!! Especially with this Packer team. I think we are getting hot at the right time but it was not too long ago that y'all were calling for TT/MM's head after the Bucs game. I am still calling for at least MM's head but let's see what happens......Go Pack! No game is ever a sure win!! Especially with this Packer team. I think we are getting hot at the right time but it was not too long ago that y’all were calling for TT/MM’s head after the Bucs game. I am still calling for at least MM’s head but let’s see what happens……Go Pack! ]]> By: Larry http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15604 Larry Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:43:57 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15604 Amen to that....I would greatly prefer a reduced yellow Xmas, especially on returns. And more than the Bears being dangerous the Packers can self destruct with turnovers and penalties. A couple weather induced defensive touchdowns by Chicago could be killers. Amen to that….I would greatly prefer a reduced yellow Xmas, especially on returns. And more than the Bears being dangerous the Packers can self destruct with turnovers and
penalties. A couple weather induced defensive touchdowns by Chicago could be killers. ]]> By: packer_bob http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15603 packer_bob Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:02:32 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15603 If Pittsburgh losing to Cleveland shows anything, it's not to take a game for granted. This is all Chicago has to play for tomorrow, to screw up the Packer's chance to make the playoffs. On paper I'd say we should kill them, and the local media is very dismissive of the Bears' chances. Naturally, I'd like us to win by 55. But I think it's very important we don't look past this game. I'd be nice to see us avoid the penalties and special teams gaffes just once as well. If Pittsburgh losing to Cleveland shows anything, it’s not to take a game for granted. This is all Chicago has to play for tomorrow, to screw up the Packer’s chance to make the playoffs.

On paper I’d say we should kill them, and the local media is very dismissive of the Bears’ chances. Naturally, I’d like us to win by 55.

But I think it’s very important we don’t look past this game. I’d be nice to see us avoid the penalties and special teams gaffes just once as well.

]]> By: packer_bob http://www.packernet.com/blog/2009/12/09/some-ugly-baby/comment-page-2/#comment-15602 packer_bob Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:05:35 +0000 http://www.packernet.com/blog/?p=271#comment-15602 Rocky, You're alive! (Old people---sometimes they need reassurance.) Rocky,

You’re alive!

(Old people—sometimes they need reassurance.)

]]>